T. Ono et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 506 (2010) 297–301
301
0.93 (for Na) and 0.82 (for K), Tdes decreases from 136 ◦C to 92 and
58 ◦C, respectively. 27Al isotropic chemical shift similarly decreases
from 123 ppm to 121 and 116 ppm. This tendency is also observed
for the alkali-earth system, M = Mg and Ca. It is interesting to note
that the Tdes–ꢃp relationship for M[Al(NH2)4]x shows an opposite
tendency to that for metal borohydries M[BH4]n (M = Mg, Ca–Mn,
Zn, Al, Y, Zr and Hf; n = 2–4), where Tdes decreases as a function of
ꢃp of M [22]. We here try to rationalize the relationship between
Tdes and magnetic shielding on the Al site. When the atomic num-
ber of the cation is increased (i.e., ꢃp decreases), the difference of
ꢃp between the cation and nitrogen in [Al(NH2)4]− becomes larger.
Increasing the electron from the cation to nitrogen will reduce the
electron donated from Al to nitrogen. That causes Al having higher
charge density, which increases magnetic shielding effect on the
Al nucleus and gives a negative frequency shift (Table 1). Reducing
the electron donation from Al to nitrogen suggests weakening the
Al–N bonds to lower the NH3 desorption temperature. This indi-
cates that the thermal stability of M[Al(NH2)4]x can be driven by
the choice of the cation M. In addition, the Tdes–ꢃp relationship for
M[Al(NH2)4]x shows different tendencies in the groups of IA and
IIA, which should be quite different from the tendency reported on
M[BH4]n by Nakamori et al. [22].
tion temperature, which may suggest that the weakening of Al–N
bonds involves the NH3 gas release. This means that the NH3 des-
orption temperature can be controlled by replacing the cation, and
thus could provide a new insight for hydrogen storage application
when the MH–Mꢀ[Al(NH2)4]x composite materials are prepared.
Acknowledgement
This work was partially supported by the NEDO project
“Advanced Fundamental Research Project on Hydrogen Storage
Materials”. The SR-XRD experiments were performed at the SPring-
8 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research
Institute (JASRI) (Proposal No. 2008B2101).
References
[1] L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, Nature 414 (2001) 353–358.
[2] P. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Luo, J. Lin, K.L. Tan, Nature 420 (2002) 302–304.
[3] S.J. Pawel, J. Nucl. Mater. 218 (1995) 302–313.
[4] T. Ichikawa, N. Hanada, S. Isobe, H. Leng, H. Fujii, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004)
7887–7892.
[5] R. Janot, J. Eymery, J. Tarascon, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 2335–2340.
[6] J. Rouxel, R. Brec, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris C 262 (1966) 1071–1073.
[7] H. Jacobs, K. Ja¨nichen, C. Handenfeidt, R. Juza, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 531 (1985)
125–139.
[8] N. Aliouane, T. Ono, O.M. Lovvik, M. Tsubota, T. Ichikawa, Y. Kojima, B.C.
Hauback, submitted for publication.
4. Conclusions
[9] R. Brec, J. Rouxel, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris C 264 (1967) 512–515.
[10] H. Jacobs, B. Nöcker, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 619 (1993) 381–386.
[11] L. Frydman, J.S. Harwood, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 5367–5368.
[12] J.-P. Amoureux, C. Fernandez, S. Steuernagel, J. Magn. Reson. A 123 (1996)
116–118.
Metal aluminum amides M[Al(NH2)4]x (M = Li, Na, K, Mg, and Ca;
x = 1 and 2) were successfully prepared by mechanical milling under
liquid NH3 condition. Structural characterization was performed
by SR-XRD, FT-IR, and solid state NMR techniques. The crystal
structures of LiAl(NH2)4 and NaAl(NH2)4 were identical to those
previously reported. On the other hand, KAl(NH2)4, Mg[Al(NH2)4]2,
and Ca[Al(NH2)4]2 were found to be novel metal aluminum amides.
They all have an anion complex [Al(NH2)4]−, where [NH2]− is cova-
lently bonded with Al, and cations M+ or M2+ are charge balancing.
TG-DTA-MS profiles showed that M[Al(NH2)4]x started to release
the NH3 gas at around 100 ◦C, much lower temperatures than that
shown by M(NH2)x. We found that the NH3 desorption temperature
decreased with the increasing atomic number of respective alkali
and alkaline-earth cations in M[Al(NH2)4]x. We further observed
that 27Al isotropic chemical shift was correlated with the desorp-
[13] H.D. Lutz, N. Lange, H. Jacobs, B. Nöcker, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 613 (1992)
83–87.
[14] P.P. Molinie, R. Brec, J. Rouxel, P. Herpin, Acta Cryst. B29 (1973) 925–932.
[15] R. Brec, P. Palvadeau, P. Herpin, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris C 274 (1972) 266–268.
[16] R. Brec, J. Rouxel, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 7 (1968) 2721–2726.
[17] P. Palvadeau, M. Drew, G. Charlesworth, J. Rouxel, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris C 275
(1972) 881–884.
[18] A.W. Titherley, J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 65 (1894) 504–522.
[19] H.Y. Leng, T. Ichikawa, S. Hino, N. Hanada, S. Isobe, H. Fujii, J. Phys. Chem. B 108
(2004) 8763–8765.
[20] S. Hino, T. Ichikawa, H. Leng, H. Fujii, J. Alloys Compd. 398 (2005) 62–66.
[21] D.R. Lide (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 89th ed., CRC Press,
2008.
[22] Y. Nakamori, H.-W. Li, M. Matsuo, K. Miwa, S. Towata, S. Orimo, J. Phys. Chem.
Solids 69 (2008) 2292–2296.