Photochromic copolymers with chromenes
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 60, No. 7, July, 2011
1475
fate, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. A benzene—ethyl aceꢀ
tate (2 : 1) (10 mL) mixture was added to the product obtained,
which was stirred and filtered. The filtrate was subjected to chroꢀ
matography on silica gel eluting with the benzene—ethyl acetate
(2 : 1) mixture. The yield was 0.21 g (29%), light red oil.
1H NMR, δ: 1.91 (s, 3 H, Me); 4.28 (d, 2 H, CH2); 5.47 (s, 1 H,
7´ꢀCH2); 5.81 (s, 1 H, 7´ꢀCH2); 6.59 (d, 1 H, 2ꢀH); 6.86 (m, 4 H,
Ar); 7.40 (m, 5 H, Ar); 7.50 (m, 2 H, Ar); 7.59 (s, 1 H, Ar); 7.81
(d, 1 H, 6ꢀH); 8.09 (d, 1 H, 1ꢀH); 8.63 (t, 1 H, NH).
with an UFSꢀ2 light filter, which transmitted the UV irradiaꢀ
tion in the region 280—380 nm. The intensity of photolyzing
irradiation was 2.4•10–4 Einstein s–1, the measurements were
performed by chemical actinometer based on potassium ferriꢀ
oxalate.
Efficiency of photocoloration (degree of photocoloration) of
photochromic systems was evaluated based on the value of the
photoinduced optical density in the absorption band maximum
of the photoinduced merocyanine form B in the state of photoꢀ
equilibrium, normalized on the value of optical density in the
absorption band maximum of the starting spiropyran form A
(ΔDBPhot/DA). This parameter totalizes effects of all the photo
and thermal transformations of photochromic molecules in the
state of photoequilibrium (ΔDBPhot) with allowance for the abꢀ
sorption of light by the photochromic systems with different conꢀ
centration of photochromic molecules in the layer (DA) and alꢀ
lows us to evaluate the real efficiency of photocoloration of
photochromic systems as a whole. To exclude significant errors
in the evaluation of the photocoloration efficiency, the comparꢀ
ative spectroscopic kinetic studies were performed under the
same experimental conditions.
5ꢀ(NꢀMethacryloylaminoacetoxy)ꢀ3,3ꢀdi(4ꢀmethoxyphenyl)ꢀ
3Hꢀnaphtho[2,1ꢀb]pyran (Photꢀ4). A solution of compound 2
(0.60 g, 1.5 mmol), Nꢀmethacryloylaminoacetic acid (0.21 g,
1.5 mmol), N,Nꢀdicyclohexylcarbodiimide (0.30 g, 1.5 mmol),
and 4ꢀpyrrolidinopyridine (0.023 g, 0.15 mmol) in anhydrous
dichloromethane (40 mL) was stirred at ∼20 °C for 16 h. N,NꢀDiꢀ
cyclohexylurea was filtered off, the filtrate was washed with waꢀ
ter (3×50 mL), 5% aq. acetic acid (3×50 mL), water (3×50 mL),
and dried with MgSO4. The organic solvent was evaporated
in vacuo. The final product (5 mL) was stirred in the benzꢀ
ene—ethyl acetate (2 : 1) mixture, filtered, and the filtrate was
subjected to chromatography on silica gel using benzene—ethyl
acetate (2 : 1) as an eluent. The yield was 0.46 g (59%), a light
pink powder; m.p. 138—140 °C. 1H NMR, δ: 1.91 (s, 3 H, Me);
3.69 (s, 6 H, (OMe)2); 4.28 (d, 2 H, CH2); 5.47 (s, 1 H,
CO—CH2); 5.81 (s, 1 H, CO—CH2); 6.59 (d, 1 H, 2ꢀH); 6.86
(m, 4 H, Ar); 7.40 (m, 5 H, Ar); 7.50 (m, 2 H, Ar); 7.59 (s, 1 H,
Ar); 7.81 (d, 1 H, 6ꢀH); 8.09 (d, 1 H, 1ꢀH); 8.63 (t, 1 H, NH).
5ꢀ(NꢀMethacryloylꢀεꢀaminohexanoyloxy)ꢀ3,3ꢀdi(4ꢀmethꢀ
oxyphenyl)ꢀ3Hꢀnaphtho[2,1ꢀb]pyran (Photꢀ3). Photochrom
Photꢀ3 was obtained according to the procedure for compound
Photꢀ4 using Nꢀmethacryloylꢀεꢀaminohexanoic acid as an acyꢀ
lating agent. The yield was 0.26 g (62%), a white powder; m.p.
The authors are grateful to S. V. Kurmaz for the synꢀ
thesis of the branched photochromic copolymer PolBꢀ1.
References
1. V. A. Barachevskii, G. I. Lashkov, V. A. Tsekhomskii, Foꢀ
tokhromizm i ego primenenie [Photochromism and its Applicaꢀ
tion], Khimiya, Moscow, 1977, 279 pp. (in Russian).
2. N. A. Plate, V. P. Shibaev, Grebneobraznye polimery i zhidkie
kristally [Combꢀlike Polymers and Liquid Crystals], Khimiya,
Moscow, 1980, 303 pp. (in Russian).
3. O. V. Kameneva, L. A. Smirnova, K. V. Kir´yanov, A. H.
Maslov, V. A. Barachevckii, A. P. Alekcandrov, H. M. Biꢀ
tyurin, Vysokomolekulyar. Soedin., Ser. A, 2003, 45, 1508
[Polym. Sci., Ser. A (Engl. Transl.), 2003, 45].
1
127—129 °C. H NMR, δ: 1.38 (m, 2 H, CH2); 1.45 (m, 2 H,
CH2); 1.71 (m, 2 H, CH2); 1.84 (s, 3 H, Me); 2.67 (t, 2 H, CH2);
3.07 (m, 2 H, CH2); 3.70 (s, 6 H, OMe); 5.29 (s, 1 H, =CH2);
5.63 (s, 1 H, =CH2); 6.51 (d, 1 H, Ar); 6.88 (d, 4 H, 3ꢀAr); 7.30
(d, 4 H, 3ꢀAr); 7.38—7.52 (m, 3 H, Ar); 7.60 (s, 1 H, 6ꢀH); 7.79
(d, 1 H, Ar); 7.86 (t, 1 H, NH); 8.11 (d, 1 H, Ar).
4. G. V. Korolev, M. L. Bubnova, Vysokomolekulyar. Soedin.,
Ser. C, 2007, 49, 1357 [Polym. Sci., Ser. with (Engl. Transl.),
2007, 49].
5. S. V. Kurmaz, I. S. Kochneva, E. O. Perepelitsina, G. V.
Korolev, V. P. Grachev, S. M. Aldoshin, Izv. Akad. Nauk,
Ser. Khim., 2007, 191 [Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2007,
56, 197].
6. S. V. Kurmaz, I. S. Kochneva, V. V. Ozhiganov, V. P.
Grachev, S. M. Aldoshin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2007, 417, 646
[Dokl. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), 2007].
7. V. P. Grachev, G. M. Bakova, S. V. Kurmaz, L. I. Makhonꢀ
ina, E. A. Yur´eva, S. M. Aldoshin, Vysokomolekulyar. Soeꢀ
din., Ser. A, 2011, 53, № 9 [Polym. Sci., Ser. A (Engl. Transl.),
2011, 53, No. 9].
Synthesis of photochromic copolymers. Linear copolymers of
EA (Polꢀ1, Polꢀ2, and Polꢀ3) were obtained by radical copolyꢀ
merization in ethanol (70 wt.%) in the presence of azobisꢀ
(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) as initiator (1•10–2 mol L–1). The poꢀ
lymerization was performed in the evacuated tubes at 60 °C until
the reaction reached completion (120 h). The branched copolyꢀ
mer of EA (PolBꢀ1) was synthesized by the threeꢀdimensional
radical copolymerization with butanediol diacrylate (BDDA),
which was controlled by the agent of the chain transfer, i.e.,
1ꢀdecanethiol, according to the method described earlier.8 The
content of the branching agent, BDDA and 1ꢀdecanethiol, was
12 mol.% with respect to EA. Conditions for the synthesis of
PolBꢀ1: T = 80 °C, the reaction time was 5.5 h, AIBN was the
initiator (0.02 mol L–1). The content of the reaction mixture in
toluene was 80 wt.%. The polymers that obtained were dried
in vacuo at ∼20 °C until the weight was constant.
8. S. V. Kurmaz, I. S. Kochneva, V. V. Ozhiganov, A. A. Batuꢀ
rina, G. A. Estrina, Zh. Prikl. Khim., 2008, 81, 1710 [Russ. J.
Appl. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), 2008, 81].
Photochemical studies. Absorption spectra of the samples
were recorded on an Ocean Optics HR 2000 spectrometer in the
automatic scanning mode through the given periods of time and
then processed as massifs of data using the software based on the
Igor Pro 4.0. Irradiation was produced by a DRShꢀ1000 UV lamp
Received March 4, 2011;
in revised form May 11, 2011