Paper
RSC Advances
the C]N bond, which is a chromophore of RhB. Degradation of other hand, the bond energy of the azo bond of MO was higher
MO was achieved through demethylation and cleavage of the than the bond energy of the C]N bond of RhB. Thus, it is easier
azo bond.
for cO2ꢀ and cOH to destroy the C]N bond of RhB than the azo
Chemical bonds with different bond energies are destroyed bond of MO under the same conditions, and the subsequent
during degradation of dyes. It is more difficult to destroy a bond process of degradation of RhB is easier to carry out. The pho-
ꢀ
with a higher bond energy. Carbon–carbon bonds (C–C) and tocatalytic degradation of MO in a system in which cO2 is key
carbon–nitrogen bonds (C–N) were destroyed during N-deethy- active species can be improved by adding hole scavengers to
lation of RhB and demethylation of MO, respectively. The inhibit recombination of holes and electrons, which would
ꢀ
processes of N-deethylation and demethylation could be carried result in more electrons reducing O2 to cO2
out successfully because the bond energy of C–C was almost the
.
same as that of C–N.
Acknowledgements
However, the C]N bond of RhB has a bond energy of about
407 kJ molꢀ1, while the bond energy of the azo bond of MO is This work was supported by the National Natural Science
about 518 kJ molꢀ1 37 Therefore, it is easier for cO2ꢀ and cOH to Foundation of China [Grant No. 51278408]; Shanxi Province
.
destroy the C]N bond of RhB than the azo bond of MO under Science and Technology Youth Star Project [Grant No.
the same conditions, and the subsequent process of degrada- 2014KJXX-65] and the innovative research team of Xi'an
tion of RhB is easier to carry out. Thus, photocatalytic degra- University of Architecture and Technology.
dation of RhB is superior to the degradation of MO under the
same conditions. Above all, the differences in photocatalytic
performance of ZnIn2S4 for the degradation of RhB and MO
References
were mainly due to the different adsorptivity of ZnIn2S4 for RhB
and MO, and the different chemical bonds of RhB and MO that
were destroyed during the photocatalytic process.
1 S. Hisaindee, M. Meetani and M. Rauf, TrAC, Trends Anal.
Chem., 2013, 49, 31.
2 J. Gao, S. Yang, N. Li, L. Meng, F. Wang, H. He and C. Sun,
Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 379, 140.
3 W. Liu, L. Liu, C. Liu, Y. Hao, H. Yang, B. Yuan and J. Jiang,
Biochem. Eng. J., 2016, 110, 115.
4 A. Umar, M. Akhtar, A. Al-Hajry, M. Al-Assiri, G. Dar and
M. Islam, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 262, 588.
5 S. Ameena, M. Akhtarb, Y. Kim and H. Shina, Appl. Catal., B,
2011, 103, 136.
6 Y. Wang and W. Chu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 186, 1455.
7 C. Tang, L. Liu, Y. Li and Z. Bian, Appl. Catal., B, 2017, 201,
41.
8 B. Parea, S. B. Jonnalagaddab, H. Tomara, P. Singha and
V. W. Bhagwata, Desalination, 2008, 232, 80.
9 X. Li, J. Wang, Y. Men and Z. Bianc, Appl. Catal., B, 2016, 187,
115.
The active species generated during the photocatalytic
process for the degradation of RhB were the same as those
generated during the photocatalytic degradation of MO; thus,
the active species are not the main factors causing the different
photocatalytic performance for the degradation of RhB and MO
by ZnIn2S4. RhB was effectively degraded, but a smaller
percentage of MO was degraded during the photocatalytic
ꢀ
process in which cO2 was the key active species. MO could be
degraded more effectively by adding hole scavengers to inhibit
recombination of holes and electrꢀons, which would result in
more electrons reducing O2 to cO2 and improving the degra-
dation of MO. The conclusions may provide a theoretical basis
for improved degradation of dyes.
10 Z. Lei, J. Wang, L. Wang, X. Yang, G. Xu and L. Tang, J.
Hazard. Mater., 2016, 312, 298.
4. Conclusions
A comprehensive study of the different photocatalytic perfor- 11 P. Reddy Prasad, A. Ofomaja and E. Naidoo, Appl. Surf. Sci.,
mance of the degradation of different dyes under visible light 2015, 327, 13.
irradiation was carried out in this study. Several conclusions 12 X. Hu, C. Hu and R. Wang, Appl. Catal., B, 2015, 176–177,
can be summarized as follows. 637.
Adsorption of RhB on ZnIn2S4 was higher than that of MO. 13 H. Hu, C. Deng, J. Xu, Q. Zheng, G. Chen and X. Ge, Mater.
ꢀ
cO2 is key active species for degradation of RhB and MO by
Lett., 2015, 161, 17.
ZnIn2S4 under visible light irradiation, and cOH played 14 B. Priya, P. Raizada, N. Singh, P. Thakur and P. Singh, J.
a supplementary role during the photocatalytic process. Path- Colloid Interface Sci., 2016, 479, 271.
ways for the photocatalytic degradation of RhB and MO by 15 F. Fang, L. Chen, Y. Chen and L. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010,
ZnIn2S4 are proposed according to identication of intermedi- 114, 2393.
ates using LCMS-IT-TOF. RhB was degraded through N-dee- 16 S. Shen, L. Zhao and L. Guo, Mater. Res. Bull., 2009, 44, 100.
thylation and cleavage of the C]N bond, which is 17 X. Li, P. Zhang, L. Jin, T. Shao, Z. Li and J. Cao, Environ. Sci.
a chromophore of RhB. Degradation of MO was achieved
through demethylation and cleavage of the azo bond.
Technol., 2012, 46, 5528.
18 H. Zhou and D. Smith, Environ. Eng. Sci., 2002, 4, 247.
Photocatalytic degradation of RhB was superior to the 19 K. Wang, J. Xu, X. Hua, N. Li, M. Chen, F. Teng, Y. Zhu and
degradation of MO under the same conditions. On the one W. Yao, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2014, 393, 302.
hand, the adsorption of RhB on ZnIn2S4 was higher than that of 20 Y. Chen, R. Huang, D. Chen, Y. Wang, W. Liu, X. Li and Z. Li,
MO, which further affected photocatalytic performance. On the
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 2273.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 12292–12300 | 12299