DNA-Directed Synthesis of Oligomers
A R T I C L E S
Discussion
monomers and to provide a template for formation of a PANI
oligomer in the emeraldine oxidation state; once this is
completed, the properties of the conducting nanowires should
be largely independent of the structural fate of the conjoined
DNA.
There is rapidly growing interest in the preparation and
investigation of nanowires.18-20 These are structures that have
a lateral dimension in the nm range, longitudinal dimension in
the range from nm to µm, and electrical properties characteristic
of conductors or semiconductors. Similarly, there is growing
awareness that the unique properties of DNA may be exploited
to fabricate nanowires and other electrical and mechanical
objects of this length scale.21-23 We describe here a novel
approach applicable to the fabrication of such devicessthe
synthesis of conducting polymers conjoined to DNA. Specifi-
cally, designed DNA sequences with aniline-containing mono-
mers covalently linked to the nucleobases can be used in directed
self-assembly that takes advantage of the sequence program-
mability properties of DNA to exercise precise control on
polymer formation. Treatment of these aniline-modified du-
plexes with H2O2 in the presence of HRP leads to oligoaniline
formation.
The applicability of this method for formation of DNA-
conjoined polymers to monomers beyond aniline was demon-
strated by showing that the DNA(Y) series, which contains
covalently linked 4-aminobiphenyl groups, forms conjoined
oligomers. The 4-aminobiphenyl oligomers formed in this
reaction possess distinctive chemical and electronic properties
compared with polyaniline, while at the same time PAB and
PANI retain some common structural features such as π-con-
jugation and a preferred head-to-tail orientation.16 Significantly,
the presence of the additional phenyl ring in the 4-aminobiphenyl
monomers requires a change to the pattern for covalent linkage
from contiguous to alternating bases along one strand of the
DNA because the 4-aminobiphenyl spans a larger region of the
major groove. Clearly, structural constraints resulting from the
covalent attachment of these monomers to DNA control the
oligomerization to form poly(4-aminobiphenyl); i.e., the reaction
of DNA(Y4) leads to oligomer formation, but DNA(Y2) does
not. These results highlight again the templating ability of DNA
in controlling the formation of conjoined oligomers.
There are meaningful differences in the properties of PAB-
DNA(Y4) and PANI-DNA(Y6). The diimine transition band
for poly(4-aminobiphenyl) is considerably blue-shifted compared
with PANI-DNA(X6), which appears at 730 nm. This is
attributed to a less delocalized character for the quinoid-imine
in the structure of PAB, see Figure 7. Notably, even tetramers
of aniline in the emeraldine oxidation state exhibit absorption
bands at ca. 750 nm, albeit at shorter wavelengths compared
with long chain polyanilines (∼850 nm).25 In contrast, the
structure of poly(4-aminobiphenyl) restricts delocalization of
quinoid-imines resulting in the blue-shift of the diimine optical
transition.
Structure and Oxidation States of Conjoined PANI and
PAB. One advantage of polyaniline is its wide and controllable
range of oxidation states. These redox states have been
correlated with the electrical properties of these conducting
polymers.26 The absorption spectrum of PANI-DNA(X6)
formed in the reaction with HRP/H2O2 is indicative of the
emeraldine oxidation state. Since the emeraldine oxidation state
of PANI-DNA(X6) lies between the fully reduced (leuco) and
fully oxidized (pernigraniline) forms, it is possible to manipulate
the redox state of these polymers with appropriate reagents.27,28
The addition of ammonium persulfate, a strong chemical
oxidizing agent, to PANI-DNA(X6) causes its absorbance at
730 nm to diminish while causing a simultaneous increase in
the absorbance at 550 nm. The absorbance at 730 nm is
attributed to diimine radical cations and is related to the presence
of similar numbers of reduced and oxidized units that character-
ize the emeraldine oxidation state.27 Further oxidation of the
PANI is expected to yield a larger number of diimine units with
Forming DNA-Conjoined Oligomers of Aniline and 4-Ami-
nobiphenyl. In contrast to the DNA templated polymerization
of free anilines in solution, the covalent attachment of the aniline
monomers to DNA enforces a particular structural orientation
and restricts certain interactions between moieties on different
DNA molecules. This determines the nature of the polymers
that can be formed. In particular, the observation that charac-
teristic oligoaniline absorption bands are formed only when all
three components of the ternary complex DNA(2), DNA(Y3′),
and DNA(Y3′′) are present confirms the role template and
scaffold play in controlling oligomer formation by preventing
the reaction of monomers attached to different DNA molecules.
The properties of the conjoined PANI oligomers that are
formed in this process indicate both a close similarity to
conventional conducting polymers and unique attributes resulting
from their linkage to DNA. The absorbance bands of PANI-
DNA(X6) at 420 and 730 nm are attributed to π-π* and
diimine radical cations, respectively, and are indicative of the
conducting “pseudo-proton doped” emeraldine oxidation state
of PANI.7 The PANI linked DNA(X6) oligomer maintains a
duplex structure, albeit with reduced thermal stability. This is
expected since the wrapping of polyaniline onto the DNA has
been found to induce changes in the secondary structure of DNA
leading to the formation of an over-wound polymorph.24
Detailed molecular modeling has suggested that while the region
of the DNA duplex bearing the PANI oligomer is distorted and
exhibits reduced inter-base pair hydrogen bonding, the overall
stability of the conjoined system is improved by incorporating
longer flanking duplex DNA regions (“leads”).7 Regardless, the
fate of the DNA duplex after conjoined polymer formation is
of secondary importance for the creation of conducting polymer
nanowires. The role of the DNA is to order the covalently linked
(18) Noll, J. D.; Nicholson, M. A.; Vanpatten, P. G.; Chung, C. W.; Myrick,
M. L. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998, 145, 3320-3328.
(19) Maynor, B. W.; Filocamo, S. F.; Grinstaff, M. W.; Liu, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 522-523.
(20) Wu, C.-G.; Bein, T. Science 1994, 264, 1757-1759.
(21) Nickels, P.; Dittmer, W. U.; Beyer, S.; Kotthaus, J. P.; Simmel, F. C.
Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 1524-1529.
(25) Kulszewicz-Bajer, I.; Rozalska, I.; Kurylek, M. New J. Chem. 2004, 28,
669-675.
(22) Ma, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, G.; He, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7097-
(26) Focke, W. W.; Wnek, G. E.; Wei, Y. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 5813-
7101.
5818.
(23) Zhu, L.; Lukeman, P. S.; Canary, J. W.; Seeman, N. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 10178-10179.
(24) Nagarajan, R.; Liu, W.; Kumar, J.; Tripathy, S.; Bruno, F. F.; Samuelson,
L. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 3921-3927.
(27) de Albuquerque, J. E.; Mattoso, L. H. C.; Faria, R. M.; Masters, J. G.;
MacDiarmid, A. G. Synth. Met. 2004, 146, 1-10.
(28) Asturias, G. E.; MacDiarmid, A. G.; Mccall, R. P.; Epstein, A. J. Synth.
Met. 1989, E157-E162.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 10, 2008 2971