Table 1 Physical properties of MeO-CF3DSB and CF3DSB
lab (nm)a
lem (nm)b
Solutionc
Aggregated
Solution (Ffl)c
Solid (Ffl)e
DHfusion (kcal molꢁ1
)
f
f
Dye
Tm (1C)
MeO-CF3DSB
CF3DSB
370 (275)
297
369 (275)
297
487 (o0.010)
409 (o0.010)
490 (0.563)
409 (0.112)
183
149
11.24
6.71
a
b
Absorption maximu, ꢂ1 nm. Emission maximum, ꢂ1 nm; emission spectrum taken at a lex of 380 nm for MeO-CF3DSB and 310 nm for
c
d
e
f
CF3DSB. In THF (10 mM). In a THF/water mixture (10 : 90 by volume). In solid powder form, ꢂ0.002. Analytic results of differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a heating rate of 10 1C minꢁ1 on thermo-equilibrated samples: Tm, melting temperature, ꢂ1 1C; DHfusion energetics
for melting transition, ꢂ0.1 kcal molꢁ1
.
distinct feature. Consistent with the large torsion angle for
CF3DSB (84.31), the torsion angle for MeO-CF3DSB is 78.11.
These large dihedral angles hamper the effective charge transfer
between the lateral phenyl group and the phenylenevinylene
core. As a result, their effective conjugation lengths are much
shorter than all anti-linkage in un-substituted DSB analogues.
Moreover, the methoxy substituents on MeO-CF3DSB pose a
significant influence on molecular packing in solid-state. As
shown in Fig. 4a and Fig. S4,w an interlayer network was
formed along the b axis. In addition to the close contacts along
the columns, a network of close contacts within each column is
also observed.
its emission efficiency can be modulated by fine-tuning the
subtle intermolecular interactions in solid-state. This thorough
investigation provides useful insights for rational design of
highly efficient AIE dyes for optoelectronics and sensing
applications.
The authors thank the support from the National Science
Foundation (DMR-0120967). A. K.-Y. J. thanks the Boeing
Foundation. The authors thank A. Holmes for providing
X-ray data of CF3DSB.
References
1 (a) J. H. Burroughes, D. D. C. Bradley, A. R. Brown, R. N. Marks,
K. Mackay, R. H. Friend, P. L. Nurns and A. B. Holmes, Nature,
1991, 347, 539; (b) J.-L. Bredas, D. Beljonne, V. Coropceanu and
´
MeO-CF3DSB molecules in a crystal form two slipped
columnar stacks with different heights along the b axis. This
arrangement results in a network of short intermolecular
contact (C13–H13Aꢀ ꢀ ꢀ F2–C12 [at (1ꢁx, ꢁ1/2+y, ꢁ1/2ꢁz)],
2.66 A) between the lateral methoxy substituted phenyl rings
of adjacent molecules.
J. Cornil, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 4971.
2 (a) S. Kim, T. Ohulchanskyy, H. Pudavar, R. Pandey and
P. Prasad, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 2669; (b) G. Zhang,
J. Lu, M. Sabat and C. Fraser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 2160;
(c) C. Dou, D. Chen, J. Iqbal, Y. Yuan, H. Zhang and Y. Wang,
Langmuir, 2011, 27, 6323.
The methoxy substituents on the lateral phenyl rings of
MeO-CF3DSB induce rigid and extensively networked contacts
with eight neighboring molecules compared to the relatively
loose intermolecular contact for CF3DSB molecules in crystal
(Fig. S5w). The interactions extend throughout the lattice and
bring each molecule into contact with two other molecules along
a and b axes. These networked contacts not only reinforce the
co-planarity of conjugating path at the core of MeO-CF3DSB,
but also significantly reduce the non-radiative relaxation
pathways to improve the fluorescence efficiency. On the other
hand, the very low luminescence observed for both molecules
in solutions can be explained by the nonradiative decay of the
excited species through various molecular vibrations and
rotations pathways of solvated molecules.
3 J. B. Birks, Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules, Wiley, London, 1970.
4 (a) J. Luo, Z. Xie, J. W. Y. Lam, L. Cheng, H. Chen, C. Qin,
H. S. Kwok, X. Zhan, Y. Liu, D. Zhu and B. Z. Tang, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 1740; (b) Y. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang,
Chem. Commun., 2009, 4332.
5 (a) Y. Yang, X. Su, C. Carroll and I. Aprahamian, Chem. Sci.,
2012, 3, 610; (b) B. Xu, J. He, Y. Dong, F. Chen, W. Yu and
W. Tian, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6602.
6 B.-K. An, S.-K. Kwon, S.-D. Jung and S. Y. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 14410.
7 N. B. Shustova, B. D. McCarthy and M. Dinca, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2011, 133, 20126.
8 A. Lux, A. B. Holmes, R. Cervini, J. E. Davies, S. C. Moratti,
J. Gruner, F. Cacialli and R. H. Friend, Synth. Met., 1997, 84, 293.
¨
9 M. G. Dhara and S. Banerjee, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2010, 35, 1022.
10 Y. Li, F. Li, H. Zhang, Z. Xie, W. Xie, H. Xu, B. Li, F. Shen,
L. Ye, M. Hanif, D. Ma and Y. Ma, Chem. Commun., 2007, 231.
11 K. F. Wong, M. S. Skaf, C. Y. Yang, P. J. Rossky, B. Bagchi,
D. Hu, J. Yu and P. E. Barbara, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 6103.
The reinforced intermolecular interactions resulting from
the incorporation of the methoxy groups on MeO-CF3DSB
were verified by investigating the thermal properties of these
molecules. There is a significant difference in melting points
between MeO-CF3DSB and CF3DSB (183 1C and 149 1C),
which suggests the stronger packing of MeO-CF3DSB. In addition,
MeO-CF3DSB shows 167% higher molecular lattice dissociation
energy, DHfusion, than that of CF3DSB (11.24 kcal molꢁ1 vs.
6.71 kcal molꢁ1) as determined by differential scanning calori-
metry (DSC) and shown in Fig. S6w and Table 1.
12 (a) C. L. Perrin, Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43, 1550; (b) M. Erde
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 3547.
´
lyi,
13 (a) A. E. Reed, L. A. Curtiss and F. Weinhold, Chem. Rev., 1988,
88, 899; (b) J. E. Peralta, R. H. Contreras and J. P. Snyder, Chem.
Commun., 2000, 2025.
14 S. C. Meng, Z. H. Huang, D. Xu, Y. H. Kan and Q. L. Tang, Acta
Chim. Sinica, 2004, 62, 1065.
15 (a) H. Lin, C. Tsai, G. Huang and J. Lin, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
Polym. Chem., 2007, 45, 165; (b) S. Nakatsuji, K. Matsuda,
Y. Uesugi, K. NakaShima, S. Akiyama, G. Katzer and
W. Fabia, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1991, 861.
16 P. A. Wood, F. H. Allen and E. Pidcock, CrystEngComm, 2009,
11, 1563.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that a highly fluorescent
AIE molecule can be made with high quantum yield (56.3%) and
c
7882 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7880–7882
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012