JOURNAL OF
POLYMER SCIENCE
ARTICLE
WWW.POLYMERCHEMISTRY.ORG
Anionic Polymerization of MBCG with t-BuONa
mers. Presumably, this may be caused by the ring strain of
carbonate ring connected to a bicyclic structure of glucopy-
ranoside. Using DBU as an initiator, the polymerization rate
in DMF was faster than that in THF. It was supposed that
the zwitterion intermediate 1 was more favorably formed
between MBCG and DBU in DMF than in THF, which was sol-
vated and stabilized by DMF. When the polymerization was
performed with t-BuONa in 1 M solution, the molecular
weight of the polymer decreased as time progressed. MALDI-
TOF MS analysis of the obtained polymer revealed that cyclic
polymers were produced by a backbiting reaction. We expect
that the polycarbonate having glucopyranoside structure syn-
thesized here can be a novel biocompatible or biodegradable
material in the future.
As mentioned above, the polymerization of MBCG with t-
BuONa gave the corresponding polymer in high yield as
shown in Table 2. Then, we examined the effect of initiator
amount on the polymerization in detail under this polymer-
ization condition (Table 3). In all [MBCG]0/[initiator]0 ratios
examined here ranging from 50 to 200, poly(MBCG) could be
obtained in high yield. In particular, the condition of run 3
([MBCG]0/[initiator]0 ¼ 200) gave the polymer in 89% yield,
whose molecular weight was the highest (Mn ¼ 20,200). It is
worth nothing that the Mns were always lower than the Mn
theo. This is presumably because backbiting reaction occurred
during the polymerization. To further examine the polymer-
ization, we checked time-evolved polymerization behavior
using t-BuONa as an initiator. Table 4 shows the results of
the polymerization with t-BuONa at room temperature in
THF. In the case of 1 M solution, MBCG was quantitatively
consumed within 30 s. Thus, the polymerization rate with t-
BuONa was much faster than that with DBU (Table 2, run 6).
The number-averaged molecular weight of the polymer
obtained at 30 s was 16,000. However, the molecular weight
decreased to 6400 when the polymerization time was pro-
longed to 24 h. Hence, the backbiting reaction might occur
from a growing alkoxide chain end to carbonate group in the
same polymer chain. The polymerization smoothly proceeded
even in more diluted solution (0.25 M) to give a polymer in
93% conversion for 30 s. In this case, however, the molecu-
lar weight of the polymer was almost constant as the poly-
merization time evolved. Thus, it was assumed that backbit-
ing reaction tends to take place more frequently in the
concentrated polymerization condition. To check the struc-
tures of the obtained polymers in detail, we carried out
MALDI-TOF MS measurements. Figure 2 shows the MALDI-
TOF MS spectra of the polymers obtained in 1.0 and 0.25 M
solutions. In the spectra of Figure 2(a), two series of signals
(l and ~) were observed. Both series had the same peak
intervals of 308 m/z corresponding to the molecular weight
of the monomer repeating unit. Judging from their signal
positions, these spectra are assigned to be a linear structure
(~) and a cyclic structure (l) formed by backbiting reac-
tion, respectively. The signals of a cyclic structure were
observed even in the polymer obtained in 0.25 M solution
[Fig. 2(b)], though the molecular weight did not decrease.
Thus, in both concentrations, the obtained polymers con-
tained cyclic structure, which were formed by backbiting
reaction. It suggests that the backbiting reaction might be in-
evitable in the polymerization of MBCG under the present
conditions.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1 L. S. Nair, C. T. Laurencin, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32,
762–798.
2 H. Wang, J. H. Dong, K. Y. Qiu, Z. W. Gu, J. Polym. Sci. Part
A: Polym. Chem. 1998, 36, 1301–1307.
3 K. J. Zhu, R. W. Hendren, K. Jensen, C. G. Pitt, Macromole-
cules 1991, 24, 1736–1740.
4 A. C. Albertsson, M. Eklund, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995, 57,
87–103.
5 F. Suriano, R. Pratt, J. P. K. Tan, N. Wiradharma, A. Nelson,
Y. Y. Yang, P. Dubois, J. L. Hedrick, Biomaterials 2010, 31,
2637–2645.
6 W. J. Carothers, F. J. V. Natta, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1930, 52,
314–326.
7 G. Rokicki, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 259–342.
8 K. Soga, S. Hosoda, Y. Tazuke, S. Ikeda, J. Polym. Sci. Part
A: Polym. Chem. 1977, 15, 219–229.
9 L. Vogdanis, B. Martens, H. Uchtmann, F. Hensel, W. Heitz,
Macromol. Chem. 1990, 191, 465–472.
10 T. Takata, H. Matsuoka, T. Endo, Chem. Lett. 1991, 12,
2091–2094.
11 T. Takata, M. Kanamaru, T. Endo, Macromolecules 1996, 29,
2315–2317.
12 J. Matsuo, F. Sanda, T. Endo, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym.
Chem. 1997, 35, 1375–1380.
13 M. Murayama, F. Sanda, T. Endo, Macromolecules 1998, 31,
919–923.
14 J. Matsuo, K. Aoki, F. Sanda, T. Endo, Macromolecules
1998, 31, 4432–4438.
15 J.-C. Lee, M. H. Litt, Macromolecules 2000, 33, 1618–1627.
16 F. Sanda, J. Kamatani, T. Endo, Macromolecules 2001, 34,
1564–1569.
17 O. Haba, H. Tomizuka, T. Endo, Macromolecules 2005, 38,
3562–3563.
SUMMARY
18 A. S. Khomami, T. J. Forcada, C. Wilson, D. A. R.
Sanders, N. R. Thomas, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8,
1596–1602.
We investigated on the anionic ring-opening polymerization
of MBCG in detail under various conditions. The polymeriza-
tions initiated with n-BuLi, t-BuOLi, t-BuONa, t-BuOK, and
DBU smoothly proceeded to give the corresponding poly-
19 W. M. Doane, B. S. Shasha, E. I. Stout, C. R. Russell, C. E.
Rist, Carbohydr. Res. 1967, 4, 445–451.
WWW.MATERIALSVIEWS.COM
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY 2013, 51, 1651–1655
1655