Cyclometalated Complexes of Pt and Pd
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 18, 1996 5185
Figure 4. Pattern of DNA bands of linear pF18 plasmid DNA
incubated with compound 5 and cis-DDP at ri ) 0.10 for different
periods of time. (lanes 1 and 2) control; (lanes 3-6) cis-DDP; (lanes
7-12) compound 5. Legend: ds ) double strand, ss ) single strand;
Cn ) native DNA, Cd ) denatured DNA.
Figure 3. Changes in the electrophoretic mobility of the ccc (covalently
closed circular) and oc (open circular) forms of native pUC8 plasmid
DNA after incubation with compound 5: (lane 1) control; (lanes 2-5)
compound 5; (lanes 6 and 7) cis-DDP.
incubation with the drug, most of the DNA migrates as the
double-stranded form (lane 6) as an indication of interstrand
cross-link formation. A quantitative analysis of the autorra-
diographs indicated that after 3 and 6 h of incubation of the
DNA with cis-DDP about 20% and 100% of the DNA remained
in the double-stranded form. In contrast, compound 5 did not
induce interstrand cross-linking, since all the DNA remained
in the single-stranded form.
Conclusion. In view of these results we think that the
biochemical activity of compound 5 must be attributed to
covalent binding to DNA, forming mono- or bifunctional Pt-
DNA adducts, which in turn induces important modifications
of the helix. We suggest that compound 5 induces intrastrand
adducts in way similar to that for cis-DDP.
than that induced by cis-DDP.21 In fact, while the Tm value of
native DNA is 62 °C, the Tm value of compound 5-DNA
formed at ri ) 0.01 decreases to 56.5 °C (∆Tm ) -5.5 °C).
The Tm value increases to 58 °C (∆Tm ) -4 °C) at ri ) 0.10.
It is interesting to note that when ri increases from 0.01 to 0.10
in complex 5-DNA, a Tm increment of 1.5 °C is observed, in
contrast with what was detected for cis-DDP. The decrease in
Tm of the DNA due to compound 5 binding probably results
from intrastrand adduct formation in a similar way as for cis-
DDP, since it has been shown that these kinds of adducts are
responsible for DNA destabilization.22
Electrophoretic Behavior of Drug-DNA Complexes. The
analysis of the influence of compound 5 on the tertiary structure
of DNA was determined by its ability to alter the electrophoretic
mobility of the covalently closed circular (ccc) and open circular
(oc) forms of pUC8 plasmid DNA. Figure 3 shows the mobility
of native pUC8 plasmid DNA and of plasmid DNA incubated
with compound 5 at ri ) 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.25, and with
cis-DDP at ri ) 0.10 and 0.25. It was observed that as the ri
value increases, incubation of the DNA with compound 5
gradually induces a decrease in mobility of the ccc form and
an increase in mobility of the oc forms of pUC8 DNA. It is
likely that the decrease in mobility of the supercoiled DNA must
be attributed to unwinding of the superhelix. The increase in
mobility of the oc form might possibly be associated with a
DNA-shortening effect.23,24 The changes in mobility due to cis-
DDP binding are slightly higher than those due to compound
5. The lower level of DNA uncoiling relative to cis-DDP shown
by compound 5 may be explained either by less bending of the
double helix (less than 42°) due to intrastrand bifunctional
adducts or by a lower level of DNA binding and intrastrand
monofunctional DNA adducts imposed by the bulky cyclo-
metalated residues in compound 5.
