M. Kuwahara et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 (2006) 2518–2526
2525
then stirred under an H2 atmosphere at room tempera-
ture overnight. The reaction mixture was filtered with
a membrane filter (Millex-LH, Millipore) to remove
the catalyst, and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness.
The residue was purified by reversed-phase HPLC with
a 3.5–70% gradient of acetonitrile in triethylammonium
acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.2) over 35 min at a flow
subjected to the TA Cloningꢂ method: Taq DNA poly-
merase has a non-template-dependent activity that adds
a single 20-deoxyadenosine at the 30-end of PCR prod-
uct. Cloning was performed using a TA Cloningꢂ kit
(Invitrogen) according to the instruction manual and
five samples were chosen at random from among single
colonies derived from modified DNA for sequencing.
Plasmids extracted from the single colonies were se-
quenced with a Genetic Analyzer 310 (ABI) according
to standard protocol using a BigDye Terminatorꢂ v3.0
Sequencing Kit together with primer #3.
rate of 1.0 mL/min to give the analogue TC6S
00
(0.038 lmol) in 15% yield from TC6S . ESI-MS (negative
ion mode) m/z: found 710.0; calcd for [(MꢁH)ꢁ] 710.1.
4.3.16. 5-((2-(6-(Threoninamido)hexylamino)-2-oxoeth-
yl))-20-deoxyuridine-50-triphosphate (TC6T). This product
was prepared by coupling of TC6 (0.58 lmol) with
N-a-carbobenzoxy-O-benzyl-L-threonine a-N-succinim-
idyl ester followed by hydrogenation to give the
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientif-
ic Research on Priority Areas (B) and (C) from the Min-
istry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology of Japan, and PRESTO from the Japan Sci-
ence and Technology Agency.
analogue TC6T (0.070 lmol) in 12% yield from TC6
.
ESI-MS (negative ion mode) m/z: found 724.0; calcd
for [(MꢁH)ꢁ] 724.1.
4.4. PCR amplification
PCR experiments were performed with a 20 lL reaction
volume containing 10 ng pUC 18 template DNA, prim-
ers #1 and #2 at 0.4 lM each, 1.0 U KOD Dash DNA
polymerase, reaction buffer supplied with enzyme (at
1times concentration), and triphosphates at 200 lM
each; PCR with natural triphosphates dATP, dGTP,
dCTP, and TTP was used as a positive control; PCR
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
with one of the dUTP analogues (TC6, TC2, TDH, TAL
,
,
References and notes
T
T
PR, TC6H, TC6K, TC6R, TC6F,0 TC6W, TC6L, TC6P,TC6Q
0
C6S, TC6S , TC6T, TC6C, TC6C , TC6D or TC6E) instead
1. Gold, L.; Polisky, B.; Uhlenbeck, O.; Yarus, M. Annu.
Rev. Biochem. 1995, 64, 763.
of TTP was used for the actual assays (Fig. 1); PCR with
dATP, dGTP, and dCTP (water was added instead of
TTP) was used as a negative control. For all amplifica-
tions, a hot start (1 min at 94 ꢁC) was used, followed
by amplification and final incubation (5 min at 74 ꢁC).
Conditions for the amplification process (denaturing,
annealing, and extension) were as follows; condition 1
(30 cycles, 0.5 min at 94 ꢁC, 0.5 min at 52 ꢁC, and
1 min at 74 ꢁC); condition 2 (30 cycles, 0.5 min at
94 ꢁC, 1 min at 50 ꢁC, and 2 min at 74 ꢁC); condition 3
(20 cycles, 0.5 min at 94 ꢁC, 0.5 min at 52 ꢁC, and
1 min at 74 ꢁC). PCR products were resolved by dena-
turing PAGE, visualized by ethidium bromide staining,
and gel images were recorded on a Molecular Imagerꢂ
FX (Bio-Rad). The intensity of each band correspond-
ing to full-length DNA product was quantified using
Quantity Oneꢂ software. The amount of full-length
PCR product formed during reaction with TC6 was set
at 1. Here, calculated relative yields are averages of five
independent experiments.
2. Santoro, S. W.; Joyce, G. F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
1997, 94, 4262.
3. Breaker, R. R. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 371.
4. Wilson, D. S.; Szostak, J. W. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999,
68, 611.
5. Osborne, S. E.; Ellington, A. D. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 349.
6. Famulok, M.; Mayer, G.; Blind, M. Chem. Res. 2000, 33,
591.
7. Latham, J. A.; Johnson, R.; Toole, J. J. Nucleic Acids Res.
1994, 22, 2817.
8. Battersby, T. R.; Ang, D. N.; Burgstaller, P.; Jurczyk, S.
C.; Bowser, M. T.; Buchanan, D. D.; Kennedy, R. T.;
Benner, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9781.
9. Santoro, S. W.; Joyce, G. F.; Sakthivel, K.; Gramatikova,
S., ; Barbas, C. F., III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2433.
10. Kusser, W. Rev. Mol. Biotechnol. 2000, 74, 27.
11. Verma, S.; Jager, S.; Thum, O.; Famulok, M. Chem. Rec.
2003, 3, 51.
12. Masud, M. M.; Kuwahara, M.; Ozaki, H.; Sawai, H.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 1111.
´ `
13. Perrin, D. M.; Garestier, T.; Helene, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 1556.
14. May, J. P.; Ting, R.; Lermer, L.; Thomas, J. M.; Roupioz,
Y.; Perrin, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4145.
15. Sidorov, A. V.; Grasby, J. A.; Williams, D. M. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1591.
´ `
16. Perrin, D. M.; Garestier, T.; Helene, C. Nucleosides
Nucleotides 1999, 18, 377.
17. Thum, O.; Ja¨ger, S.; Famulok, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 3990.
18. Takagi, M.; Nishioka, M.; Kakihara, H.; Kitabayashi, M.;
Inoue, H.; Kawakami, B.; Oka, M.; Imanaka, T. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 4504.
4.5. Cloning and sequencing of PCR products
Modified DNA was purified by agarose gel electropho-
resis and eluted from the gel into TBE buffer (45 mM
Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA). The eluted sample was con-
verted into natural DNA by a second PCR using KOD
Dash DNA polymerase under condition 1. After purifi-
cation by agarose gel electrophoresis and elution, the
dsDNA product was re-amplified by a third PCR using
Taq DNA polymerase under condition 3 and was