164
KUBOWICZ ET AL.
studies carried out at the National Institute of Health
(Rockville, USA). Rat hepatic microsomal fractions in the
presence of an NADPH-generating system were used to
evaluate the metabolism of titled compounds. The results
obtained from liver fraction applications were compared to
the results from the in silico study as well as to the microbio-
logical biotransformation assay in which the Cunninghamella
model was involved.
General Methods
Procedure for the synthesis of 2-(4-chlor-3-methylphenoxy)ethyl]
amino}cyclohexan-1-ol. In the aminolysis reaction, 2.5 g (0.01 mol)
of 1-bromo- 2-( 4’-chloro-3’-methylphenoxy)ethan, 1.2 g (0.01 mol) of
1RS,2RS-trans-2-aminocyclohexan-1-ol, 1.4 g (0.01 mol) of K2CO3, and
20 ml of DMF were used.
The mixture was heated for 5 h. The precipitated KBr was separated.
The filtrate was concentrated and 15 ml of 10%HCL was added. To sepa-
rate the free base –10%NaOH was added to the filtrated. The base was
crystallized from n-hexane (mp. 94-96 °C) with a 48% yield (3). To obtain
R and S enantiomers R or S trans-2-aminocyclohexan-1-ol were used re-
spectively. The S-2-(4-chlor-3-methylphenoxy)ethyl]amino}cyclohexan-1-
ol (compound 2) (mp. 72-74 °C) was obtained with a 42.5% yield and R-
2-(4-chlor-3-methylphenoxy)ethyl]amino}cyclohexan-1-ol (compound 1)
(mp. 72-74 °C) with a 52.5% yield. 1 and 2 were used as hydrochlorides
and their melting points were 163-165 °C and 161-163 °C respectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals and Reagents
Chemical synthesis. Reagents: cyclohexene oxide, L-tartaric acid, 4-
chlor-3-methylphenol, K2CO3 were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Sol-
vents were commercially available materials of reagent grade.
Melting points (mp) are uncorrected and were determined using a
Büchi SMP-20 apparatus (Büchi Labortechnik, Flawil, Switzerland).
Elemental analyses were performed on a Elementar Vario EL III
(Elementar Analysensysteme, Hanau, Germany).
1R,2R trans-{[2-(4-chlor-3-methylphenoxy)ethyl]amino}cyclohexan-
1-ol (compound 1). Anal. Calcd for C15H22ClNO2: C, 63,47; H, 7,83; N,
1
4,93. Found: C, 63,85; H, 7,83; N, 4,93. H NMR (300 MHz, chloroform -d)
The purity of the obtained compounds was confirmed by thin-layer
chromatography (TLC), carried out on precoated aluminum sheets (Silica
Gel, 60 F-254 Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using the solvents indicated
below. Spots were visualized by UV light. Specific rotation was measured
on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter (1% w/v solutions in chloroform, sodium
light 589 nm).
δ ppm 1.04 - 1.20 (m, 2 H) 1.20 - 1.34 (m, 1 H) 1.59 - 1.79 (m, 3 H) 1.91 (d,
J = 14.62 Hz, 2 H) 2.12 (d, J = 12.82 Hz, 1 H) 2.31 (s, 3 H) 2.87 - 2.97 (m, 1 H)
3.28 (br. s., 1 H) 3.46 (br. s., 1 H) 3.74 (tt, J = 10.13, 5.39 Hz, 1 H) 4.26 - 4.42
(m, 2 H) 5.00 (d, J = 6.41 Hz, 1 H) 6.74 (dd, J = 8.72, 3.08 Hz, 1 H) 6.85 (d,
J = 2.82 Hz, 1 H) 7.19 (d, J = 8.72 Hz, 1 H). Rf =0.8 (toluene/methanol 1:1).
[α]20546 = +5.2 [C 0.5; CHCl3]
1H NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 with a Varian
Mercury-VX 300 NMR spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA),
a Bruker Avance II spectrometer (Brucker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with
500.13 MHz, or a Brucker Avance III spectrometer (Brucker, Karlsruhe,
Germany) with 600.2 MHz with TMS or DMSO as an internal standard,
respectively.
1S,2S trans-{[2-(4-chlor-3-methylphenoxy)ethyl]amino}cyclohexan-
1-ol (compound 2). Anal. Calcd for C15H22ClNO2: C, 63,47; H, 7,83; N,
1
4,93. Found: C, 63,42; H, 7,80; N, 4,97. H NMR (300 MHz, chloroform -d)
δ ppm 1.05 - 1.34 (m, 3 H) 1.60 - 1.81 (m, 3 H) 1.86 - 1.96 (m, 1 H) 2.12 (d,
J = 12.57 Hz, 1 H) 2.31 (s, 3 H) 2.86 - 2.98 (m, 1 H) 3.21 - 3.31 (m, 1 H) 3.49
(dt, J = 12.76, 5.03 Hz, 1 H) 3.74 (t, J = 10.13 Hz, 1 H) 4.25 - 4.42 (m, 2 H)
4.97 (br. s., 1 H) 6.74 (dd, J = 8.72, 3.08 Hz, 1 H) 6.85 (d, J = 2.82 Hz, 1 H)
7.19 (d, J = 8.72 Hz, 1 H). Rf =0.8 (toluene/methanol 1:1). [α]20546 = - 5.2 [C
0.5; CHCl3]
The UPLC-MS/MS system consisted of a Waters ACQUITY® UPLC®
(Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a Waters TQD mass
spectrometer (electrospray ionization mode ESI-tandem quadrupole).