III. Experimental Section
General Procedures. The infrared spectra were recordered in Nujol
mulls and KBr pellets in the 4000-200 cm-1 range using a Perkin-
Elmer Model 283 spectrophotometer. NMR spectra were recordered
on a Bruker WP-200-SY (200 MHz) spectrometer in CDCl3 with TMS
as internal standard and in DMSO-d6. The C, H, and N analyses were
carried out in a Perkin-Elmer 240B microanalyzer. All solvents were
purified, prior to use, by standard methods.25 Pd(OAc)2 and K2PtCl4
were purchased from Strem and Johnson Matthey, respectively. Ligand
1 (L; N-(4-chlorophenyl)-R-benzoylbenzylideneamine) was synthesized
as previously described.26
Synthesis of [PdL(µ-OAc)]2 (2). A mixture of equimolar amounts
of Pd(OAc)2 and L in HOAc was heated at 50 °C under nitrogen for
2 h. After removal of the solvent in vacuo the residue was extracted
with CH2Cl2. The elution with CH2Cl2-EtOH (1%) gave the desired
complex 2 (yield 56%). Anal. Calcd for C44H32N2O6Cl2Pd2: C, 54.56;
H, 3.31; N, 2.89. Found: C, 54.51; H, 3.32; N, 2.92. IR (νmax, cm-1):
CdO, 1672; CdN, 1598; CsOacet 1584, 1418; PdsN, 450; PdsC,
610. 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 7.72-6.80 (m, 9H, aromatic
protons), 6.93 and 6.65 (AA′BB′, 4H), 1.80 (s, 3H, OAc).
Synthesis of [PdL(µ-Cl)]2 (3). Method A. To a solution of the
acetate-bridged dimer (compound 2) in acetone was added an equimolar
amount of NaCl. The solid obtained (compound 3) was filtered and
dried in vacuo (yield 78%).
Method B. A mixture of equimolar amounts of PdCl2 and of L in
MeOH was stirred for 2 days at 25 °C. The solid obtained (compound
3) was filtered and dried in vacuo (yield 40%). Anal. Calcd for C40-
H26N2O2Cl4Pd2: C, 52.14; H, 2.82; N, 3.04. Found: C, 52.09; H, 2.79;
N, 3.03. IR (νmax, cm-1): CdO, 1673; CdN, 1594; PdsN, 451; PdsC,
606; PdsCl, 319, 295.
Interstrand Cross-Link Formation. Since gel electrophore-
sis experiments suggested that compound 5 induces DNA
intrastrand drug-DNA adducts in a way similar to that of cis-
DDP, we further tested whether compound 5 is also able to
induce interstrand cross-links. Figure 4 shows the pattern of
DNA bands of linear pF18 plasmid DNA incubated with
compounds 5 and cis-DDP at ri ) 0.10 for different periods of
time. Figure 4 shows that native linear pF18 melted DNA
migrates as a band which corresponds to the single-stranded
DNA form (lane 2). As expected, upon cis-DDP binding there
is a gradual increase in the double stranded form. After 6 h of
Synthesis of [PtL(µ-Cl)]2 (4). To a solution of bis(µ-chloro)bis-
[(η3-2-methylallyl)platinum] in CHCl3 was added 2 equiv of L. This
mixture was refluxed until a precipitate was formed. The precipitate
was filtered, washed with CHCl3 and ether, and dried in vacuo (yield
62%). Anal. Calcd for C40H26N2O2Cl4Pt2: C, 43.72; H, 2.37; N, 2.55.
(21) Eastman, A. Biochemistry 1983, 22, 3927.
(22) Johnson, N. P.; Lapetoule, P.; Razaka, H.; Villani, G. In Biochemical
Mechanisms of Platinum Antitumor Drugs; McBrien, D. H. C., Slater,
T. F., Eds.; IRL Press: Oxford, U.K., 1986; pp 1-28.
(23) Cohen, G. L.; Lippard, S. J. Science 1979, 203, 1014.
(24) Hermans, T. S.; Teicher, B. A.; Chan, V.; Collins, L. S. Cancer Res.
1988, 48, 2335.
(25) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F.; Perrin, D. R. Purification of
Laboratory Chemicals, 2nd ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1980.
(26) Alcaide, B.; Leo´n-Santiago, M. A.; Pe´rez-Ossorio, R.; Plumet, J.;
Sierra, M. A.; De la Torre, M. Synthesis 1982, 989.