CHIRALITY 26:356–360 (2014)
Selective Bromocyclization of 2-Geranylphenols Promoted by
Phosphite–Urea Cooperative Catalysts
4
1,3
YASUHIRO SAWAMURA,1 HIDEFUMI NAKATSUJI,1 MATSUJIRO AKAKURA,2,3 AKIRA SAKAKURA, AND KAZUAKI ISHIHARA
*
*
1Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, Japan
2Department of Chemistry, Aichi University of Education, Igaya-cho, Kariya, Aichi, Japan
3JST-CREST, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, Japan
4Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan
ABSTRACT
Nucleophilic phosphite–urea cooperative catalysts are highly efficient for the
bromonium-induced cyclization of 2-geranylphenols. Phosphite–N,N’-dimethylurea catalysts also
show moderate activity, probably due to the steric effect of their bent conformation. Chirality
26:356–360, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
KEY WORDS: bromocyclization; bromophosphonium salt; N,N’-dimethylurea; 2-geranylphenol;
phosphite; steric effect; urea
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The biosynthesis of bromine-containing polycyclic
terpenoids appears to include the regio- and enantioselective
bromination of a carbon–carbon double bond followed by
We first examined the catalytic activities of nucleophilic phos-
phites 1 and 2 for the bromocyclization of 4-homogeranyltoluene
(3). The reaction of 3 was conducted with NBS (1.1 equiv) in
the presence of 1 or 2 (30 mol%) in toluene at À40°C for 6 h
(Table 1). As we described in the previous report, the reaction
diastereoselectively gave the desired trans-fused AB-ring prod-
uct 4 together with endo- and exo-isomeric A-ring products 5
and undesired dibromide 6. Dibromide 6 was generated via de-
composition of the bromophosphonium active species.23 The
ratio of 4, endo-5 and exo-5 in each reaction was ca. 1:1:1, and
the crude products did not include the cis-fused isomer of 4
or the tetrasubstituted isomer of 5. Since A-ring products 5
could be quantitatively converted to AB-ring product 4 by treat-
ment with SnCl4 and trifluoroacetic acid, the combined yield of
diastereoselective
π–cation
cyclization.1–3
Biomimetic
bromonium-induced polyene cyclizations (π–cation cyclization)
should be powerful tools for the construction of complex poly-
cyclic structures of these bromine-containing natural products.
Hence, much attention has been devoted to the development of
biomimetic bromonium-induced polyene cyclizations. How-
ever, conventional methods that use a standard electrophilic
brominating reagent such as Br2, N-bromosuccinimide (NBS)
or 2,4,4,6-tetrabromocyclohexa-2,5-dienone (TABCO) are
generally less reactive and generate significant amounts of
byproducts.4–15 Only a few efficient methods have been
developed thus far for bromonium-induced polyene cycliza-
tions.16–20 In 2009, Snyder and colleagues reported that
Et2SBr•SbCl5Br (BDSB) is a highly reactive electrophilic bro-
mination reagent and gives the bromocyclization products in
good to high yields.21,22
We recently reported nucleophilic phosphite–urea coopera-
tive catalysts 1b and 2b (Scheme 1), which had high turnover
rates for the highly selective bromocyclization of
homogeranylarenes.23–28 Only 0.5 mol% of 2b successfully
catalyzes the bromocyclization of 4-homogeranyltoluene
(3) to give the corresponding bromocyclization product in
94% yield (Scheme 1). The nucleophilic phosphite group
catalytically activates a brominating reagent such as NBS
and 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin (DBH) to generate
the corresponding bromophosphonium ion as an active
species. The urea group probably interacts with the succinimide
anion via hydrogen bonding to inhibit decomposition of the cata-
lyst and the generation of byproducts. In the same report, we de-
scribed that phosphite–N,N’-dimethylurea catalyst 1c showed
unexpectedly good activity for the bromocyclization of 3 (84%
yield), although 1c did not have any acidic protons to interact
with the succinimide anion. Since we were interested in the abil-
ity of the N,N’-dimethylurea group to promote bromocyclization,
we reinvestigated the catalytic activity of nucleophilic phosphite
catalysts 1 and 2 for the bromocyclization of 3 in detail. We re-
port here the results of our reinvestigation of the catalytic activity
of phosphite–urea catalysts and an investigation of the
bromocyclization of 2-geranylphenols.
1
4 and 5 was evaluated by H nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) analysis of the crude products. As a result of the
reexamination, phosphite–urea catalysts 1b and 2b gave the
best results: the desired products 4 and 5 were obtained in
almost quantitative yields and the generation of dibromide 6
was successfully suppressed (entries 3 and 4), as we noted in
the previous report. On the other hand, the reaction did not
proceed without a catalyst.
However, the use of phosphite–N,N’-dimethylurea catalyst
1c gave 4 and 5 in only 43% yield (entry 5), although our
previous report23 stated that 1c showed unexpectedly good
activity (4 + 5: 84% yield). The rather high activity of 1c in
our previous report might have been due to some impurities
(acidic materials such as 4-CF3C6H4OH) in the sample of
1c. The data in entry 4 were reproducible, and the purity of
1
1c was >99% based by H NMR analysis. Sterically bulky
phosphite–N,N’-dimethylurea catalyst 2c showed slightly
higher activity than 1a and 1c (53% yield, entry 6). However,
the activity of 2c was almost the same as that of 2a (52%,
entry 2). These results suggested that the N,N’-dimethylurea
*Correspondence to: K. Ishihara, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya
University, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan. E-mail: ishihara@cc.
nagoya-u.ac.jp or A. Sakakura, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technol-
ogy, Okayama University, Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama 700–8530, Japan.
E-mail: sakakura@okayama-u.ac.jp
Received for publication 31 October 2013; Accepted 11 December 2013
DOI: 10.1002/chir.22297
Published online 7 February 2014 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com).
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.