1824 Organometallics, Vol. 15, No. 7, 1996
Ara et al.
deoxygenated water (50 mL). The aqueous solution was
filtered and added dropwise to a solution of NBu4Br (0.570 g,
1.532 mmol) in water (10 mL), causing the precipitation of 1
as a white solid, which was filtered off, washed repeatedly with
deoxygenated water, and, finally, air dried (0.443 g, 87% yield).
Anal. Calcd for C60H82F10N2Pt: N, 2.30; C, 59.25; H, 6.79.
Found: N, 2.06; C, 58.96; H, 6.68. IR (cm-1): ν(CtC) 2077
(vs); ν(C6F5)X-sensitive 765 (s). 19F NMR (CD3COCD3): δ -111.5
(d, Fo, 3J Pt-Fo ) 415 Hz); -170.5 (t, Fp, 3J F-F ) 20.5 Hz); -168.5
(m, Fm). 13C NMR (CD3COCD3): δ 150-135 (br, C6F5); 132.0
(Cipso, Ph); 130.4, 126.8, 121.5 (s, Ph); 120.1 (s, Câ, platinum
satellites not observed); 103.9 (s, CR, platinum satellites not
observed); 58.0 (s, N-CH2, nBu); 23.2 (s, -CH2-, nBu); 19.0
(s, -CH2-CH3, nBu); 12.6 (s, CH3, nBu). ΛM (in acetone) )
plane [least-squares plane defined by Pt(2), P(1), P(2),
and the midpoint of C(7)-C(8)].
Con clu d in g Rem a r k s
As noted in the Introduction, metallo or elementa
(main group) substituted alkynyl substrates insert
easily into the Pt-H bond of [trans-PtH(PEt3)2(solvento)]+
to give cis addition complexes as the kinetic products.
It has been suggested that the first step in these
reactions, as well as in the insertion of alkynes into a
Pt-H bond of related complexes,19 is the formation of a
complex in which the CtC triple bond of the alkyne (or
alkynyl fragment) is η2-coordinated to the metal center.
In this context, the synthesis of the trinuclear complexes
4-6 is unexpected and the structure of 4b provides a
strong indication that such species exist. The dianionic
nature of the starting precursors [trans-Pt(C6F5)2-
(CtCR)2]2-, and perhaps the presence of C6F5 groups,
seems to be influential on the behavior of 1-3 as simple
3-platinapenta-1,4-diyne ligands toward the very reac-
tive species [trans-PtHL2(acetone)]+. However, it should
be noted that the influence of the electronic factor is
not clear. We have recently found20 that the reaction
between cis-[Pt(C6F5)2(CO)(THF)] (THF ) tetrahydro-
furan) and trans-[PtH(CtCPh(PPh3)2] affords the bi-
nuclear µ-phenylethenylidene complex [(OC)(C6F5)2Pt-
(µ-CtC(Ph)H)Pt(PPh3)2] (8). The formation of this
complex 8 could be the result of an initial alkynylation
of the cis-[Pt(C6F5)2(CO)] fragment and simultaneous
formation of a binuclear zwitterionic species cis,trans-
[(OC)(C6F5)2Pt-(µ-CtCPh)Pt+H(PPh3)2], which probably
evolves via cis,cis isomerization and cis 1,2 addition to
yield the final µ-phenylethenylidene complex 8.
182 Ω-1 cm2 mol-1
.
Complexes 2 and 3 were obtained similarly but using a
larger excess of LiCtCR (LiCtCR/Pt ) 8/1), and in the case
of 3, THF was used as solvent.