Chromatographic separations were carried out using an Acquity UPLC
BEH (bridged ethyl hybrid) C18 column; 2.1 × 100 mm, and 1.7 μm parti-
cle size. The column was maintained at 40 °C, and eluted under gradient
conditions using from 95% to 0% of eluent A over 10 min, at a flow rate of
0.3 ml min-1. Eluent A: water/formic acid (0.1%, v/v); eluent B:
acetonitrile/formic acid (0.1%, v/v). 10 μL of each sample were injected.
Chromatograms were recorded using a Waters λ PDA detector. Spec-
tra were analyzed in 200-700 nm range with 1.2 nm resolution and a sam-
pling rate 20 points/s.
MS detection settings of the Waters TQD mass spectrometer were as
follows: source temperature 150 °C, desolvation temperature 350 °C,
desolvation gas flow rate 600 L h-1, cone gas flow 100 L h-1, capillary poten-
tial 3.00 kV, cone potential 20 V. Nitrogen was used for both nebulizing
and drying gas. The data were obtained in a scan mode ranging from
50 to 1000 m/z in 0.5 s time intervals; 8 scans were summed up to get
the final spectrum.
1RS,2RS trans-{[2-(4-chlor-3-methylphenoxy)ethyl]amino}cyclohexan-
1-ol (compound 3). Anal. Calcd for C15H22ClNO2: C, 63,47; H, 7,83; N,
4,93. Found: C, 63,38; H, 7,96; N, 4,93.1H NMR (300 MHz, chloroform -d) δ
ppm 0.92 - 1.08 (m, 1 H) 1.19 - 1.33 (m, 3 H) 1.68 - 1.78 (m, 2 H) 2.01 - 2.14
(m, 2 H) 2.20 - 2.30 (m, 1 H) 2.33 (s, 3 H) 2.83 (dt, J = 12.57, 4.87 Hz, 1 H)
3.19 (dt, J = 12.31, 5.90 Hz, 2 H) 4.01 (t, J = 5.26 Hz, 2 H) 6.67 (dd, J = 8.72,
2.82 Hz, 1 H) 6.78 (d, J = 2.82 Hz, 1 H) 7.21 (d, J = 8.72 Hz, 1 H). Rf =0.8 (tolu-
ene/methanol 1:1).
Pharmacology. Pharmacological tests were performed at the Epilepsy
Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National
Institutes of Health (Rockville, USA).
All compounds were tested using MES, scMet and neurotoxicity as-
says, after intraperitoneal (ip) injection into male albino mice (Carworth
Farms No. 1) as suspensions in 0.5% methylcellulose at doses of 30,
100, and 300 mg/kg. Observations were carried out after 0.5 h and 4 h af-
ter compound’s administration.12–14
Collision activated dissociation (CAD) analyses were carried out with
energy of 20 eV, and all the fragmentations were observed in the source.
Consequently, the ion spectra were obtained by scanning from 50 to
500 m/z range. The data acquisition software was MassLynx V 4.1
(Waters).
The maximal electroshock test (MES). Seizures were elicited by
60 Hz alternating current at 50 mA (mice) or 150 mA (rats) delivered for
0.2 s via corneal electrodes. A drop of 0.9% NaCl solution was placed into
each eye prior to applying the electrodes. Protection in the MES test is
defined as the abolition of the hindlimb tonic extension component of
the seizure.12–14
Biological biotransformation. Cunninghamella blakesleeana DSM
1906 (which was a gift from A.J. Carnell, University of Liverpool, UK),
was propagated on a Potato-Dextrose-Agar (PDA) plate at 30 °C for
7 days. A fermentation basal medium (20 g D-glucose and 20 g corn step
liquor in 1000 ml of water pH 5.0) was seeded with a 200 μl spore suspen-
sion gained by wetting colonies on solid medium PDA with sterile water.
The media required for the growth of Cunnighamella strains were pur-
chased from BioShop (Canada) (Potato Dextrose Agar) and from
Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) (CSL, Corn Steep Liquor).
The subcutaneous pentetrazole seizure test (scMet). The scMet
was conducted by subcutaneous administration of pentetrazole dissolved
in 0.9% NaCl solution at the dose of 85 mg/kg (mice) or 70 mg/kg (rats)
into animals. A minimal time of 30 min subsequent to sc administration of
pentetrazole was used for seizure detection. A failure to observe even a
threshold seizure (a single episode of clonic spasm of at least 5 s in dura-
tion) was regarded as protection.12–14
Rat liver microsomal fractions as well as components of NADPH
regenerating fraction (NADP+, glucose-6-phosphate, glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich.
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir