In the present study no cases of atrophy, perforation,
or cholesteatoma were seen in the rat pars tensa in pro-
longed otitis media with effusion. This finding is in agree-
ment with previous reports by Stenfors et al.19 and Kui-
jpers and Vennix.20 In contrast, however, atrophy and
retraction were seen in the pars flaccida as previously
described.13 Several possibilities exist as to why the pars
tensa of the rat does not develop atrophy with prolonged
otitis media with effusion. There are differences between
humans and rats in the ultrastructure and composition of
the fibers in the lamina propria.21 This may predispose to
atrophy and/or retraction pocket formation in the human,
particularly in the posterior part of the pars tensa where
the circular fibrous layer is more delicate and less obvi-
ous.22 The rat pars tensa being relatively smaller may be
less susceptible to negative pressure and strain than the
human tensa. In addition, the rat pars tensa appears to
depend on the process of diffusion for its nutrition,23 un-
like the human pars tensa, which has a rich blood supply.
It is conceivable, therefore, that any disruption of the
blood supply could lead to atrophy. The most susceptible
regions of the tympanic membrane to atrophy, therefore,
would be those that are most vascularized, i.e., the pars
flaccida and the posterosuperior part of the pars tensa.22
Alternatively, it may be that longer periods of persistent
otitis media with effusion in the rat are needed for atrophy
and/or atelectasis to develop.
The human pars tensa appears to respond to pro-
longed otitis media with the development of tympanoscle-
rosis, atrophy, or both. Atrophy can then progress to per-
foration, atelectasis, and/or cholesteatoma. The reason
why one human tympanic membrane will respond with
the development of tympanosclerosis and another with the
development of atrophy, and yet another with both tym-
panosclerosis and atrophy, is still unclear. The fact that
atrophy was not seen in the rat pars tensa suggests that
this animal model may not be suitable to study posterior
retraction pockets or mesotympanic cholesteatoma. It
would appear, however, to be an excellent model for the
study of tympanosclerosis in the pars tensa and retraction
and atrophy in the pars flaccida.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Teele DW, Klein JO, Rosner BA. Epidemiology of otitis media
in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89(Suppl 68):
5–6.
2. Tos M, Poulsen G. Changes of the pars tensa in secretory
otitis. Otorhinolaryngology 1979;41:313–328.
3. Maw RA. Glue Ear in Childhood. London: Mac Keith Press,
1995:103–117.
4. Gibb AG. Tympanosclerosis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
1976;69:155–162.
5. Igarashi M, Konishi S, Alford BR, Guilford FR. The pathology
of tympanosclerosis. Laryngoscope 1970;80:233–243.
6. Sheehy JL, House WF. Tympanosclerosis. J Laryngol Otol
1962;76:151–157.
7. Zollner F. Tympanosclerosis. J Laryngol Otol 1956;70:77–85.
8. Chang IW. Tympanosclerosis: electron microscopic study.
Acta Otolaryngol 1969;68:62–72.
9. Kuijpers W, Wielinga E, Tonnaer E, Jap HK. Experimentally
induced tympanosclerosis. In: Lim DJ, Bluestone CD,
Klein JO, Nelson JD, eds. Recent Advances in Otitis Media.
Toronto: Decker Periodicals, 1988:468–471.
10. Lesser THJ, Williams KR, Skinner DW. Tympanosclerosis,
grommets and shear stresses. Clin Otolaryngol 1988;13:
375–380.
11. Helstrom S, Goldie P, Magnuson K, Fau C. Oxygen level
influences the middle ear tissue reaction in ears with per-
forated tympanic membranes. In: Lim DJ, ed. Recent Ad-
vances in Otitis Media. Philadelphia: B.C. Decker, 1993:
334–335.
12. Wielinga EWJ, Kuijpers W, Tonnaer E, Jap PHK. An exper-
imental model for tympanosclerosis: a preliminary report.
Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1988;105:537–542.
13. Russell J, Giles SJ. Persistent otitis media with effusion: a
new experimental model. Laryngoscope 1998;108:
1181–1184.
14. Lim DJ. Tympanic membrane. Acta Otolaryngol 1968;66:
181–198.
15. Friedmann I, Hodges GM, Graham M. Tympanosclerosis: an
electron microscopic study of matrix vesicles. Ann Otol
Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89(Suppl 68):241–245.
16. Moller P. Tympanosclerosis of the ear-drum in secretory oti-
tis media. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1984;Suppl 414:
171–177.
17. Wielinga EWJ, Kuijpers W. The influence of re-aeration of
the middle ear on tympanosclerotic lesions in otitis media
with effusion. In: Tos M, Thomsen J, Balle V, eds. Otitis
Media Today. The Hague: Kugler Publications, 1997:
629–630.
18. McMinn RMH. Electron microscopic observations on the re-
pair of perforated tympanic membranes in the guinea-pig.
J Anat 1975;120:207–217.
19. Stenfors LE, Carlsoo B, Winbald B. Structure and healing
capacity of the rat tympanic membrane after eustachian
tube occlusion. Acta Otolaryngol 1981;91:75–84.
20. Kuijpers W, Vennix PPCA. Origin and fate of spontaneous
tympanic membrane perforations. In: Lim DJ, Bluestone
CD, Klein JO, Nelson JD, Ogra PL, eds. Recent Advances in
Otitis Media. Toronto: Decker Periodicals, 1993:453–455.
21. McMinn RMH, Taylor AM. Ultrastructure of fibrils in devel-
oping human and guinea-pig tympanic membrane. J Anat
1978;125:107–115.
22. Ars B. Tympanic membrane retraction pocket. Acta Otorhi-
nolaryngol Belg 1995;49:163–171.
23. Albin N, Hellstrom S, Salen B, Stenfors LE, Wirell S. The
vascular supply of the rat tympanic membrane. Anat Rec
1985;212:17–22.
CONCLUSION
Tympanosclerosis in the rat pars tensa is a progres-
sive disorder. It begins in the inner submucosal connective
tissue layer and spreads over time to involve the lamina
propria. The extent of calcium deposition and fibrosis
across the sublayers of the rat pars tensa appears closely
related to the duration of the effusion. This rat model for
prolonged otitis media with effusion is therefore a suitable
animal model for the study of tympanosclerosis in the pars
tensa.
Laryngoscope 112: September 2002
1666
Russell and Giles: Tympanosclerosis in the Rat Tympanic Membrane