2: LinBu (2.36 M, 2.40 mL, 5.67 mmol), SiMe3CtCH (0.56
g, 5.67 mmol), trans-[Pt(C6F5)2(tht)2] (0.5 g, 0.7 mmol); 0.400g,
78% yield. Anal. Calcd for C54H90F10N2PtSi2: N, 2.32; C,
53.67; H, 7.51. Found: N, 2.27; C, 53.61; H, 8.07. IR (cm-1):
ν(CtC) 2014 (s, sh); ν(C6F5)X-sensitive 759 (s). 1H NMR (CDCl3):
δ -0.16 (s, SiMe3); 0.89 [t, -CH3, nBu]; 1.29 [m, -CH2, nBu];
1.59 [m, -CH2-, nBu]; 3.35 [m, NCH2, nBu]. 19F NMR
(CDCl3): δ -112.1 (d, Fo, 3J Pt-Fo ) 339 Hz); -169.8 (t, Fp, 3J F-F
) 19.3 Hz); -169.2 (m, Fm). 13C NMR (CD3COCD3, -50 °C):
δ 102.1 (s, CR or Câ); 57.3 (s, N-CH2, nBu); 22.7 (s, -CH2-,
nBu); 18.7 (s, -CH2-CH3, nBu); 12.5 (s, CH3, nBu); 0.81 (s,
SiMe3). ΛM (in acetone) ) 142 Ω-1 cm2 mol-1
.
3: LinBu (2.36 M, 1.83 mL, 4.31 mmol), BuCtCH (0.35 g,
4.31 mmol), trans-[Pt(C6F5)2(tht)2] (0.38 g, 0.54 mmol); 0.335
g, 90% yield. Anal. Calcd for C56H90F10N2Pt: N, 2.38; C, 57.18;
H, 7.71. Found: N, 2.20; C, 56.91; H, 8.01. IR (cm-1): ν(CtC)
2091 (vs); ν(C6F5)X-sensitive 756 (s). 1H NMR (CD3COCD3): δ 0.97
t
t
(s, Bu); 0.89 [t, -CH3, nBu]; 1.35 [m, -CH2, nBu]; 1.78 [m,
-CH2-, nBu]; 3.54 [m, NCH2, nBu]. 19F NMR (CD3COCD3):
3
3
δ -110.0 (d, Fo, J Pt-Fo ) 398 Hz); -171.8 (t, Fp, J F-F ) 19.5
Hz); -169.8 (m, Fm). 13C NMR (CD3COCD3): δ 107.5 (s, CR or
Exp er im en ta l Section
n
t
n
Câ); 59.2 (s, N-CH2, Bu); 33.4 (s, Bu); 24.3 (s, -CH2-, Bu);
19.8 (s, -CH2-Me, nBu); 13.4 (s, CH3, nBu). ΛM (in acetone)
All manipulations were performed under N2 atmosphere
using standard Schlenk techniques. All solvents were distilled
from appropriate drying agents. Elemental analyses of C, H,
and N and IR spectra were obtained as described elsewhere.7
1H, 19F, 13C, and 31P NMR spectra were recorded on either a
Varian XL-200 or a Bruker ARX 300 instrument. Chemical
shifts are reported in ppm relative to external standards
(SiMe4, CFCl3, and 85% H3PO4). Conductivities were mea-
sured in ca. 5 × 10-4 M acetone solutions using a Phillips 9501/
01 conductimeter, and mass spectra were obtained in a VG
Autospec spectrometer. Starting materials trans-[Pt(C6F5)2-
(tht)2]21 and trans-[PtHClL2] (L ) PPh3,13b PEt313c) were
prepared according to literature procedures. AgClO4 was
prepared by following a method previously described22 but
using Ag2CO3 as precursor.
P r ep a r a tion of (NBu 4)2[tr a n s-P t(C6F 5)2(CtCR)2] (R )
P h (1), SiMe3 (2), tBu (3)). A typical preparation for complex
1 was as follows: A solution of LinBu in hexane (2.36 M, 1.47
mL, 3.47 mmol) was added dropwise during 5 min to a diethyl
ether solution (30 mL) of PhCtCH (0.36 g, 3.48 mmol) at -10
°C. After 20 min of stirring, trans-[Pt(C6F5)2(tht)2] (0.491 g,
0.696 mmol) was added and the mixture stirred for 24 h at
room temperature. The resulting white suspension was
evaporated to dryness, and the residue was treated with
) 169 Ω-1 cm2 mol-1
.
