Novel Inhibitors of CPG2
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1999, Vol. 42, No. 6 955
34 min in phosphate buffer at pH 7.3 and 37 °C.19 Anal.
(C13H15NO6S) C,H,N.
N-(p-Meth oxyph en ylth iocar bon yl)-D-glu tam ic acid (6e):
1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.20 (1H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, NH),
7.10 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, ArH), 6.7 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, ArH),
3.9 (1H, m, CH), 3.5 (3H, s, OMe), 2.1 (2H, m, CH2), 1.6 (2H,
m, CH2); mp 110 °C. Anal. (C13H15NO6S) C,H,N.
N-(m -Met h oxyp h en ylt h ioca r b on yl)-L-glu t a m ic a cid
(6f): 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.80-6.60 (5H, m, ArH,
NH), 4.10 (1H, m, CH), 3.65 (3H, s, OMe), 2.40-1.60 (4H, m,
[CH2]2). Anal. (C13H15NO6S) C,H,N.
N-(p-Meth ylp h en ylth ioca r bon yl)-L-glu ta m ic a cid (6g):
1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.4-12.5 (2H, b, COOH),
8.55(1H, d, CONH), 7.35 (2H, d, J ) 8 Hz, ArH), 7.24 (2H, d,
J ) 8 Hz, ArH), 4.27-4.14 (1H, m, CH), 2.40-2.22 (5H, m,
CH3 + CH2), 2.09-1.92 (1H, m, CH2), 1.91-1.73 (1H, m, CH2).
Anal. (C13H15NO5S) C,H,N.
N-(m -Meth ylp h en ylth ioca r bon yl)-L-glu ta m ic a cid (6h ):
1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.4-12.5 (2H, b, COOH),
8.60 (1H, d, CONH), 7.34-7.19 (4H, m, ArH), 4.26-4.14 (1H,
m, CH), 2.38-2.24 (5H, m, CH3 +CH2), 2.09-1.92 (1H, m,
CH2), 1.90-1.73 (1H, m, CH2). Anal. (C13H15NO5S‚H2O) C,H,N.
N-(p-Br om op h en ylth ioca r bon yl)-L-glu ta m ic a cid (6i):
1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.4-12.5 (2H, b, COOH),
8.71 (1H, d, CONH), 7.61 (2H, d, J ) 8 Hz, ArH), 7.42 (2H, d,
J ) 8 Hz, ArH), 4.27-4.14 (1H, m, CH), 2.39-2.29 (2H, m,
CH3 +CH2), 2.09-1.91 (1H, m, CH2), 1.91-1.73 (1H, m, CH2).
Anal. (C13H12NO5SBr) C,H,N.
N-(p-Ch lor op h en ylth ioca r bon yl)-L-glu ta m ic a cid (6j):
1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.4-12.5 (2H, b, COOH),
8.71 (1H, d, CONH), 7.49 (4H, s, ArH), 4.28-4.16 (1H, m, CH),
2.38-2.28 (2H, m, CH3 + CH2), 2.09-1.91 (1H, m, CH2), 1.91-
1.73 (1H, m, CH2). Anal. (C13H12NO5SCl) C,H,N.
buffer). CPG2 (38.13 mg/mL, 350 U/mg) was diluted in assay
buffer to make a stock solution of 28.66 µg/mL; 10 U/mL
concentrations shown in the text are final concentrations after
all the incubation solutions are combined. One unit of CPG2
activity corresponds to 1 µmol of methotrexate hydrolyzed
min-1 21
. All values for the initial velocity were calculated from
the progress curve using the computer-assisted spectropho-
tometer (molar extinction coefficient of methotrexate is 8300).
Hyperbolic saturation curves were obtained by measuring
CPG2 activity at varying methotrexate concentration and
different fixed 6d concentration. Methotrexate concentration
was varied between 3.077 and 70 µM, while 6d was at fixed
concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0 µM; 10 µL of stock CPG2 was
placed in a 1-mL cuvette, the reaction was initiated by adding
990 µL of methotrexate alone or methotrexate containing 6d ,
and the decrease in absorbance at 320 nm was recorded over
a time interval of 0-60 s. To obtain values for apparent Km
and apparent Vmax, the data was fitted by the least-squares
fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation using Fig.P (Biosoft)
computer program. The pattern of 6d inhibition with respect
to methotrexate was illustrated by using a double-reciprocal
(Lineweaver-Burk) plot of the data. Concentrations shown in
the text are final concentrations after all the incubation
solutions are combined.
