1442 Organometallics, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1996
Zhao et al.
CH2); 10.1 (s, NH). 13C NMR (75.3 MHz, C6D5CD3, 298 K) δ
47.2 (s, CH2), no signal observed for CO ligands; (75.3 MHz,
C6D5CD3, 188 K) δ 43.9 (s, CH2) no signal observed for CO
ligands. IR (CH3CN) ν CO 1892 (s) cm-1; IR (C6H5Me) ν CO
of the H-Y bond and upon the basicity of X. Often
dissociation to yield X + H-Y will occur.
Solution IR studies by Poliakoff and Kazarian,3 and
by Epstein and co-workers,5 on hydrogen bonds from
alcohols to d8 Co, Rh, and Ir centers, and to d6 Fe, Ru,
and Os centers, respectively, indicate that O-H‚‚‚M
hydrogen bonds are strengthened by increasing the
basicity at the metal center. Protonation of the most
basic metal centers was observed, but there was no
evidence for (reverse) M-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bond forma-
tion. Indeed, observations of M-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonds
have been rare to date. Epstein and co-workers9 first
suggested, in 1993, that such an interaction is present
in the system (η5-C5Me5)2Os-H+‚‚‚OdPPh3, i.e. an Os-
H‚‚‚O hydrogen bond. Their conclusion was based upon
solution IR data which indicate diminished ν(Os-H)
and ν(PdO) stretching frequencies. This assertion is
supported in recent studies by Peris and Crabtree of a
number of cationic iridium hydrides that show the same
IR behavior indicative of LnIr-H+‚‚‚OdPPh3 hydrogen
bond formation.10 Pickett and co-workers11 have also
demonstrated the existence of M-H‚‚‚O hydrogen
bonds by obtaining crystallographic and NMR evidence
for a W-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bond in the compound [WH3-
(η1-OCOMe)(dppe)2] (dppe ) 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphi-
noethane)).
2020 (w), 1935 (w), 1898 (s) cm-1. Anal. Calcd. for C10H13
-
CoN2O4: C, 42.27; H, 4.61; N, 9.86. Found C, 39.85; H, 4.93;
N, 9.88. Better elemental analysis for this compound could
not be obtained.
-
(DABCO)H+Co(CO)3P P h 3 (2) was prepared by a modi-
fication of the procedure for 1. HCo(CO)4 prepared in situ was
first vacuum transferred to a toluene solution containing ca.
1 equiv of the phosphine ligand and stirred for 1 h prior to
introduction of the diamine. Typical byproducts in this
reaction include [HCo(CO)2(PPh3)2]12 and [Co2(CO)6(PPh3)2].
Compound 2 was originally isolated as a yellow crystalline
product by direct crystallization at -23 °C from an acetonitrile
solution of the crude mixture of products. Subsequently,
efforts to minimize byproducts included the use of less than 1
equiv of PPh3 (to prevent HCo(CO)2(PPh3)2 formation) and
reducing the amount DABCO present in the toluene solution
into which the initial HCo(CO)3PPh3 product is transferred.
Recrystallization from acetonitrile was then used to purify
material subsequently used in the NMR experiments. 1H
NMR (500 MHz, C6D5CD3, 298 K) δ 2.42 (s, CH2), δ 7.55 (t,
C6H5); (500 MHz, C6D5CD3, 183 K) δ 2.24, 1.66 (s, CH2), δ 8.06
(t, C6H5), 13.1 (s, NH). 13C NMR (125.5 MHz, C6D5CD3, 298
K) δ 46.9 (s, CH2), no signal observed for CO ligands; (125.5
MHz, C6D5CD3, 188 K) δ 43.4, 43.3 (s, CH2), no signal observed
for CO ligands. 31P NMR (202.5 MHz, C6D5CD3, 223 K) δ 63.7
ppm (s, PPh3) weak signal presumably due to quadrupole
broadening of 59Co; no signal observed at higher temperatures.
IR (CH3CN) ν CO 1928 (w), 1839 (s) cm-1; IR (C6H5Me) ν CO
1955 (w), 1857 (s) cm-1 (often additional bands at 2050 (w)
and 1972 (s), probably due to the presence of HCo(CO)3PPh3,
were also observed). Anal. Calcd for C28H28CoN2O3P: C,
62.55; H, 5.44; N, 5.40. Found C, 61.79; H, 5.66; N, 5.25.
