Me
B
to give 8† in 84% yield (Scheme 5). The 1H NMR spectrum of
the reaction mixture displayed a weak singlet at d 6.48,
suggesting the formation of a small quantity (9%) of a
byproduct, which might have come from plain addition of 1 to
the triple bond.
Partial financial support from the Science and Technology
Corporation (JST) through the CREST program is gratefully
acknowledged. We thank Dr T. Sakakura for valuable discus-
sions in the initial stages of the research.
N
N
+
SiMe2Ph
Me
i
SiMe2Ph
Me
SiMe2Ph
Me
N
N
B
B
+
N
N
Me
Footnotes
Me
4
5
* E-mail: mtanaka@ccmail.nimc.go.jp
† Selected spectral and/or physical data for the products 1H NMR (C6D6),
270 MHz; J/Hz) for 2a: bp 135–140 °C at 2.3 3 1023 Torr; dH 0.43 (s, 6 H,
SiCH3), 0.86 [t, J 6.8, 3 H, CH2(CH2)4CH3], 1.14–1.53 [m, 8 H,
CH2(CH2)4CH3], 2.28 [t, J 7.2, 2 H, CH2(CH2)4CH3], 2.51 (s, 6 H, NCH3),
2.89 (s, 4 H, NCH2), 6.36 (s, 1 H, NCH), 7.10–7.33 (m, 3 H, arom),
7.50–7.65 (m, 2 H, arom). For 3: dH 0.40 (s, 6 H, SiCH3), 2.49 (s, 6 H,
NCH3), 2.84 (s, 4 H, NCH2), 6.56 (s, 1 H, NCH), 6.95–7.35 (m, 8 H, arom),
7.50–7.60 (m, 2 H, arom). For 4: bp 128–132 °C at 2.8 3 1023 Torr
(mixture of 4 and 5); dH 0.38 (s, 6 H, SiCH3), 1.46–1.68 (m, 2 H), 2.31–2.41
(m, 4 H), 2.46 (s, 6 H, NCH3), 2.83 (s, 4 H, NCH2), 5.40 (s, 1 H, NCH), 5.62
(s, 1 H, NCH), 7.12–7.31 (m, 3 H, arom), 7.42–7.60 (m, 2 H, arom). For 6:
L = etpo, L/Pd = 2, 2 h, 98% (4:5 = 81:19)
L = etpo, L/Pd = 1, 2 h, 97% (4:5 = 87:13)
L = PMe3,L/Pd = 2, 2 h, 84% (4:5 = 30:70)
L = PPh3, L/Pd = 2, 7 h, 98% (4:5 = 26:74)
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditons: i, Pd2(dba)3 (2.5 mol%), ligand
(L/Pd = 2 or 1), C6D6, 110 °C
A decrease in the quantity of etpo relative to palladium is
envisioned to be favourable to minimize the formation of
byproduct 5 if simultaneous coordination of both acetylenic
bonds to palladium is a prerequisite for the cyclization leading
to 4. Indeed, the reaction of hepta-1,6-diyne with 1 at etpo/Pd
= 1 under otherwise identical conditions resulted in a slight
increase in the selectivity for 4; the 4:5 ratio was 87:13,
obtained in a 97% combined yield. The reaction of octa-
1,7-diyne with 1 was slightly less reactive and much less
selective for the cyclization product 6,† with 7 as the major
product (Scheme 4). The selectivity was not appreciably
improved even when etpo/Pd = 1, indicating the necessity for
a new design of catalyst to circumvent the difficulty of
coordination of both acetylenic bonds.
