The hydrolysis of silyl formate affords silanol as a copro-
duct. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted to the
oxidation of hydrosilanes to silanols9 because of the highly
utility of the oxidation products for silicon-based polymers10
and organic donors.11 The above formic acid synthesis
procedure through consecutive hydrosilylation/hydration
enables oxidation of hydrosilanes to the useful silanols.
Herein, we report a copper-catalyzed formic acid synth-
esis from CO2, hydrosilanes, and H2O through the con-
secutive hydrosilylation of CO2 and hydrolysis of silyl
formate. PMHS can be used as a hydrosilane. Further-
more, oxidation of aromatic, aliphatic, and alkoxy hydro-
silanes to silanols usingCO2 as anoxidant isdemonstrated.
A copper hydride complex having a 1,2-bis(diphenyl-
phosphino)benzene (1) ligand has been reported as a
new, active reduction catalyst for organic carbonyl com-
pounds.12,13 First, we examined the reaction of 1 atm of
To confirm the reaction pathway shown in Scheme 1, 1H
NMR analysis was conducted (Figure S5, Supporting
Information). After the reaction of PMHS with CO2 in
the presence of the Cu catalyst, a signal assignable to Si-H
of PMHS at 4.7 ppm disappeared and a broad signal
assignable to Si-OC(O)H appeared at 8.1 ppm. The methyl
group connected to the Si atom was shifted to 0.4 ppm from
0.2 ppm. Then, addition of H2O to the reaction mixture
allowed formation of formic acid (HCOOH, 8.0 ppm) and
the silyl formate signals (8.1 and 0.4 ppm) disappeared.
GCꢀMS analysis also revealed the formation of formic
acid.
Scheme 2. Copper-Catalyzed Reaction of Diphenylmethylsilane
with C18O2
CO2 in the presence of PMHS, Cu(OAc)2 H2O, and ligand
3
1. An excess amount of CO2 compared with the hydro-
silane was used in a balloon apparatus. As shown in
Table 1, entry 1, the hydrosilylation was complete within
4 h. Next, H2O was added, and the reaction mixture was
allowed to further react at room temperature for 1 h,
affording 91% yield of formic acid. Hydrosilylation did not
proceed at all in the absence of Cu(OAc)2 H2O or ligand 1
(entries 2 and 3). The product was not obtained under Ar
atmosphere instead of CO2 (entry 5). In the Cu(OAc)2
3
3
H2Oꢀ1 system, the formic acid yield increased to 95% at
60 °C (entry 6). Other phosphine ligands were not effective
under the reaction conditions (entries 7 and 8).
Transformation of CO2 to formic acid through silyl
formate was confirmed by the reaction using C18O2 and
13CO2. Scheme 2 shows the results of the reaction using
C18O2. The reaction of diphenylmethylsilane with C18O2
Table 1. Formic Acid Synthesis from CO2 with PMHSa
afforded diphenylmethylsilyl formate with >95% of 18
O
content: m/z [Mþ]: 246, [Mþ ꢀ CH3]: 231 (100), 229 (4.4),
227 (<1.0) (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The
successive hydrolysis of the silyl formate proceeded by
addition of H2O, giving formic acid with >95% of 18O
entry
catalyst
ligand conv of SiꢀHb (%) yieldb (%)
1
Cu(OAc)2 H2O
1
>99
11
8
91
0
3
2
Cu(OAc)2 H2O none
3
(7) Matsuo, T.; Kawaguchi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12362.
(8) Riduan, S. N.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, J. Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 3322.
3
none
none
1
0
4
none
19
17
96
30
<1
0
5c
6d
7d
8d
Cu(OAc)2 H2O
1
1
0
3
(9) Recent examples: (a) Mitsudome, T.; Arita, S.; Mori, H.; Mizugaki,
T.; Jitsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7938. (b)
Mitsudome, T.; Noujima, A.; Mizugaki, T.; Jitsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 5302. (c) Ison, E. A.; Corbin, R. A.; Abu-Omar,
M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11938. (d) Corbin, R. A.; Ison, E. A.;
Abu-Omar, M. M. Dalton Trans. 2009, 2850. (e) Ishimoto, R.; Kamata, K.;
Mizuno, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8900. (f) Kikukawa, Y.;
Kuroda, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Mizuno, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
2434.
(10) (a) Chandrasekhar, V.; Boomishankar, R.; Nagendran, S.
Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5847. (b) Murugavel, R.; Walawalkar, M. G.;
Dan, M.; Roesky, H. W.; Rao, C. N. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 763.
(c) Zhou, Q.; Yan, S.; Han, C. C.; Xie, P.; Zhang, R. Adv. Mater. 2008,
20, 2970.
Cu(OAc)2 H2O
95
18
trace
3
3
Cu(OAc)2 H2O dpppe
f
Cu(OAc)2 H2O PPh3
3
a Reaction conditions: CO2 (1 atm, balloom), PMHS (SiꢀH: 1.0
mmol), Cu catalyst (5.0 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 mmol), ligand (7.5 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 mmol), 1,4-
dioxane (2.0 mL), 100 °C, 4 h. After the hydrosilylation, H2O (0.2 mL)
was added, and the mixture was stirred at rt for 1 h. b Determined by 1H
NMR using an internal standard. Based on SiꢀH. Conv of SiꢀH was
measured before the addition of H2O. c Under 1 atm of Ar. d 60 °C,
30 min. e 1,3-Bis(diphenylphosphino)propane. f 1.5 ꢁ 10ꢀ2 mmol of PPh3.
(11) (a) Hirabayashi, K.; Nishihara, Y.; Mori., A.; Hiyama, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7893. (b) Hirabayashi, K.; Kawashima, J.;
Nishihara, Y.; Mori, A.; Hiyama, T. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 299. (c) Denmark,
S. E.; Werner, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16382.
(5) Eisenschmid, T. G.; Eisenberg, R. Organometallics 1989, 8, 1822.
(6) (a) Jansen, A.; Pitter, S. J. Mol. Catal. A 2004, 217, 41. (b)
Deglmann, P.; Ember, E.; Hofmann, P.; Pitter, S.; Walter, O. Chem.;
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢀ
(12) (a) Baker, B. A.; Boskovic, Z. V.; Lipshutz, B. H. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 289. (b) Lipshutz, B. H. Synlett 2009, 509.
€
Eur. J. 2007, 13, 2864. (c) Suss-Fink, G.; Reiner, J. J. Organomet. Chem.
1981, 221, C36. (d) Koinuma, H.; Kawakami, F.; Kato, H.; Hirai, H.
€
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 213. (e) Jansen, A.; Gorls, H.;
(13) For Stryker’s reagent, see: (a) Mahoney, W. S.; Brestensky,
D. M.; Stryker, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 291. (b) Mahoney,
W. S.; Stryker, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8818.
Pitter, S. Organometallics 2000, 19, 135. (f) Jessop, P. G. Top. Catal.
1998, 3, 95.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 10, 2012
2643