unrearranged bromide. At the highest bromide concentration,
the disappearance of the dimethylbutene is slower than the dis-
appearance of the dimethylbutene in the absence of added salts
and the unrearranged alkyl bromide represents approximately
70% of the product. Using 1.0 iodide ion, greater than 90% of
the addition product is unrearranged.¶ No esters are seen in
either of these cases. The energy barrier for the methyl shift
in the 2,3,3-trimethyl-2-butyl cation has been experimentally
determined11 to be 3.5 0.1 kcal molϪ1. This translates into a
isomerizations were found in any of these reactions although
no efforts were made to exclude oxygen or peroxides. This result
is rarely found6 in HBr addition reactions and is taken as evi-
dence that no HBr is formed during the reaction. It also under-
scores the value of this reagent for the addition of HBr and
DBr to simple alkenes. The ability to add HI to 3,3-dimethyl-
but-1-ene with minimal rearrangement is extremely rare and
suggests that this reagent may find use in similar situations.
rate constant of 1010 Ϫ1 for a methyl shift at room temperature.
s
Experimental
Our methyl shift to a secondary carbocation would be expected
to be faster. A 90% yield of unrearranged product would make
the iodide capture an order of magnitude faster than the methyl
shift. Using 1.5 iodide ion, we could detect no rearranged
product. These considerations put the rate constant for ion pair
collapse to product in the range of 1012 sϪ1 indicating that the
iodide ion must be present when the carbocation is formed.
Rate constants of this magnitude are considered12 to be border-
line between a preassociation mechanism and a concerted
mechanism.
The oct-1-ene (99.5% purity) used in this experiment was
obtained from Fluka Chemical Co. The other alkenes, tri-
fluoroacetic acid and solvents (HPLC grade) were obtained
from Aldrich Chemical Co. and were used without further
purification. The quaternary ammonium salts were obtained
from Fluka Chemical and/or from Aldrich Chemical Co. and
were kept in a desiccator prior to use. The tetrabutylammonium
bromide was dried under vacuum at regular intervals.
Reactions were performed in glass-stoppered volumetric
flasks by adding 1 or|| 2 drops of the alkene** to 5 to†† 100 ml
of the 20% trifluoroacetic acid in methylene chloride solution
containing the quaternary ammonium salt. Aliquots (approxi-
mately 0.5 ml) were removed and quenched with 15 ml of water
and 10 ml of hexanes. The hexanes layer was washed with
another 10 ml of water and dried over anhydrous potassium
carbonate prior to GC–MS analysis. Chromatographic peaks
were identified by their mass spectrum as well as by retention
time of compounds purchased or synthesized and analyzed by
NMR spectroscopy. Weight averaged detector responses for the
octyl bromides relative to oct-1-ene were determined by syn-
thesis of a bromide mixture, adding a known amount of oct-1-
ene and analyzing the mixture by GC–MS. Detector responses
for these secondary alkyl bromides were assumed to be equal.
Relative detector responses for the secondary octyl trifluoro-
acetates were determined in a similar fashion. Relative detector
responses for the diverse octyl halides were assumed to be pro-
portional to the responses for the corresponding cyclohexyl
halides which were analyzed in the usual manner. The second-
ary alkyl trifluoroacetates and halides were shown to be stable
under the reaction conditions. Unless otherwise noted, all reac-
tions were run at room temperature (20 2 ЊC) and showed no
evidence of exothermicity.
The additions of HI were accompanied by some iodide sub-
stitution into the methylene chloride solvent. When this inter-
fered with purification of the product, 1,1,1-trichloroethane
became the preferred reaction solvent. Flash chromatography
was often useful in product purification.
NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL FX90Q spec-
trometer. Proton spectra utilized a deuterium lock and TMS as
internal reference. Deuterium spectra utilized a lithium lock
and CDCl3 (δ 7.24) as the internal reference. Mass spectra and
chromatographic analyses were performed on a Hewlett-
Packard 5890 Chromatograph with a 12 m HP-1 capillary
column and a 5971A mass selective detector.
While most workers in this area have described the electro-
philic addition of hydrogen halides to alkenes as a competition
between bimolecular and termolecular mechanisms, it appears
that the halide ions are not covalently involved in the transition
states leading to ion pair intermediates. We have considered the
possibility of a competition between an AdE2 cation sandwich
mechanism and an AdE3 unsymmetrical concerted mechanism
but the kinetic independence of bromide ion makes the latter
unlikely. The efficient trapping of a 3,3-dimethyl-2-butyl cation
is remarkable and supports the case for concertedness only in
the most extreme situations.
We believe that our results are best explained by the slow
protonation of the alkene assisted by variable halide partici-
pation. In a non-polar solvent, low concentrations of anions
will assist the protonation of neutral bases (e.g. nitroanilines)
and, similarly, assist the proton transfer to an alkene. The
resulting ion pair undergoes the reactions expected from
cations. Higher concentrations of salts make protonation of
both species more difficult. The weaker proton donating solu-
tion inhibits the protonation thus requiring greater halide ion
participation, more efficient trapping of the intermediate cation
and, perhaps, eventually cause a concerted reaction. This will
lead to increasing proportions of unrearranged alkyl halide
product. This mechanism, with variable nucleophilic partici-
pation, is reminiscent of the suggestions13 for a nucleophilic
substitution mechanism intermediate between the SN1 and SN2
limiting cases.
Since we have skewed the reaction conditions much further
toward non-ionic reaction conditions than any other similar
reaction that we can find, we expect that truly concerted ter-
molecular additions of hydrogen halides to alkenes are extremely
rare. Furthermore, since the iodide ion is an optimal nucleo-
phile in strongly acidic solutions, it seems unlikely that there are
many cases of acid catalyzed additions to alkenes which do not
involve a carbocationic intermediate. We believe that the partial
stereoselectivity found in additions of hydrogen halides to
alkenes derives from the ion sandwich mechanism rather than
from a true concerted addition. The inability of most reaction
conditions to prevent the rearrangement of the dimethylbutyl
cation supports this view.
Tetra-n-butylammonium trifluoroacetate
A 25 ml sample of tetra-n-butylammonium hydroxide (Fluka
Chemical) was neutralized with trifluoroacetic acid, then
cooled and extracted with two 50 ml portions of methylene
chloride which were rotary evaporated to a thick syrup. Appli-
cation of a high vacuum for 24 h produced a thick mass which
was broken up and dried by vacuum for another 24 h at 65 ЊC.
The resulting white powder melted at 81–82 ЊC (Found: C,
It should be noted that oct-1-ene, cyclohexene and 3,3-
dimethylbut-1-ene all appear to react by the same termolecular
cation sandwich mechanism at the lower bromide concen-
trations.
No anti-Markovnikov products and no radical induced
|| Results from 1 or 2 drops of alkene (approximately 10Ϫ4 mol) are iden-
tical within our experimental uncertainty.
¶ Under these conditions, the addition of HI to 3-methylbut-1-ene also
produces greater than 90% unrearranged product. This product ratio
remains unchanged in the reaction for more than ten weeks. The 2,3-
dimethyl-2-iodobutane appears to be somewhat less stable.
** In all kinetic studies, a preanalyzed mixture of alkene and decane was
used.
†† At least 10Ϫ3 mol of bromide ion was used.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1998
1521