458 Organometallics, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1998
Hughes et al.
similarly accomplished by mercuration followed by
halogen substitution, analogous perfluorination of Cp
ligands has not been accomplished.6-8
ficant differences, corresponding syntheses of isomeri-
cally pure partially fluorinated cyclopentadienyl rings
were required. Here, we describe the selective prepara-
tion of the complete set of complexes containing partially
fluorinated cyclopentadienyl rings and their oxocyclo-
hexadienyl precursors. Studies confirming the approxi-
mate additivity of fluorine substituent effects in these
new cyclopentadienyl compounds were recently pub-
lished.23
In view of the challenges associated with the intro-
duction of fluorine directly into organometallic mol-
ecules, we have limited our synthetic approaches to
those which have all of the necessary carbon-fluorine
bonds in place before complexation of the ligand. In the
case of the perfluorocyclopentadienyl ligand, this posed
-
a significant problem; although the C5F5 anion is
known,9 attempts to use it as a precursor to transition-
metal complexes proved to be frustratingly unsuccess-
ful.10 Our eventual synthetic approach to fluorinated
cyclopentadienyl ligands resulted from the realization
that certain six-membered organic rings underwent ring
contraction to give five-membered rings, with elimina-
tion of CO, under conditions of flash vacuum thermoly-
sis.11 For example, in this fashion, o-benzoquinones are
converted to cyclopentadienones,12-14 2-pyrone is trans-
formed to furan,15 and hexafluorocyclohexadienones
afford hexafluorocyclopentadiene.16 Coupling of this
latent knowledge with subsequent reports of the prepa-
ration of ruthenium complexes containing the η5-oxo-
cyclohexadienyl (η5-phenoxide) ligand17,18 suggested that
analogous decarbonylations of the latter complexes to
give η5-cyclopentadienyl ligands could be achieved,
especially if they afforded stable metallocenes as the
final organometallic product. Indeed, initial attempts
were successful in affording the pentafluorocyclopenta-
dienyl complexes 119 and 220 via flash vacuum ther-
molysis (FVT) of the corresponding complexes 3 and 4,
Chart 1. The effects of perfluorination on the electronic
properties of the cyclopentadienyl ligand were evaluated
by measuring the gas-phase ionization free energy of
1. It proved to be 18.5 kcal/mol higher than that of [Ru-
(C5Me5)(C5H5)], confirming that perfluorination of a Cp
ligand increases its electron-withdrawing ability, al-
though the effects of σ-electron withdrawal are, not un-
expectedly, strongly attenuated by π-donation from the
fluorines.21 Similar conclusions result from a detailed
comparisons of the photoelectron spectra of 1 and its
analogues [Ru(C5Me5)(C5H5)] and [Ru(C5Me5)(C5Cl5)].22
In order to establish whether the effects of perfluori-
nation of the cyclopentadienyl were additive and whether
the specific location of fluorines on the ring made signi-
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
P a r tia lly F lu or in a ted (2-6-η5-Oxocycloh exa d i-
en yl)r u t h en iu m
Com p lexes
[R u Cp *(2-6-η5-
C5F 5-n Hn CO)] (n ) 1-4). The desired oxocyclohexa-
dienyl complexes, [RuCp*(2-6-η5-C5F5-nHnCO)] n )
1-4, 5-11 (see Table 2), were synthesized similarly to
their perfluorinated analogue 3.19 Refluxing the ruthe-
nium tetramer [RuCp*Cl]4 (Cp* ) η5-C5Me5) in aceto-
nitrile afforded, in situ, the [RuCp*(CH3CN)3]+ cation,
which was subsequently treated with the Tl+ salts of
the appropriate commercially available fluorophenols to
afford the corresponding partially fluorinated oxocyclo-
hexadienyl complexes 5-11 in good yields.
All oxocyclohexadienyl products were characterized
by IR, 1H and 19F NMR spectra, and microanalysis; data
1
are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The H NMR spectra
of 5-11 all exhibit a sharp singlet in the region 1.79-
1.90 ppm for the Cp* protons, with multiplets in the
region 3.9-5.7 ppm corresponding to the protons of the
fluorooxocyclohexadienyl ligands. Their 19F NMR spec-
tra displayed the expected number of resonances in the
appropriate ratio in the region from -160 to -194 ppm
the significant upfield shift of the fluorine resonances
from those of the corresponding free fluorophenols being
consistent with η5 coordination of the phenoxide ligands.
1
The 19F-19F, 19F-1H, H-1H coupling constants listed
in Table 2 were obtained directly from the H and 19F
1
NMR spectra.
In confirmation of the 2-6-η5 coordination mode of
the phenoxide ligands, the IR spectra of 5-11 showed
a strong CdO stretch. The position of this stretch is
dependent upon the number and relative location of the
fluorine atoms on the ligand. For the fully fluorinated
ring in 3, the observed value of υCO is 1620 cm-1 19
as
;
expected, all values observed for 5-11 lie below this
value and are consistent with a predominantly inductive
electron-withdrawing effect of fluorine, exercised more
potently at locations closer to the oxygen atom. The
presence of two ortho-fluorines, in 5 and 9, give the
highest values of υCO (1582-1574 cm-1; Table 1), a
single ortho-fluorine (in 6, 7, 8, and 10) affords values
between 1541 and 1555 cm-1), and no ortho-fluorines
(in 11) give the lowest value of 1534 cm-1. In addition
to CdO stretches, broad absorption bands around 3450
cm-1 attributable to water were also observed in the IR
spectra of 6-11. Consistent with this observation, the
microanalysis data of the compounds (except for 7 and
8) did not correlate to the calculated percentages of
(6) Hedberg, F. L.; Rosenberg, H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 3239.
(7) Hedberg, F. L.; Rosenberg, H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 870.
(8) Winter, C. H.; Han, Y.; Ostrander, R. L.; Rheingold, A. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Engl. 1993, 32, 1161.
(9) Paprott, G; Seppelt, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4060.
(10) Paprott, G.; Lehmann, S.; Seppelt, K. Chem. Ber. 1988, 121,
727.
(11) For a discussion of this technique, see: Magrath, J .; Fowler,
F. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2171 and references cited therein.
(12) DeJ ongh, D. C.; Van Fossen, R. Y.; Bourgeois, C. F. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1967, 271.
(13) DeJ ongh, D. C.; Brent, D. A.; Van Fossen, R. Y. J . Org. Chem.
1971, 36, 1469.
(14) Chapman, O. L.; McIntosh, C. L. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Com-
mun. 1971, 770.
(15) Brent, D. A.; Hribar, J . D.; DeJ ongh, D. C. J . Org. Chem. 1970,
35, 135.
(16) Soelch, R. R.; Mauer, G. W.; Lemal, D. M. J . Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 5845.
(17) Bu¨cken, K.; Koelle, U.; Pasch, R.; Ganter, B. Organometallics
1996, 15, 3095.
(18) Loren, S. D.; Campion, B. K.; Heyn, R. H.; Tilley, T. D.; Bursten,
B. E.; Luth, K. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4712.
(19) Curnow, O. J .; Hughes, R. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5895.
(20) Hughes, R. P.; Zheng, X.; Rheingold, A. L.; Ostrander, R. L.
Organometallics 1994, 13, 1567.
(21) Richardson, D. E.; Ryan, M. F.; Geiger, W. E.; Chin, T. T.;
Hughes, R. P.; Curnow, O. J . Organometallics 1993, 12, 613.
(22) Lichtenberger, D. L.; Elkadi, Y.; Gruhn, N.; Hughes, R. P.;
Curnow, O. J .; Zheng, X. Organometallics 1997, 16, 5209.
(23) Richardson, D. E.; Lang, L.; Eyler, J . R.; Zheng, X.; Morse, C.
A.; Hughes, R. P. Organometallics 1997, 16, 149.