X-r a y Cr ysta l Str u ctu r e Deter m in a tion s of 1 a n d 2.
Both crystal structures were solved by direct methods and
refined to convergence using the SHELXTL suite of pro-
grams.13 Data were corrected for absorption by semiempirical
methods.13 For 1 all non-hydrogen atoms were refined aniso-
tropically, ammonium hydrogens H(11) and H(21) were refined
isotropically, and all methylene hydrogens were refined using
a riding model with fixed isotropic displacement parameters.
For 2 the DABCO moiety exhibited orientational disorder
about the N‚‚‚N axis (staggered with respect to the carbonyl
groups, 67%; eclipsed with respect to the carbonyl groups,
33%). Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically,
except for carbon atoms of the minor orientation of DABCO.
Ammonium hydrogen H(1) was refined isotropically, and all
phenyl hydrogens were refined using a riding model with fixed
isotropic displacement parameters. The contributions of the
disordered methylene hydrogens were not included in the
model. Experimental data pertinent to both structure deter-
minations is given in Table 1.
We have previously described salts of the form
-
R3NH+Co(CO)4 that exhibit N-H‚‚‚Co hydrogen
bonds1b,c and sought to examine the similarities, and
differences, between such hydrogen bonds and (conven-
tional) hydrogen bonds which do not involve metal
atoms. In furthering these studies we have investigated
the effect of changing the basicity of the hydrogen bond
acceptor, Co, in salts of the type R3NH+Co(CO)3L- (L
) CO, PR3) by changing its ligand environment. Struc-
tural and spectroscopic studies of the salts (DABCO)-
H+Co(CO)3L- (DABCO ) 1,4-diazabicyclooctane; L )
CO, PPh3) were initiated. These studies are presented
together with ab initio calculations on the model com-
plexes Me3NH+Co(CO)3L- (L ) CO, PH3) and permit
the examination of the effect of increasing the basicity
at the metal center by replacing a CO ligand by a
phosphine ligand.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r es. All manipulations of oxygen- or
water-sensitive materials were carried out under an atmo-
sphere of argon either using Schlenk-line techniques or in a
Vacuum Atmospheres drybox. NMR spectra were recorded on
either a Varian XL-300 or Bruker ARX-500 spectrometer. IR
spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 1600 Series FT-IR
spectrometer. Elemental analyses were carried out by Schwarz-
kopf Microanalytical Laboratory, Woodside, NY.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
(DABCO)H+Co(CO)4- (1) was prepared by methods simi-
The structures of 1 and 2 have been determined by
low temperature X-ray diffraction and are depicted in
Figure 1. Selected interatomic distances and angles are
-
lar to those described for other R3NH+Co(CO)4 salts.1b,c,6
HCo(CO)4 was prepared in situ and added by vacuum transfer
directly to a toluene solution of DABCO to give 1 as a colorless
powder, which was recrystallized under argon from THF
solution at 20 °C to yield crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction.
Maximum yield obtained, 79%. 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D5CD3,
298 K) δ 2.18 (s, CH2); (300 MHz, C6D5CD3, 193 K) δ 1.74 (s,
listed in Table 2. 1 and 2 have structures similar to
- 1b,6
that reported for Et3NH+Co(CO)4
,
with an ap-
proximately linear N-H‚‚‚Co hydrogen bond (N-H‚‚‚
Co 173(3)° for 1; N-H‚‚‚Co 175(10)° for 2). The DABCO
methylene groups in 1 are staggered with respect to the
carbonyl groups. In compound 2 the phenyl groups of
(9) Epstein, L. M.; Shubina, E. S.; Krylov, A. N.; Kreindlin, A. Z.;
Rybinskaya, M. I. J . Organomet. Chem. 1993, 447, 277.
(10) Peris, E.; Crabtree, R. H. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995,
2179.
(11) Fairhurst, S. A.; Henderson, R. A.; Hughes, D. L.; Ibrahim, S.
K.; Pickett, C. J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1569.
(12) Zhao, D. Brammer, L. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 5897.
(13) Sheldrick, G. SHELXTL 4.2, Siemens Analytical X-ray Instru-
ments, Inc., Madison, WI, 1991.