Nematic Liquid Crystals
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 23, 2001 5415
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Symmetrically Substituted
of aryl-substituted liquid crystals with positive (13, 15, 17) and
with negative dielectric anisotropy (18) were synthesized by
similar methods as depicted in Scheme 3. The newly synthesized
materials were fully characterized by 1H and 19F NMR, and by
mass spectrometry. The purity was confirmed to be higher than
99.8% by GC and HPLC. The physical properties of the liquid
crystals in comparison with some of their nonfluorinated
analogues1,14 are summarized in Table 1. For better comparabil-
ity in the application oriented development of liquid crystal
mixtures, the “virtual” clearing points (TNI,extr), obtained by
extrapolation from the standard host mixture ZLI-4792, are also
listed in Table 1.15
Compared with their conventional ethylene-linked analogues,
the most striking difference of the new materials is the
dramatically increased real and “virtual”15 clearing temperatures,
and for the purely aliphatic systems their improved tendency
to form nematic mesophases (e.g. 1a f 2a). The increase of
the virtual clearing temperatures compared to that of the
ethylene-linked analogues ranges from 50 to 70 K. Remarkably,
in contrast to our earlier attempts to increase the clearing point
of highly fluorinated liquid crystals by axial fluorination of the
cyclohexane moiety,16 the fluorination of the central ethylene
link leads only to an insignificant increase of the rotational
viscosity (γ1). Less favorably, the fluorination also induces a
tendency to form smectic phases for the aryl-substituted liquid
crystals 13, 15, 17, and 18. With the single exception of the
pair 12 f 13 the birefringence (∆n) of the materials is slightly
decreased. The dielectric anisotropy (∆ꢀ) is essentially not
affected.
Especially the purely aliphatic, very low birefringent sub-
stance classes 2 and 11 are interesting for application in
reflective TFT displays, due to their favorable combination of
nematogenic mesophase behavior (with the exception of 2d),
high clearing points, and low rotational viscosity (γ1). Materials
such as 13, 15, 17, or 18 might be useful in dielectrically positive
(13, 15, 17) or negative (18) liquid crystal mixtures leading to
reduced threshold voltage and strongly improved clearing point,
without sacrificing switching time.
A comparative systematic conformational analysis on the
model systems 1,2-bis(trans-4-methylcyclohexyl)tetrafluoro-
ethane (19) and 1,2-bis(trans-4-methylcyclohexyl)ethane (20)
indicates that the unexpected extent of improvement of the
application relevant parameters can be attributed to the increased
rigidity of mesogenic core. Using the SPARTAN program17
and the MMFF94 force field,18 9 conformers of 19 and 14
conformers of 20 were found within 5 kcal‚mol-1. The
enthalpies were then recomputed by single point calculations
using density functional theory with the functional B3LYP19
Bis(cyclohexyl)tetrafluoroethane Derivativesa
a Conditions: (a) 1. Na suspension, Me3SiCl, toluene; 40 °C; 2.
NH4NO3, catalyst Cu(OAc)2, HOAc; reflux, 5 h (37%). (b) DAST neat,
catalyst ZnI2; 60 °C (13%). (c) SF4, catalyst HF, CH2Cl2; -196 f 70
°C, 2 d (16%).
Scheme 3. Model Synthesis of Unsymmetrically Substituted
Bis(cyclohexyl)tetrafluoroethane Derivativesa
a Conditions: (a) 1. MeOCH2PPh3 Cl-, KOtBu, THF; -10 °C f
+
room temperature; 2. 98% HCOOH, toluene; room temperature, 18 h;
3. catalyst NaOH, MeOH; room temperature, 1 h (53%). (b) 1. (4-
Propylcyclohexylmethyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide, LDA, THF;
-10 °C f room temperature (54% crude product); 2. MePhSO2Na,
HCl, toluene; reflux, 16 h (88%). (c) N-Methylmorpholine-N-oxide,
catalyst OsO4, H2O, dioxane; reflux, 18 h (65%). (d) 10 equiv of DMSO,
3 equiv of (CF3CO)2O, THF, CH2Cl2, NEt3; -60 f 5 °C, 18 h (75%).
(e) SF4, catalyst HF, CH2Cl2; -196 ° f 120 °C, 48 h (17%).
analogue 1. In addition, the higher lipophilicity induced by the
fluorination should reduce the ability of these materials to
solvate ionic impurities.5 The synthesis of the structurally simple,
symmetrically substituted derivatives of 1 started with an acyloin
condensation of the corresponding ethyl 4-alkylcyclohexyl-
carboxylates, followed by oxidation of the acyloin to the
R-diketone.10 Since it was not possible to fully convert the
R-diketone to the tetrafluoroethylene group by use of diethyl-
aminosulfurtrifluoride (DAST), the more reactive fluorination
reagent sulfurtetrafluoride had to be used. Since the acyloin
condensation only yields symmetric derivatives of 2, a more
generally applicable method was developed (Scheme 3): The
E-vinylene linked bicyclohexane derivatives were subjected to
a Sharpless dihydroxylation11 and subsequently oxidized under
Swern conditions,12 furnishing the R-diketone intermediate.
Unexpectedly, it was found that the dihydroxylation only
proceeds from the E-olefin while the Z-olefin is completely
unreactive under the same conditions. The fluorinated com-
(14) Goto, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Sawada, S.; Sugimori, S. Mol. Cryst. Liq.
Cryst. 1991, 209, 1-7.
(15) The phase transition temperatures are given in °C, the γ1 values in
mPa‚s. C ) crystalline, SX ) smectic X, N ) nematic, I ) isotropic.
Usually, the “virtual” parameters TNI,extr, ∆ꢀ, ∆n, and γ1 were determined
by linear extrapolation from a 10% w/w solution in the commercially
available Merck mixture ZLI-4792 (TNI ) 92.8 °C, ∆ꢀ ) 5.3, ∆n ) 0.0964).
The extrapolated values are corrected empirically for differences in the order
parameter. In some marked cases the following mixtures were used for
extrapolation: ZLI-2857 (TNI ) 82.3 °C, ∆ꢀ ) -1.4, ∆n ) 0.0776) and
ZLI-1132 (TNI ) 71.0 °C, ∆ꢀ ) 12.8, ∆n ) 0.1406). For the pure substances
the mesophases were identified by optical microscopy, and the phase
transition temperatures by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
(16) Kirsch, P.; Tarumi, K. Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 501-506; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 484-489.
13
pounds were obtained by reaction of the R-diketone with SF4
in reasonable yields.
For a comparative full evaluation of this novel class of
materials, aliphatic three-ring materials (11) and some examples
(10) Tietze, L.-F.; Eicher, T. Reaktionen und Synthesen im organisch-
chemischen Praktikum; Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, New York, 1981;
pp 233-235.
(11) (a) Akashi, K.; Palermo, R. E.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1978,
43, 2063. (b) VanRheenen, V.; Kelly, R. C.; Cha, D. Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
1976, 1973. (c) Ray, R.; Matteson, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 449.
(12) Huang, S. L.; Omura, K.; Swern, D. Synthesis 1978, 297.
(13) Burmakov, A. I.; Stepanov, I. V.; Kunshenko, B. V.; Sedova, L.
N.; Alekseeva, L. A.; Yagupolskii, L. M. J. Org. Chem. USSR 1982, 18,
1009-1013.
(17) SPARTAN, Version 5.1; Wavefunction Inc., 18401 Von Karman
Avenue, Suite 370, Irvine, CA 92612.
(18) Halgren, T. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490.
(19) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Lee, C.; Yang,
W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785.