Page 3 of 5
Journal of the American Chemical Society
(Figures 3b and 3d). Notably, compared to microribbon 3, microꢀ
showed that the blue fluorescence gradually turned into yellow
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ribbon 4 exhibited a much slower photochemical reaction that
took ca. 2 h to finish the emission changes (Figure 3d). To further
compare the photodecarbonylation rate in microribbons 1-4, we
used Fourierꢀtransform infrared (FTꢀIR) spectroscopy to realꢀtime
monitor the vibration intensity changes of O=Cꢀ group under the
UV irradiation (5 mW/cm2). As shown in Figure S4, for microribꢀ
bons 1 and 2, the adsorption peak of O=Cꢀ group at 1840 cmꢀ1
quickly disappeared after 9 s and 16 s, respectively. For microribꢀ
bons 3 and 4, however, this characteristic peak slowly disappeared
after 10 min and 120 min, respectively. These observations conꢀ
sisted well with the aforementioned photoresponses observed
under CSLM.
with increasing the UV irradiation time (Figure 4cꢀd and Movie
S3), indicative of the production of DPA from DPCP via the phoꢀ
tochemical decarbonylation. Moreover, the rate of the fluoresꢀ
cence change of microribbon 3 was much faster than that of miꢀ
croribbon 4 (Figure 4cꢀd), similar to those in Figure 3. Interestingꢀ
ly, XRD characterization of microribbons 3 and 4 before and after
the UV irradiation indicated that their crystal structures did not
change despite the large changes in molecular volume caused by
the photochemical decarbonylation (Figure S7). Furthermore,
SEM imaging displayed that the surface of microribbons 3 and 4
remained smooth after UV irradiation (Figure S8). These results
indicated that the molecular interactions in 3 and 4 microribbons
were strong enough to endure the impact of large molecular volꢀ
ume changes by UV irradiation and maintain their total original
ordered structure.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
To further demonstrate that the distinctly different photoreꢀ
sponsive properties of singleꢀcrystal microribbons 1-4 were atꢀ
tributed by the different intermolecular interactions engineered in
crystals but not by the slight difference of molecular structures 1-
4 at the molecular level, the photodecarbonylation reaction of
molecules 1-4 was investigated in solution phase. Figure S9
shows the timeꢀdependent fluorescence changes of molecules 1-4
acetonitrile solution (5 mM) under UV irradiation (365 ± 20 nm,
9.6 mW/cm2). Apparently, the solution photodecarbonylation
rates of molecules 1-4 were very similar and the photodecarꢀ
bonylation could be efficiently finished in ca. 11 min for all cases.
This strongly indicated that the difference of molecular structures
1-4 with different groups on phenyl groups (ortho versus para,
methoxy versus hydroxyl) had no effect on their photodecarꢀ
bonylation reactions at the molecular level. Resultantly, the comꢀ
parable photodecarbonylation of molecules 1-4 at the molecular
level confirmed that the different photoresponsive properties of
singleꢀcrystal microribbons 1-4 were attributed by the different
intermolecular interactions engineered in crystals. In addition, no
apparent fluorescence was observed in Figure S9 for molecules 1-
4 acetonitrile solution with UV irradiation less than ca. 8 min.
This is because the fluorescence spectra of the photodecarbonylaꢀ
tion products partly overlapped with the UVꢀVis adsorption specꢀ
tra of the reactants 1-4 (Figure S10). In this case, the fluorescence
of the small amounts of photodecarbonylation products were abꢀ
sorbed by the large amounts of unreacted reactants at the initial
stage of the reaction.
Figure 4. (a, b) Brightꢀfield optical microscopy image of the phoꢀ
tomelting of microribbon 1 (a) and the photodeforming of microꢀ
ribbon 2 (b) upon the UV light irradiation. (c, d) Fluorescenceꢀ
mode optical microscopy image of the photoresponse of microꢀ
ribbons 3 (c) and 4 (d). Scale bar represented 10 ꢁm.
We next investigated the photodecarbonylation and the resultꢀ
ing photoresponses of microribbons 1-4 with entire UV irradiation
(365±5 nm) under optical microscopy (Figure 4). As shown in
Figure 4a and Movie S1, microribbon 1 deposited on a glass slide
rapidly collapsed and melted in ca. 15 s under UV irradiation,
indicating that the rapid photochemical decarbonylation in microꢀ
ribbon 1 destroyed the ordered crystal structure. In addition, Xꢀray
diffraction (XRD) characterization of microribbon 1 before and
after 15 s UV irradiation confirmed that the single crystal strucꢀ
ture of microribbon 1 completely disappeared and the amorphous
DPA products were simultaneously formed (Figure S5a). Unlike
microribbon 1, microribbon 2 didn’t collapse and melt but deꢀ
formed from the photochemical decarbonylation upon UV irradiaꢀ
tion (Figure 4b and Movie S2). XRD characterization of the miꢀ
croribbon 2 before and after the UV irradiation indicated that the
volume changes from DPCP to DCA and CO only partially deꢀ
stroyed the crystal structure and part of the ordered structure still
remained (Figure S5b). SEM imaging revealed that the smooth
surface of microribbon 2 granulated, similar to that in Figure 2d.
Apparently, the weak molecular interactions in microribbon 1 was
not enough to maintain the ordered structure when large molecuꢀ
lar volume changes took place upon UV irradiation, while the
relatively strong molecular interactions in microribbon 2 could
keep part of original crystal structure under similar conditions.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the quantum chain reacꢀ
tion and the photoresponsive property could be effectively conꢀ
trolled by the magnitude of molecular interactions involved in
DPCP crystals. Specifically, the weak molecular interactions
yielded a relatively low energy barrier for the molecular volume
changes in the photoreaction, which facilitated the propagation of
the chain reaction and the creation of large mechanically photoreꢀ
sponsive properties, e.g., photomelting for microribbon 1 and
photodeforming for microribbon 2. In contrast, the strong molecuꢀ
lar interactions in microribbons 3 and 4 hindered the chain reacꢀ
tion and mechanical morphology changes. These findings providꢀ
ed valuable information for crystal engineering of molecular maꢀ
terials with enhanced mechanical photoresponses.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
This hypothesis was again supported by the photoresponsive
behavior of microribbons 3 and 4. As shown in Figure S6, no
photoresponse was observed under brightꢀfield optical microscoꢀ
py even upon elongated UV irradiation for both cases. However,
fluorescence optical microscopy imaging of microribbons 3 and 4
Author Contributions
‡These authors contributed equally.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment