ChemComm
Communication
of synthesis of 3 when 2 was present in equimolar or in 2.5-fold molar
excess over 1. Up to two-thirds of 1 were utilised for glucosylation of
(R)-2 while the remainder substrate was lost to hydrolysis. Product 3
was obtained in a maximum concentration of 240 mM. Quantitative
utilisation of the initial (R)-2 present was possible (ESI,† Fig. S4,
panel C). Glucosylation of glucose occurred to a minor extent under
these conditions (o5%). Production of 3 was lowered substantially
(r140 mM) upon decreasing the concentration of 2 to 400 mM, now
equaling the applied concentration of 1 (ESI,† Fig. S4, panel B), or
when using 1 (1000 mM) in excess over 2 (400 mM). Use of 2 in excess
over 1 is therefore supported. Procedures for efficient preparative
work-up of reaction mixtures from sucrose phosphorylase-catalysed
transglycosylations have previously been developed.5,14
Fig. 2 Best-fit docking poses for binding of (R)-2 (A) and (S)-2 (B) to the
covalent intermediate of sucrose phosphorylase having a b-glucosyl
residue linked to Asp-192 (PDB-entry 2gdv, molecule A).
Summarising, single-step diastereoselective glucosylation of 2
provides convenient access to the new biomimetic glycoside 3
through chiral synthesis. The same reaction is exploitable through
chiral resolution to obtain (S)-2 (ESI,† Fig. S4, panel C). Chiral
1,2-diols are important target molecules in organic chemistry, and
their preparation through chiral resolution is therefore of consider-
able interest.18 Relying on the selectivity of enzymes, biocatalytic
glycosylation might present an alternative to reported two-step
esterification processes catalysed by lipases/esterases.19
We acknowledge financial support from the Austrian Science
Fund FWF (project L586-B03); V. N. Belov (Max Planck Institute for
Biophysical Chemistry, Goettingen, Germany) for synthesis of 2;
S. Felsinger (Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Vienna,
Fig. 3 Diastereoselectivity of sucrose phosphorylase in the glucosylation
of 1,2-diols correlated with the ratio of reactive atom distances (C1ꢁ ꢁ ꢁO2)
in (S)- and (R)-acceptor poses from molecular docking.
previously shown to be glucosylated by the enzyme with useful Austria) for recording several NMR spectra; and C. Araman and
stereoselectivity, resulting in 2-O-a-D-glucosidic products of high N. K. Chu (Institute of Biological Chemistry, University of Vienna,
diastereomeric purity.8,14 Molecular docking of (R)- and (S)-forms of Austria) for help in recording CD spectra.
glyceric acid and 3-methoxy-1,2-propanediol to sucrose phosphorylase
underpins the observed preference for reaction with one enantiomer of
the acceptor, suggesting this to be the (R)-form in each case (ESI,†
Fig. S3). In search of an interpretable structural parameter of enzyme
stereoselectivity in reactions with different acceptors, we compared
Notes and references
1 P. Bojarova, R. R. Rosencrantz, L. Elling and V. Kren, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2013, 42, 4774–4797.
2 T. Desmet, W. Soetaert, P. Bojarova, V. Kren, L. Dijkhuizen,
reactive atom distances (glucosyl carbon and acceptor oxygen; C1ꢁꢁꢁO2)
in the respective (R)- and (S)-acceptor poses. The C1ꢁꢁꢁO2 distance in
the (S)-acceptor pose was highly variable across the different acceptors
used (ESI,† Fig. S3), while the corresponding C1ꢁꢁꢁO2 distance in the
(R)-acceptor pose was constant at about 3.0 Å. The ratio of the C1ꢁꢁꢁO2
distance in the (S)- and (R)-acceptor pose appears to correlate with the
observed diastereoselectivity of the enzyme, as shown in Fig. 3. The
docking data suggest that Gln-345 might be generally important for
chiral recognition by the enzyme.15,16 Use of sucrose phosphorylase in
chiral synthesis and chiral resolution strategies for diol-containing
acceptor substrates is therefore supported, and this presents a
new type of application for enzymatic transglycosylations. Protein
V. Eastwick-Field and A. Schiller, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 10786–10801.
3 J. Kadokawa, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 4308–4345.
4 C. A. Weijers, M. C. Franssen and G. M. Visser, Biotechnol. Adv.,
2008, 26, 436–456.
5 C. Goedl, T. Sawangwan, M. Mueller, A. Schwarz and B. Nidetzky,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 10086–10089.
6 C. Luley-Goedl, T. Sawangwan, L. Brecker, P. Wildberger and
B. Nidetzky, Carbohydr. Res., 2010, 345, 1736–1740.
7 F. van Rantwijk, M. W. V. Oosterom and R. A. Sheldon, J. Mol. Catal.
B: Enzym., 1999, 6, 511–532.
8 R. Renirie, A. Pukin, B. van Lagen and M. C. R. Franssen, J. Mol.
Catal. B: Enzym., 2010, 67, 219–224.
9 G. Lentzen and T. Schwarz, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2006, 72,
623–634 (and references therein).
10 O. Mirza, L. K. Skov, D. Sprogøe, L. A. van den Broek, G. Beldman,
J. S. Kastrup and M. Gajhede, J. Biol. Chem., 2006, 281, 35576–35584.
engineering that has been employed widely for selectivity enhancement 11 P. F. Frankland, F. M. Whartin and H. Aston, J. Chem. Soc., 1901, 79, 266–274.
12 W. Gaffield, Chem. Ind., 1964, 1460–1461.
13 E. Iizuka and J. T. Yang, Biochemistry, 1964, 3, 1519–1524.
14 T. Sawangwan, C. Goedl and B. Nidetzky, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009,
in esterases and lipases should be useful to improve existing (not highly
selective) transglycosylation catalysts.17
We examined synthesis of 3 as a biomimetic analogue of 4.
Reaction optimisation involved mitigation of hydrolysis of 1 at high
concentrations of 2 (ESI,† Fig. S4). The glucose released by hydrolysis
7, 4267–4270.
15 C. Luley-Goedl and B. Nidetzky, Carbohydr. Res., 2010, 1492–1496.
16 T. Verhaeghe, M. Diricks, D. Aerts, W. Soetaert and T. Desmet,
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2013, 96, 81–88.
causes product inhibition and interferes with the reaction by serving 17 U. T. Bornscheuer, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2002, 13, 543–547.
as a glucosyl acceptor substrate.6 However, non-productive bind-
ing of (S)-2 can also result in inhibition of the enzyme when high
18 Y. Zhao, A. W. Mitra, A. H. Hoveyda and M. L. Snapper, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8471–8474.
19 F. Theil, J. Weidner, S. Ballschuh, A. Kunath and H. Schick, J. Org.
levels of racemic 2 are used. Fig. S4 in ESI† shows full time course
438 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 436--438
Chem., 1994, 59, 388–393.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014