520
S. Chatterjee et al./Bioorg. Med. Chem. 6 (1998) 509±522
with brine (1Â30 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated
to give a crude product that was puri®ed by ¯ash silica
gel column chromatography (eluant: 2% ethyl acetate in
hexanes) to give 4.60 g (32%) of 24 as a colorless oil; Rf
(5% ethyl acetate in hexanes): 0.37; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d
7.80 (t, 4H), 7.50 (m, 3H), 4.15 (q, 2H), 3.00 (m, 2H),
2.65 (m, 1H), 2.00 (m, 1H), 1.80 (m, 1H), 1.60 (m, 3H),
1.25 (t, 3H), 0.90 (t, 6H).
tion generated 0.070 g (100%) of compound 28, that
was used without any further puri®cation. In a similar
way, 0.065 g of 27 was converted to 0.070 g (100%) of
29. Compound 28: White solid, mp 112±114 ꢀC; Rf
1
(60% ethyl acetate in hexanes): 0.35; H NMR (CDCl3)
d 8.50 (s, 1H), 8.00 (m, 3H), 7.85 (d, 1H), 7.65 (m, 2H),
6.05 (d, 1H), 4.15 (m, 1H), 3.80 (dd, 1H), 3.50 (m, 1H),
3.40 (m, 1H), 3.20 (m, 1H), 2.80 (m, 2H), 2.00 (m, 2H),
1.60-1.40 (m, 5H), 1.20 (m, 1H), 0.90 (m, 12H). Com-
pound 29: White solid, mp 112±115 ꢀC; Rf (60% ethyl
2-Isobutyl-4-(2-thionaphthyl)butyric acid (25). A mixture
of compound 24 (4.53 g, 0.014 mol), lithium hydroxide
monohydrate (2.30 g, 0.055 mol), ethanol (60 mL) and
water (15 mL) was gently re¯uxed for 3 h. Ethanol was
removed in vacuo and the basic aqueous layer was
washed with ether (2Â20 mL), acidi®ed with 5 N HCl
and extracted into ethyl acetate (3Â50 mL). The com-
bined organic layer was washed with brine (1Â20 mL),
dried (MgSO4), and concentrated to give 3.80 g (92%)
of 25 as a white solid, mp 76±78 ꢀC; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d
7.80 (t, 4H), 7.40 (m, 3H), 3.00 (m, 2H), 2.70 (m, 1H),
2.00 (m, 1H), 1.80 (m, 1H), 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.25 (m, 1H),
0.90 (t, 6H).
1
acetate in hexanes): 0.32; H NMR (CDCl3) d 8.50 (s,
1H), 8.00 (m, 3H), 7.85 (d, 1H), 7.70 (m, 2H), 6.00 (d,
1H), 4.05 (m, 1H), 3.65 (m, 1H), 3.55 (m, 1H), 3.20 (m,
2H), 2.65 (m, 2H), 2.00 (q, 2H), 1.60 (m, 3H), 1.40 (m,
2H), 1.20 (m, 1H), 0.90 (m, 12H).
(S)/(R)-2-Isobutyl-4-(2-sulfonylnaphthyl)butyric acid ((S)-
1-formyl-3-methyl)butyl amides (30,31). These com-
pounds were synthesized following the synthetic proce-
dure as described above for the syntheses of the
compounds 7a±d. Thus, the oxidation of 28 (0.063 g,
0.145 mmol) gave 0.040 g (60%) of compound 30. In a
similar way, 0.063 g of 29 was converted to 0.034 g
(54%) of 31. Compound 30: White solid, mp 104±109 ꢀC
(softening to melt); Rf (70% ethyl acetate in hexanes):
0.87; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 9.60 (s, 1H), 8.55 (s, 1H), 8.00
(m, 4H), 7.70 (m, 2H), 6.40 (d, 1H), 4.65 (m, 1H), 3.65
(m, 1H), 3.20 (m, 1H), 2.80 (m, 1H), 2.10 (m, 1H), 1.90
(m, 1H), 1.60±1.40 (m, 4H), 1.20 (m, 1H), 0.90 (m, 12H).
MS m/e 432 (M+H). Anal. (C24H33NO4S) C, H, N.