Cytotoxicity Stu d ies. 1. Gen er a l Meth od for Cytotox-
icity of P oten tia l CP G2 In h ibitor s. To determine cytotox-
icity of the inhibitor, cells were incubated with graded con-
centration of inhibitor for 1 h at 37 °C. The cytotoxicity of each
potential inhibitor against LS174T cells was also determined
by exposing the cells to graded concentrations of particular
inhibitor (0.01-500 µM in medium) for 1 h at 37 °C. After each
treatment the cells were washed once with medium and
incubated for a further 6 days. Cell survival for all the
experiments was measured by the SRB assay.22
2. In Vitr o In h ibition of CP G2 Activa tion of P r od r u g
(P GP ) by 6d . To demonstrate in vitro inhibition of CPG2
turnover of prodrug (PGP), Figure 1, in the presence of 6d ,
LS174T cells were treated as follows: (a) To determine the
cytoxicity of parent drug (phenol mustard) produced in situ
by the action of the antibody-enzyme conjugate, the cells were
incubated with 100 µL of F(ab′)2-A5B7-CPG2 (3.32 µg/mL,
0.505 U/mL) at 37 °C for 1 h. The cells were then washed two
times in 200 µL of medium to remove excess conjugate which
had not bound to the cells, followed by incubation with 200
µL of graded concentration of prodrug (PGP) (0.01-500 µM
in medium) for 1 h at 37 °C. (b) To determine inhibition of
cytotoxicity in the presence of 6d , the cells were incubated with
100 µL of F(ab′)2-A5B7-CPG2 (3.32 µg/mL, 0.505 U/mL) for 1
h at 37 °C. The cells were then washed two times in 200 µL of
medium to remove unbound conjugate, followed by incubation
with graded concentration of PGP plus 25 or 50 µM 6d for 1 h
at 37 °C. (c) To determine cytotoxicity of the PGP alone, this
was carried out as described above for the potential inhibitors.
All of the synthesized compounds (Table 1) were then tested
to determine their CPG2 inhibitory properties using the Dixon
plot. The Dixon plot was chosen for the preliminary screen to
determine the apparent Ki.20 In addition, the cytotoxicity (IC50
)
of each compound was also determined.
Deter m in a tion of Ap p a r en t Ki. Assay solutions were set
up with varying inhibitor concentrations (0-3.0 µM) at dif-
ferent concentrations of methotrexate; 10 µL (0.1 U) of stock
enzyme solution was dispensed into 1-mL cuvettes, and
reaction was started by the addition of 990 µL of assay
solutions.
Enzyme solution (10 µL) was dispensed into 1-mL cuvettes,
and inhibitor solutions (990 µL) were added. The initial rate
of decrease of absorbance was measured spectrophotometri-
cally at 320 nm in a Shimadzu UV 1601 spectrophotometer.
The reciprocal of the initial velocity, 1/V, was plotted against
the micromolar (µM) concentrations of inhibitor to give the
20
linear Dixon plot from which apparent Ki was obtained, as
shown in Table 1.
Biologica l Stu d ies. 1. Cell Lin e. The human colon ad-
enocarcinoma cell line, LS174T, which expresses carcinoem-
bryonic antigen (CEA) was obtained from the European
Animal Cell Culture Collection.
2. En zym e a n d An tibod y-En zym e Con ju ga te. Bacterial
enzyme CPG2 and a conjugate of the F(ab′)2 fragment of the
mouse anti-CEA antibody, A5B7, and the antibody enzyme
conjugate (F(ab′)2-A5B7-CPG2) were kindly provided by Dr.
R. G. Melton, Division of Biotechnology, Centre for Applied
Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wilts,
SP4 OJ G, U.K.
The most promising of the compounds listed in Table 1 were
then subjected to screening against LS174T cell lines for their
capacity to abrogate in vitro cytotoxicity in the presence of
enzyme and the prodrug N-p-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]phe-
noxycarbonyl-L-glutamic acid (PGP), Figure 1.
Compound 6d was chosen due to its low toxicity and best
inhibition of CPG2 and was thus studied in depth, to determine
its mode of inhibition and its capacity to suppress enzyme
activity in vitro.
Ack n ow led gm en t. We are very grateful to Dr. G.
Rogers, Dr. R. G. Melton, Dr. R. Sherwood, and Prof.
R. J . Knox for their kind assistance. We also thank
Enzacta Ltd. for financial support.
Refer en ces
(1) (a) Melton, R. G.; Sherwood, R. F. Antibody-Enzyme conjugates
for therapy (Review). J . Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996, 88, 153-165.
(b) Melton, R. G.; Connors, T.; Knox, R. J . The use of Prodrugs
in Targeted Anticancer Therapies. STP Pharma Sci. 1999, in
press. (c) Enzyme-prodrug strategies for cancer therapy; Melton,
R. G., Knox, R. J ., Eds.; Plenum: London, 1999; in press.
(2) Bagshawe, K. D. Antibody directed enzymes revive anti-cancer
prodrugs concept. Br. J . Cancer 1987, 56, 531-532.
(3) (a) Antoniw, P. A study of the pharmacology of different prodrugs
in conjunction with targeted antibody-enzyme conjugate in
human cancer therapy. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London,
Charing Cross and Westminter Medical School, London, U.K.,
1991. (b) Sharma, S. K.; Bagshawe, K. D.; Burke, P. J .; Boden,
J . A.; Rogers, G. T.; Springer, C. J .; Melton, R. G.; Sherwood, R.
F. Galactosylated antibodies and antibody-enzyme conjugates
in antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. Cancer 1994, 73,
1114-1120.
3. Kin etics. All kinetics were performed at 37 °C in 0.1 M
Tris-HCl, pH 7.3, buffer containing 0.1 mM zinc chloride (assay