96
H. Matsuura et al. / Phytochemistry 65 (2004) 91–97
Hz), 4.26 (2H, m), 3.78 (6H, s), 3.74–3.56 (3H, com-
plex), 2.26 (3H, s), 2.12 (3H, s), 2.04 (3H, s), 2.02 (3H,
s), 2.00 (3H, s), 1.99 (3H, s). 13C NMR (67.5 MHz,
CDCl3): ꢁ 170.0, 169.8, 169.4, 169.2, 168.3, 166.2, 152.1,
145.6, 134.1, 134.0, 130.3, 128.7, 128.1, 117.0, 103.9,
101.0, 74.0, 73.6, 72.6, 71.9, 71.2, 68.6, 67.2, 62.0, 56.2,
21.0, 20.9, 20.7, 20.6, 20.5.
ice bath was added excess CH2N2, and the reaction
ꢁ
mixture was further stirred at 0 C for 1 h. The volatile
components were removed under reduced pressure to
give a residue. The residue was reduced using LAH (182
mg) in THF (50 ml) to give 7 (250 mg, 28%)
3.10.1. 3-(30, 40, 50-Trimethoxyphenyl) prop-2-en-1-ol
(7)
3.8. Preparation of (7S, 8S)-syringoylglycerol (4)
IR ꢃmax (NaCl) cmꢀ1: 3405, 2940, 1584, 1507, 1240,
1127, 1008; EI-MS m/z (rel. int): 224 (100), 195 (29), 182
1
To a stirred mixture of 2 (146 mg, 0.27 mmol) in 3 ml
of 0.1 N AcONH4–HOAc buffer (pH 5.6) was added b-
glucosidase (5 mg), and the mixture was shaken (100
(57), 181 (59), 83 (28); H NMR (270 MHz, CD3OD): ꢁ
6.61 (2H, s), 6.53 (1H, d, J= 15.9 Hz), 6.28 (1H, dt, J=
15.9, 5.4 Hz), 4.32 (1H, d, J= 5.4 Hz), 3.87 (6H, s), 3.84
(3H, s).
ꢁ
rpm) at 37 C for 24 h. The mixture was put directly
onto the cartridge column of Bond Elut C18. The col-
umn was washed with H2O (3 ml ꢂ 3) and then with
MeOH–H2O (7:3) (3 ml ꢂ 3). The volatile components
of the MeOH–H2O (7:3) eluents were removed to give 4
(45 mg, 0.18 mmol, 67%).
3.11. Preparation of (7R, 8R)-4-O-methylsyringoyl-
glycerol (8)
To a stirred mixture of CH3SO2NH2 (64 mg, 0.67
mmol) and AD-mix-b (929 mg) in a solution of t-
BuOH–H2O (1:1) (3 ml) was added a solution of 7 (150
mg, 0.67 mmol) in a solution of t-BuOH–H2O (1:1) (7
3.8.1. (7S, 8S)-Syringoylglycerol (4)
FD–MS m/z (rel. int.) 244 [M]+ (100); IR ꢃmax (NaCl)
cmꢀ1: 3360, 2940, 1614, 1519, 1463, 1428, 1216, 1113,
ꢁ
ml). The reaction mixture was stirred at 4 C for 24 h.
1
750; H NMR (270 MHz, CD3OD): ꢁ 6.70 (2H, s), 4.55
To the reaction mixture was added sodium sulfite (640
mg, 5.1 mmol), and the mixture further stirred for 1 h at
room temp. The reaction mixture was poured into a
mixture of EtOAc (300 ml) and H2O (150 ml). The
EtOAc layer was washed with satd. aq. NaCl (50 ml ꢂ
2) and dried over Na2SO4. The volatile components of
the EtOAc layer was removed under reduced pressure to
give a residue, which was purified by preparative TLC
(MeOH–CHCl3 9:41) to afford 8 (15 mg, 0.058 mmol,
9%).
(1H, d, J= 5.9 Hz), 3.86 (3H, s), 3,69 (1H, m), 3.50 (1H,
dd, J= 11.2, 3.7 Hz), 3.30 (1H, dd, J= 11.2, 6.2 Hz);
13C NMR (67.5 MHz, CD3OD): ꢁ 148.9, 135.8, 133.9,
105.0, 77.5, 75.5, 64.2, 56.7.
3.9. Preparation of (7S, 8S)-4-O-methylsyringoyl-
glycerol (5)
To a stirred mixture of 4 (16 mg, 0.065 mmol) in
MeOH (10 ml) cooled with an ice bath was added excess
CH2N2. The reaction mixture was further stirred for 1 h
3.11.1. (7R, 8R)-4-O-Methylsyringoylglycerol (8)
[ꢀ]2D3 ꢀ17.0ꢁ (c=0.50, MeOH); HR-EI-MS m/z:
258.1115 [M]+ (calc. for C12H18O6: 258.1103).
ꢁ
at 0 C. The volatile components were removed under
reduced pressure to give a colorless residue, which was
purified using preparative TLC (MeOH–CHCl3 1:9) to
afford 5 (5.9 mg, 0.022 mmol, 35%).
3.12. Alkaline hydrolysis of 2
3.9.1. (7S, 8S)-4-O-Methylsyringoylglycerol (5)
[ꢀ]2D3 21.1ꢁ (c=0.59, MeOH) ; EI-MS m/z (rel. int): 258
(34), 198 (12), 197 (100), 196 (34), 169 (41), 154 (17), 138
(20); HR-EI-MS m/z: 258.1096 [M]+ (calc. for C12H18O6:
258.1103); IR ꢃmax (NaCl) cmꢀ1: 3383, 2940, 1593, 1506,
1463, 1422, 1328, 1235, 1125, 1005, 754; 1H NMR
(CD3OD, 500 MHz); ꢁ 6.71 (2H, s, H-20 and -60), 4.59 (1H,
d, J=2.9 Hz, H-3), 3.84 (6H, s, C-30-OMe and C-50-OMe),
3.74 (3H, s, C-40-OMe), 3.67 (1H, m, H-2), 3.54 (1H, dd,
J=6.1, 2.4 Hz, H-1a), 3.40 (1H, dd, J=6.1, 3.3 Hz, H-1b).
To a stirred solution of 1% NaOH/EtOH (25 ml) was
added a solution of 2 (25 mg, 0.046 mmol) in MeOH (10
ml), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h. The
reaction mixture was treated with the resins of amberlite
120 B (Organo, 150 g). The resins was washed with
MeOH (50 ml). The combined eluents were con-
centrated under reduced pressure, and the resultant
residue was dissolved in 1 ml of MeOH–H2O (1:9) and
put onto the cartridge column of Bond Elut C18. T he
column was washed with MeOH–H2O (1:9) (3 ml ꢂ 2)
and then with MeOH–H2O (4:1) (3 ml ꢂ 2). The eluate
of MeOH–H2O (1:9) was concentrated under reduced
pressure to give 1 (14 mg, 0.035 mmol, 76%), and the
eluate of MeOH–H2O (4:1) to afford 10 (50 mg, 0.034
mmol, 74%).
3.10. Preparation of (2E) 3-(30, 40, 50-trimethoxyphenyl)
prop-2-en-1-ol (7)
To a stirred mixture of 3, 4, 5-trimethoxycinnamic
acid (6, 952 mg, 4 mmol) in MeOH (20 ml) cooled with