1226
D. J. Lauffer, M. D. Mullican / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1225–1227
impractical and lengthy and require a late stage resolu-
tion.17 Herein, we describe a short, high yielding, and
versatile synthesis 4 from BOC-(l)-2,3-diaminopro-
pionic acid (Scheme 1). The utility of 4 as a versatile
dipeptidomimetic is demonstrated in the synthesis of 13,
a potent ICE inhibitor (Scheme 2).
BOC-(R)-2,3-diaminopropionic acid. The Ki’s of 13 and
its C(3) amino group diastereomer are 90 and 850 nM,
respectively.22
In conclusion, we have described an efficient four-step
synthesis of( S) 3-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-2-oxo-2,3,
4,5-tetrahydro-1,5-benzodiazepine-1-acetic acid methyl
ester (4), from BOC-(l)-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (5)
in >50% overall yield. We have demonstrated the
regioselective functionalization of N(1), N(5), and the
C(3) nitrogens and utilized this dipeptide mimetic in 13,
a potent ICE inhibitor. The advantage ofscaffold 4 over
previously reported scaffolds is that it allows for the
broad exploration ofthe P3, thus providing an oppor-
tunity to improve potency and physical properties of
compounds in this class.
The aromatic nucleophilic substitution reaction of
1-fluoro-2-nitrobenzene (6) and BOC-(l)-2,3-diamino-
proprionic acid (5) in the presence ofNaHCO 3 in DMF
afforded product 7.18 Reduction ofthe nitro group by
catalytic hydrogenolysis followed by water-soluble car-
bodiimide mediated cyclization gave 9 in good yield.19
Regioselective alkylation ofthe lactam nitrogen in the
presence ofbis(trimethylsilyl)amide afforded the desired
intermediate 4.20
Deprotection ofthe N-tert-butoxycarbonyl group was
achieved via anhydrous HCl to afford the amine
hydrochloride salt that was coupled with benzoic acid to
afford the N-benzoyl derivative 10. Acylation with
3-phenylpropionyl chloride followed by base hydrolysis
ofthe methyl ester gave the acetic acid derivative 11.
Reaction ofsemicarbazone 12 with the acid 11 followed
by deprotection21 afforded the desired aldehyde 13
(Scheme 2). Proton NMR ofthe penultimate hydrazone
indicated the presence ofonly one diastereomer and
confirmed by the synthesis ofthe R isomer of 4 from
Acknowledgements
We thank Mark A. Murcko, Guy W. Bemis, and Keith
P. Wilson for their collaboration in the design of 13,
Roger D. Tung, M. Woods Wannamaker, and Brian E.
Ledford for helpful comments on the manuscript, and
David J. Livingston for helpful discussions.
References and Notes
1. Thornberry, N. A.; Lazebnik, Y. Science 1998, 281, 1312.
2. For a recent review ofICE inhibitors, see: Livingston, D. L.
H. Cell Biochem. 1997, 64, 19. Giegel, D. A.; Kostlan, C. R.
Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 1998, 33, 183.
3. Chapman, K. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1992, 2, 613.
4. Thornberry, N. A.; Peterson, E. P.; Zhao, J. J.; Howard,
A. D.; Griffin, P. R.; Chapman, K. T. Biochemistry 1992, 33,
3934.
5. Ku, G.; Faust, T.; Lauffer, L. L.; Livingston, D. J.; Hard-
ing, M. W. Cytokine 1996, 8, 377.
6. Karanewsky, D. S.; Bai, X.; Linton, S. D.; Krebs, J. F.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2757.
7. Dolle, R. E.; Prasad, C. V. C.; Prouty, C. P.; Salvino, J. M.;
Awad, M. A.; Schmidt, S. J.; Hoyer, D.; Ross, T. M.; Gray-
bill, T. L.; Speier, G. J.; Uhl, J.; Miller, B. E.; Helaszek, C. T.;
Ator, M. A. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1941.
8. Golec, J. M. C.; Mullican, M. D.; Murcko, M. A.; Wilson,
K. P.; Kay, D. P.; Jones, S. D.; Murdoch, R.; Bemis, G. W.;
Raybuck, S. A.; Luong, Y.-P.; Livingston, D. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 2181.
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) NaHCO3, DMF, 70 ꢀC, 83%;
(ii) 10% Pd/C, H2 (1 atm.); (iii) EDC, DMF, 5–20 ꢀC, 71% for steps
(ii) and (iii); (iv) LHMDS (1.1 equiv), BrCH2CO2CH3, THF, 90%.
9. Semple, G.; Ashworth, D. M.; Baker, G. R.; Batt, A. R.;
Baxter, A. J.; Benzies, D. W. M.; Elliot, L. H.; Evans, D. M.;
Franklin, R. J.; Judson, P.; Jenkins, R. D.; Pitt, G. R.; Roo-
ker, D. P.; Sheppard, A.; Szelke, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Isomura,
Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 1337.
10. Dolle, R. E.; Prouty, C. P.; Prasad, C. V. C.; Cook, E.;
Saha, A.; Ross, M. T.; Salvino, J. M.; Helzak, C. T.; Ator,
M. A. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2438.
11. Mullican, M. D.; Harbeson, S; Lauffer, D. L.; Gillespie,
R. J.; Wilson, K. P.; Murcko, M. A.; Bemis, G.; Raybuck, S.;
Ford, P.; Decker, C.; Ku, G.; Nyce, P.; Robidoux, A.; Wan-
namaker, M. W.; Ledford, B.; Murdoch, R.; Matharu, S.;
Kay, D.; Batchelor, M.; Jones, S. D.; Porritt, J.; Elbaum, D.;
Billen, G.; Mauger, J.; Fox, E.; Sintchak, J.; Coll, J.; Thom-
son, J. T.; Wei, Y.; Margolin, N.; Luong, Y.-P. C.; Namchuk,
M.; Lauffer, L.; Faust, T.; Ager, I. R.; Heiser, A.; Bridson, G.;
Jones, P.; Laitinen, L.; Ruuth, E.; Moos, D.; Kurzel, G. U.;
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (v) HCl (g), EtOAc; (vi) benzoic
acid, HOBT, EDC, 65% for steps (v) and (vi); (vii) 3-phenylpropionyl
chloride, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 83%; (viii) 2 N NaOH, quant; (ix) HOBT,
EDC; (x) (a) 25% TFA, CH2Cl2; (b) MeOH/AcOH/37% aq formal-
dehyde (5:1:1), 20 ꢀC.