Compound 31: White foam, Rf (70% ethyl acetate in
hexanes): 0.83; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 9.60 (s, 1H), 8.45 (s,
1H), 8.00 (m, 3H), 7.85 (d, 1H), 7.70 (m, 2H), 6.20 (d, 1H),
4.50 (m, 1H), 3.20 (m, 2H), 2.70 (m, 1H), 2.00 (q, 2H),
1.80±1.40 (m, 5H), 1.20 (m, 1H), 0.90 (m, 12H). MS
m/e 432 (M+H). Anal. (C24H33NO4S.0.5 H2O) C, H,
N.
(S)/(R)-2-Isobutyl-4-(2-thionaphthyl)butyric acid ((S)-1-
hydroxymethyl-3-methyl)butyl amide (26,27). These
compounds were generated following the synthetic pro-
cedure as described above for the syntheses of the com-
pounds 6a±d. Thus, the coupling between 25 (3.35 g,
0.011 mol) and (S)-leucinol (1.70 g, 0.0143 mol), in the
presence of BOP/HOBt/NMM, gave a mixture of com-
pounds that were separated by column chromato-
graphy (silica gel, 30% ethyl acetate in hexanes) to
produce 0.95 g (21%) of 26 and 1.10 g (25%) of 27,
respectively. Compound 26: White solid, mp 96±98 ꢀC;
Rf (50% ethyl acetate in hexanes): 0.51; 1H NMR
(CDCl3) d 7.80 (t, 4H), 7.45 (m, 3H), 5.65 (d, 1H), 4.05
(m, 1H), 3.60 (m, 1H), 3.40 (m, 1H), 3.15 (m, 1H), 3.00
(m, 1H), 2.80 (b, 1H), 2.50 (m, 1H), 2.00 (m, 1H), 1.80±
1.10 (m, 7H), 0.90 (m, 12H). Compound 27: White
solid, mp 85±90 ꢀC; Rf (50% ethyl acetate in hexanes):
(R)-2-Isobutyl-4-(2-thionaphthyl)butyric acid ((S)-1-formyl-
3-methyl)butyl amide (32). This compound was pre-
pared from compound 27, following the same procedure
as described above for the synthesis of 7a±d. Thus,
0.23 g of 27 was oxidized to generate 0.12 g (53%) of 32
as a white solid, mp 75±76 ꢀC; Rf (70% ethyl acetate in
1
0.40; H NMR (CDCl3) d 7.80 (m, 4H), 7.45 (m, 3H),
5.70 (d, 1H), 4.05 (m, 1H), 3.65 (m, 1H), 3.55 (m, 1H),
3.15 (m, 1H), 2.90 (m, 2H), 2.50 (m, 1H), 2.00 (m, 1H),
1.80-1.40 (m, 4H), 1.40±1.10 (m, 3H), 0.90 (t, 6H), 0.80
(t, 6H).
1
hexanes): 0.85; H NMR (CDCl3) d 9.60 (s, 1H), 7.80
(m, 4H), 7.45 (m, 3H), 5.90 (d, 1H), 4.60 (m, 1H), 3.20
(m, 1H), 2.90 (m, 1H), 2.60 (m, 1H), 2.00 (m, 1H), 1.80±
1.40 (m, 5H), 1.40 (m, 1H), 1.20 (m, 1H), 0.90 (m, 12H).
MS m/e 400 (M+H), 422 (M+Na). Anal. (C24H33
NO2S) C, H, N.
(S)/(R)-2-Isobutyl-4-(2-sulfonylnaphthyl)butyric acid ((S)-
1-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl)butyl amide (28,29). To a
solution of compound 26 (0.065 g, 0.1618 mmol) in
methylene chloride (3 mL) at 0 ꢀC was added m-chlor-
operbenzoic acid (95%, 0.062 g, 0.356 mmol) in methyl-
ene chloride (2 mL). The cooling bath was removed, the
mixture was stirred for another 30 min and washed suc-
cessively with 5% sodium thiosul®te solution (2Â5 mL),
water (1Â5 mL), 3% NaHCO3 solution (2Â5 mL), and
brine (1Â5 mL). Drying (Na2SO4) and solvent evapora-
(R)-2-Isobutyl-4-(2-sulfoxylnaphthyl)butyric acid ((S)-1-
hydroxymethyl-3-methyl)butyl amide (33). To a stirred
solution of 27 (0.23 g, 0.573 mmol) in methylene chloride
(4 mL) at room temperature was added a solution of
Davis' oxaziridine (0.17 g, 0.58 mmol). The mixture was