Communication
boxylative fluorination of lithium 2-pyridylacetates 3 yields 2-
(fluoroalkyl)pyridines 2. Furthermore, methyl esters 4 of 2-pyri-
dylacetic acids can be converted to 2 in a one-pot manner by
the decarboxylative fluorination of lithium salts 3 (Scheme 1c).
This method enables us to convert a methyl ester group into a
fluoride group in a one-pot manner without using expensive
transition-metal catalysts. Various starting compounds, methyl
2-pyridylacetates 4 with two alkyl substituents (R1 and R2), can
be prepared by simple SN2 alkylation of nonsubstituted 2-pyri-
dylacetate; which is also an advantage of the method.
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
Entry
[F+]
Solvent
Yield of 2a
[%][b]
Yield of 5a
[%][b]
1
2
3[c]
4[c,d]
5
6
7
8
Selectfluor
NFSI
–
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
toluene
MeCN
THF
90
71
0
0
0
16
17
30
0
6
0
68
18
65
0
We began by synthesizing the substituted 2-pyridylacetic
acid 1a by alkaline hydrolysis of the corresponding methyl
ester 4a and subsequent neutralization (Scheme 2). Although
1a was fluorinated to yield 2a, involving decarboxylation by
treatment with Selectfluor, even in the absence of a base,[14]
1a was difficult to handle because it slowly decomposed spon-
taneously, even at room temperature, to generate the proton-
ated product 5a (Scheme 2). During the above-mentioned in-
vestigation, we noticed that the lithium salt of 1a is more
stable toward decarboxylative protonation than 1a itself.[15]
–
Selectfluor
Selectfluor
Selectfluor
Selectfluor
MeOH
55
[a] Reactions were carried out with 3a and 3 equiv of fluorinating reagent
at room temperature for 8 h, unless otherwise noted. [b] Determined
after silica gel column purification. [c] No fluorinating reagent was em-
ployed. [d] Reaction was carried out at 1008C.
one-pot fashion. To that end, 4a was treated with lithium hy-
droxide in MeOH/H2O. Following hydrolysis, the solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure. DMF and Selectfluor were
then added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature.
The reaction successfully afforded the desired product 2a in
85% yield over two steps (Table 2). Thus, we examined the
substrate scope of the sequential hydrolyses and decarboxyla-
tive fluorinations of methyl 2-pyridylacetates 4. As summarized
in Table 2, several methyl 2-pyridylacetates 4 were converted
to the corresponding fluorides 2 in good yields using the one-
pot procedure. The reaction tolerated several functional
groups such as alkenes, nitro groups, cyano groups, and alkyl
ethers. The reaction with quinoline and isoquinoline derivatives
also yielded the corresponding fluorides 2m and 2n, respec-
tively.
Scheme 2. Synthesis and decarboxylative fluorination of 1a. a) LiOH
(5 equiv), MeOH/H2O (3:1), 808C (bath temp.), 8 h, followed by neutralization
with HCl; b) Selectfluor (3 equiv), DMF, rt, 12 h.
Hence, we examined the reactivity of the lithium salt 3a to-
wards decarboxylative fluorination. Lithium salt 3a was ob-
tained in 90% yield by filtration of the precipitate following al-
kaline hydrolysis of 4a (Scheme 3). Treatment of 3a with Se-
Encouraged by the successful decarboxylative fluorinations
of a,a-disubstituted 2-pyridylacetates, we examined the reac-
tions of a-monosubstituted 2-pyridylacetates; 4o was reacted
using a procedure similar to that shown in Table 2. The difluori-
nated product 6o was obtained in 64% yield, along with the
monofluorinated product 2o in 22% yield (Table 3). The reac-
tion is supposed to proceed by base-mediated a-fluorination
of lithium 2-pyridylacetate and subsequent decarboxylative flu-
orination. The reactions of several a-monosubstituted 2-pyridy-
lacetates 4p–t afforded the corresponding 2-(difluoroalkyl)pyri-
dines 6p–t in one-pot processes, whereas the use of 4u–w af-
forded the monofluorinated products 2u–w in good yields.
Since electrophilic fluorinating reagents accelerate the de-
carboxylation of 3a, as indicated by the results shown in
Table 1, entries 1–3, we proposed the reaction mechanism
shown in Scheme 4. An electrophilic fluorine atom on Select-
fluor approaches the nitrogen atom on a pyridine ring to pro-
mote decarboxylation by forming N-fluoro-1,2-dihydropyridine
intermediate I, which would immediately isomerize to afford 2-
(fluoroalkyl)pyridines 2. Easy decarboxylation from 2-pyridyla-
cetates 4 can be explained by the resonance stabilization of
Scheme 3. Synthesis of lithium carboxylate 3a.
lectfluor in DMF successfully afforded the desired fluoride 2a
in 90% yield without generation of the protonated product 5a
(Table 1, entry 1). When N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide (NFSI) was
used as the fluorinating reagent, a slightly lower yield of 4a
was obtained (entry 2). Interestingly, decarboxylation did not
occur at room temperature in the absence of any electrophilic
fluorinating reagent (entry 3), whereas it occurred by heating
to 1008C (entry 4). These results indicate that the fluorinating
reagent accelerated the decarboxylation of 3a in some way.
Solvent screening revealed DMF as the optimum solvent (en-
tries 1, 5–8).
We also envisaged that hydrolysis of methyl ester 4 and sub-
sequent decarboxylative fluorination could be performed in a
&
&
Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1 – 5
2
ꢀ 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!