dH 0.40 and 0.43 (both s, 6 H, SiCH3), 1.45–1.73 (m, 4 H), 2.20–2.40 (m,
4 H), 2.55 (s, 6 H, NCH3), 2.83–2.97 (m, 4 H, NCH2), 5.30 (s, 1 H, NCH),
5.47 (s, 1 H, NCH), 7.05–7.26 (m, 3 H, arom), 7.54–7.63 (m, 2 H, arom). For
8: dH 0.24 (s, 3 H, SiCH3), 0.26 (s, 3 H, SiCH3), 0.82 (dd, J 11.9 and 14.6,
1 H, SiCH2), 0.90 (t, J 7.1, 3 H, OCH2CH3), 0.91 (t, J 7.1, 3 H, OCH2CH3),
1.32 (dd, J 2.0 and 14.6, 1 H, SiCH2), 1.80–1.93 (m, 1 H, CH2), 2.50 (s, 6
H, NCH3), 2.74–3.07 (m, 7 H, NCH2, CH2 and CH), 3.14 (d, J 17.5, 1 H,
CH2), 3.32 (d, J 17.5, 1 H, CH2), 3.85–4.03 (m, 4 H, OCH2CH3), 5.43 (s, 1
H, NCBH), 7.13–7.27 (m, 3 H, arom), 7.45–7.53 (m, 2 H, arom).
References
1 For reviews, see Organometallic Reagents in Organic Synthesis, ed. J. H.
Bateson and M. B. Mitchell, Academic Press, New York, 1994, pp. 129–
160; H. K. Sharma and K. H. Pannell, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 1351.
2 T. Ishiyama, N. Matsuda, N. Miyaura and A. Suzuki, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1993, 115, 11018; R. T. Baker, P. Nguyen, T. B. Marder and
S. A. Westcott, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1336;
T. Ishiyama, N. Matsuda, M. Murata, F. Ozawa, A. Suzuki and
N. Miyaura, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 713; G. Lesley, P. Nguyen,
N. J. Taylor, T. B. Marder, A. J. Scott, W. Clegg and N. C. Norman,
Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5137; C. N. Iverson and M. R. Smith, III,
Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5155.
Finally an enyne compound, 4,4-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)hept-
6-en-1-yne, also smoothly underwent similar cyclization with 1
Me
N
+
B
SiMe2Ph
N
Me
i
3 T. Ishiyama, K.-i. Nishijima, N. Miyaura and A. Suzuki, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1993, 115, 7219; L.-B. Han, N. Choi and M. Tanaka, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1996, 118, 7000.
4 S.-y. Onozawa, Y. Hatanaka, T. Sakakura, S. Shimada and M. Tanaka,
Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5450.
5 (a) S.-y. Onozawa, Y. Hatanaka, T. Sakakura and M. Tanaka, presented
at the 43rd Symposium on Organometallic Chemistry, Abstract PB231,
Osaka, October 31–November 1st, 1996; (b) S.-y. Onozawa, Y.
Hatanaka, T. Sakakura and M. Tanaka, presented at the 72nd Spring
Annual Meeting of the Chemical Society of Japan, Abstract 3F146,
Tokyo, March 27–30th, 1997.
6 J. D. Buynak and B. Geng, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 3112.
7 M. Suginome, H. Nakamura, T. Matsuda and Y. Ito, presented at the 72nd
Spring Annual Meeting of the Chemical Society of Japan, Abstract
2F226, Tokyo, March 27–30th, 1997.
Me
SiMe2Ph
Me
B
SiMe2Ph
B
N
N
+
N
N
Me
Me
6 17%
7 62%
Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: i, Pd2(dba)3 (2.5 mol%), etpo (etpo/
Pd = 2), C6D6, 110 °C, 2 h
Me
EtO2C CO2Et
N
+
B
SiMe2Ph
N
Me
i
8 T. Hayashi, A. M. Kawamoto, T.-a. Kobayashi and M. Tanaka, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1990, 563.
SiMe2Ph
Me
EtO2C
EtO2C
9 (a) H. Yamashita, M. Catellani and M. Tanaka, Chem. Lett., 1991, 241;
(b) H. Yamashita and M. Tanaka, Chem. Lett., 1992, 1547; (c)
T. Hayashi, H. Yamashita, T. Sakakura, Y. Uchimaru and M. Tanaka,
Chem. Lett., 1991, 245; (d) H. Yamashita, N. P. Reddy and M. Tanaka,
Macromolecules, 1993, 26, 2143.
N
B
N
Me
8 84%
Received in Cambridge, UK, 24th April 1997; Com.
7/02802D
Scheme 5 Reagents and conditions: i, Pd2(dba)3 (2.5 mol%), etpo (etpo/
Pd = 2), C6D6, 110 °C, 2 h
1230
Chem. Commun., 1997