P r ep a r a tion of tr a n s,tr a n s,tr a n s-{[P t(C6F 5)2(µ-η1:η2-
CtCP h )2](P tHL2)2} (L ) P P h 3 (4a ), P Et3 (4b)). To a
filtered solution of 0.198 mmol of [trans-PtH(PPh3)2(acetone)]-
(ClO4) (prepared from 0.15 g (0.198 mmol) of trans-[PtHCl-
(PPh3)2] and AgClO4 (0.041 g, 0.198 mmol) in 30 mL of acetone)
was added 0.115 g (0.095 mmol) (0.95 molar equiv) of 1, giving
a deep yellow solution. After 10 min of stirring at room
temperature, a yellow solid precipitated. The mixture was
stirred for 30 min and then concentrated to ca. 10 mL. The
solid was filtered off, washed with acetone (1 mL), and air dried
(0.119 g, 58% yield). Anal. Calcd for C100H72F10P4Pt3: C,
55.28; H, 3.34. Found: C, 54.96; H, 3.69. IR (cm-1): ν(Pt-
H) 2145 (s); ν(CtC) 1932 (vs); ν(C6F5)X-sensitive, this absorption
can not be assigned unambiguously. FAB mass spectrum:
1
molecular peak not observed, m/z 719, [Pt(PPh3)2]+, 100%. H
NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.27 (m, 60 H, PPh3); 6.70 (t, 2 Hp, Ph), 6.44
1
(t, 4 Hm, Ph); 5.70 (d, 4 Ho, Ph); -9.08 (t, 2 H, Pt-H, J Pt-H
)
1088 Hz, J P-H ) 13.4 Hz). 19F NMR (CDCl3): δ -109.2 (d,
2
Fo, J Pt-Fo ) 351 Hz); -165.7 (m, Fp and Fm). 31P NMR
3
1
(CDCl3): δ 24.11 (s, J Pt-P ) 2986 Hz).
Using a similar procedure, the reaction between trans-
[PtHCl(PEt3)2] (0.120 g, 0.256 mmol), AgClO4 (0.053 g, 0.256
mmol), and (NBu4)2[trans-Pt(C6F5)2(CtCPh)2] (0.148 g, 0.122
mmol) gave 4b as a yellow solid (0.101 g, 52% yield). Anal.
Calcd for C52H72F10P4Pt3: C, 39.13; H, 4.55. Found: C, 39.46;
H, 4.60. IR (cm-1): ν(Pt-H) 2151 (s); ν(CtC) 1989 (m), 1949
(vs). FAB mass spectrum: molecular peak not observed, m/z
431, [Pt(PEt3)2]+, 100%. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.29, 7.10 (m,
10 H, Ph); 1.64 (m, 24 H, CH2, PEt3), 0.95 (m, 36 H, CH3, PEt3);
(19) (a) Attig, T. G.; Clark, H. C.; Wong, C. S. Can. J . Chem. 1977,
55, 189. (b) Clark, H. C.; J ablonski, C. R.; Wong, C. S. Inorg. Chem.
1975, 14, 1332. (c) Clark, H. C.; Wong, C. S. J . Organomet. Chem. 1975,
92, C31.
(20) Ara, I.; Berenguer, J . R.; Fornie´s, J .; Lalinde, E.; Toma´s, M.
Organometallics, in press.
(21) Uso´n, R.; Fornie´s, J .; Mart´ınez, F.; Toma´s, M. J . Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1980, 888.
(22) Smith, G. F.; Ring, F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 1889.
1
2
-9.6 (t, 2 H, Pt-H, J Pt-H ) 1255 Hz, J P-H ) 13.5 Hz). 19F