J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11567-11575
11567
Glycosylation of Threonine of the Repeating Unit of RNA
Polymerase II with â-Linked N-Acetylglucosame Leads to a Turnlike
Structure
Eric E. Simanek,† Dee-Hua Huang,† Laura Pasternack,† Timothy D. Machajewski,†
Oliver Seitz,† David S. Millar,‡ H. Jane Dyson,‡ and Chi-Huey Wong*,†
Contribution from the Departments of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute,
10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037
ReceiVed July 2, 1998
Abstract: Two models of the repeating C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (Ac-SYSPTSPSYS-NH2;
Ac-SYSPT(â-O-GlcNAc)SPSYS-NH2) were prepared and their conformations in water studied using 1-D
1
and 2-D H NMR spectroscopies, CD spectrophotometry, fluorescence anisotropy, and molecular mechanics
and dynamics calculations. The data suggest that glycosylation of the native, randomly coiled peptide with a
single, biologically relevant sugar leads to the formation of a turn. This report represents the first structural
study of a new class of glycoproteins monoglycosylated with N-acetylglucosamine on threonine.
Introduction
by many groups: examples have been reported where glyco-
sylation leads to differences in structure between native and
glycosylated sequences.13-15 Herein we report that glycosyla-
tion with a single â-linked GlcNAc on the threonine residue of
a model of the polymeric domain of RNA polymerase II, 1,
The polymeric C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest
subunit of the holoenzyme responsible for the synthesis of
mRNA, RNA polymerase II, consists of a highly conserved
repeating sequence, (YSPTSPS)n.1,2 The length of the sequence
varies with the evolutionary complexity of the organism;
mammals have 52 repeats,3,4 Drosophila have 45 repeats,4,5
yeasts have 27 repeats,6,7 and plasmodia have 18 repeats.8 While
it is generally agreed that hyperphosphorylation of the CTD
converts the polymerase from an inactive, promoter-bound state
to an actively transcribing assembly,9 the pattern of phospho-
rylation remains uncertain.10,11 Recently, Hart and colleagues
recognized that the CTD is also glycosylated with a single,
â-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) on threonine.12 While
the role that glycosylation plays is unclear, the modification of
the CTD through glycosylation or phosphorylation is mutually
exclusive.
Ac-Ser-Tyr-Ser-Pro-Thr(â-O-GlcNAc)-
Ser-Pro-Ser-Tyr-Ser-NH2
1
Ac-Ser-Tyr-Ser-Pro-Thr-Ser-Pro-Ser-Tyr-Ser-NH2
2
leads to increased structure over the corresponding sugar-free
peptide. We find evidence for a nonrandom, turnlike structure
about the site of glycosylation for 1 and random coil structure
for 2. The evidence for the turnlike structure comes primarily
from 1H NMR: nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) connectivities,
variable temperature coefficients of the amide protons, chemical
shift differences of amide and HR protons of 1 and 2, and the
The search for general principles that describe the role of
glycosylation in peptides13-15 and proteins16 is being pursued
† Department of Chemistry.
1
rates of H/2H exchange are all consistent with a turn. CD
‡ Department of Molecular Biology.
spectrophotometry and fluorescence anisotropy measurements
corroborate this conclusion. Computation using NMR-derived
constraints produces a model with turnlike structure about the
site of glycosylation.
Model System. Molecules 1 and 2 contain the heptad repeat
unit and additional amino acids appended to the N- and
C-termini. Our choice to include these residues is based on
previous studies of models of the native peptide (similar to 2)
by Suzuki,17 Harding,18 and Corden.19
On the basis of data from sedimentation and fluorescence
quenching studies, Suzuki concluded that the uncapped se-
quence, YSPTSPSY, bound to DNA. Noting the similarity of
the sequence to the known bisintercalator, Triostin A, Suzuki
(1) Corden, J. L. TIBS 1990, 15, 383-387.
(2) Woychik, N. A.; Young, R. A. TIBS 1990, 347-351.
(3) Corden, J. L.; Cadena, D. L.; Ahearn, J. M., Jr.; Dahmus, M. E. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985, 82, 7934-7938.
(4) Allison, L. A.; Wong, J. K.-C.; Fitzpatrick, V. D.; Moyle, M.; Ingles,
C. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1988, 8, 321-329.
(5) Zehring, W. A.; Lee, J. M.; Weeks, J. R.; Jokerst, R. S.; Greenleaf,
A. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85, 3698-3702.
(6) Allison, L. A.; Moyle, M.; Shales, M.; Ingles, C. J. Cell 1985, 42,
599-610.
(7) Nonet, M.; Sweetser, D.; Young, R. A. Cell 1987, 50, 909-915.
(8) Li, W. B.; Bzik, D. J.; Gu, H.; Tanaka, M.; Fox, B. A.; Inselburg, J.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 9621-9636.
(9) Dahmus, M. E. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1261, 171-182.
(10) Baskaran, R.; Dahmus, M. E.; Wang, J. Y. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1993, 90, 11167-11171.
(11) Zhang, J.; Corden, J. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 2290-2296.
(12) Kelly, W. G.; Dahmus, M. E.; Hart, G. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1993,
268, 10416-10424.
(15) Andreotti, A. H.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3352.
(16) Varki, A. Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97.
(17) Suzuki, M. Nature 1990, 344, 562-565.
(18) Harding, M. M. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 4658-4664.
(19) Cagas, P. M.; Corden, J. L. Proteins 1995, 149.
(13) Blanco, F. J.; Jimenez, M. A.; Herranz, J.; Rico, M.; Santoro, J.;
Nieto, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5887.
(14) O’Connor, S. E.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2295.
10.1021/ja982312w CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/03/1998