4490 Organometallics, Vol. 19, No. 22, 2000
Nishida et al.
Sch em e 1
Sch em e 2
species are normally rather slower than those of CH3I.12
These results suggest the importance of the triple bond
coordination to Pt(0) prior to or during the oxidative
addition.
98%.13 This reaction yielded cis-Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)(X)-
(PPh3)2 in a 1:1.2 ratio for X ) Cl vs X ) Br, suggesting
that the rate-determining step of the reaction does not
involve a carbon-halogen bond cleavage.
It is important to note that the k3 value for the
In contrast to the straightforward course of the
reaction from Pt(PPh3)2 shown in Scheme 1, it is not
certain at the moment how the proposed initial oxidative
addition product [Pt(η3-CH2CCPh)(PPh3)3]Cl from Pt-
(PPh3)3 is converted to the observable kinetic product,
cis-Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)(Cl)(PPh3)2. The cationic 18-elec-
tron η3-propargyl complex might undergo either dis-
sociation of one PPh3 to give [Pt(η3-CH2CCPh)(PPh3)2]Cl
or η3 to η1 conversion, which gives [Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)-
(PPh3)3]Cl. In fact, a separate treatment of [Pt(η3-CH2-
CCPh)(PPh3)2]OTf with 1 equiv of PPh3 resulted in the
observation of NMR resonances attributable to the
complex [Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)(PPh3)3](OTf) together with
additional minor resonances possibly due to cis-
reaction of PhCtCCH2Cl was similar to the rate of
10b
coordination of PhCtCCH3 to Pt(PPh3)2
(Table 2).
This result suggests that the rate-determining step of
the oxidative addition of PhCtCCH2Cl to Pt(PPh3)2 is
the coordination of the triple bond. To gain further
support for this notion, the competition between PhCt
CCH2Cl and PhCtCCH2Br in the reaction with Pt-
(C2H4)(PPh3)2 was attempted in toluene-d8 at room
temperature. The concentrations of the two halides were
set equal to each other and were in excess relative to
the Pt(0) complex. The yields of products, cis-Pt(η1-
CH2CtCPh)(X)(PPh3)2, obtained from a mixture of the
two substrates were similar (1:1.5) for the chloride vs
bromide. If the rate-determining step of the oxidative
addition involved the C-halogen bond cleavage, the
reactivity of the bromide would have been considerably
greater than that of the chloride.
The rate-determining formation of Pt(η2-PhCtCCH2-
Cl)(PPh3)2 from Pt(PPh3)2 and PhCtCCH2Cl would be
followed by rapid collapse of this complex to the ion pair
[Pt(η3-CH2CCPh)(PPh3)2]Cl, which necessarily keeps
two PPh3 groups cis to each other (Scheme 1). It was
also confirmed that the separately isolated cationic
complex [Pt(η3-CH2CCPh)(PPh3)2](OTf) reacts readily
with Cl- to give cis-Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)(Cl)(PPh3)2, as
also reported3 in the corresponding reaction with Br-.
With regard to the reaction of Pt(PPh3)3, it is remark-
able that the rate constant k1 for the reaction with
PhCtCCH2Cl is 40 times larger than that with PhCt
CCH3 (Table 2). In the latter case, it is possible that
the triple bond coordination to form an intermediate of
the type Pt(η2-PhCtCCH3)(PPh3)3 is not a rate-deter-
mining step. This intermediate, if formed as a discrete
species, might have to overcome a subsequent higher
barrier process, namely dissociation of PPh3. On the
other hand, in the case of the reaction of PhCtCCH2Cl
the CtC coordination complex Pt(η2-PhCtCCH2Cl)-
(PPh3)3 formed first could undergo very facile ionization
of the C-Cl bond to afford [Pt(η3-CH2CCPh)(PPh3)3]Cl
(Scheme 2). In a search for further support, the com-
petitive experiment was carried out by employing an
equimolar mixture of PhCtCCH2Cl and PhCtCCH2-
Br which are in excess relative to Pt(PPh3)4 in the
presence of a high concentration of PPh3 (1.66 × 10-1
mol/L), where the contribution of Pt(PPh3)3 species to
the overall oxidative addition is expected to exceed
{(PPh3)2Pt[CH2C(PPh3)CPh]}(OTf).14 When further
treated with Cl-, the mixture was completely converted
to cis-Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)(Cl)(PPh3)2. It is likely that the
cationic η1-propargyl intermediate [Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)-
(PPh3)3]Cl is formed before the observable cis product.15
Con clu sion s
The oxidative addition reaction of propargyl halides
to Pt(PPh3)4 proceeded via the two active species Pt-
(PPh3)2 and Pt(PPh3)3. The rate-determining step of the
reaction of Pt(PPh3)2 is the coordination of the triple
bond of PhCtCCH2X, which is followed by rapid col-
lapse of Pt(η2-PhCtCCH2X)(PPh3)2 to [Pt(η3-CH2CCPh)-
(PPh3)2]Cl and finally to cis-Pt(η1-CH2CtCPh)(Cl)-
(PPh3)2. The rate-determining step of the reaction of
Pt(PPh3)3 would also involve the coordination of the
triple bond to form Pt(η2-PhCtCCH2X)(PPh3)3, which
then undergoes C-Cl bond cleavage without dissocia-
tion of PPh3 ligand. These reaction profiles must be also
essential in the oxidative addition of allylic electrophiles
with zerovalent group 10 metal complexes.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Con sid er a tion s. All manipulations were con-
ducted under a nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk
1
or drybox techniques. H and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) spectra were recorded on a J EOL GSX-270 spectrom-
eter. Kinetic measurements were carried out by using a
(13) The second term of eq 2 amounts to ca. 4.64 × 10-2
.
(14) Cheng, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-K.; Huang, T.-M.; Yu, C.-I.; Lee, G.-H.;
Wang, Y.; Chen, J .-T. Organometallics 1998, 17, 2953.
(15) A similar cationic complex, [Pt(CH3)(PPh3)3]BF4, was converted
to the cis product cis-Pt(CH3)(Cl)(PPh3)2 when treated with Cl-, while
trans-Pt(CH3)(I)(PPh3)2 was the only observable product when [Pt-
(CH3)(PPh3)3]BF4 was treated with I-.16
(12) (a) Vernon, C. A. J . Chem. Soc. 1954, 4462. (b) de la More, P.
B. D. J . Chem. Soc. 1955, 3169. (c) Hughes, E. D.; Ingold. C. K.; Mackie,
J . D. H. J . Chem. Soc. 1955, 3177.
(16) Unpublished results.