R
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONSV
3
hydroamination reaction sequence to afford 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one derivatives.[15]
Cossy and coworkers demonstrated that 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one derivative could
be
synthesized
from
ynamides
and
boronic
acids
via
Pd-catalyzed
Heck–Suzuki–Miyaura domino reaction.[16]
Apart from Alper and Cossy’s work, there are many more examples of Palladium
promoted synthesis of 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one under diversified reaction condi-
tions including sonochemical condition, microwave condition and even in an aqueous
micellar medium.[17a–j]
Another elegant strategy toward 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one was developed by
Lee[18a] and Patel[18b] via decarboxylative cross-coupling of 2-halobenzamide and aryl
alkynyl acids under Cu-catalyzed condition. Cu (II) mediated oxidative alkynylation and
intramolecular annulation is another prominent entry to 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one
synthesis by You et al.[19] However the substrate scope of arene was restricted to N-
(quinolin-8-yl) benzamide only. Another Cu (II) catalyzed, ligand assisted synthesis of
the title compound was reported by Zeng et al.[20a] though the reaction time was suffi-
ciently prolonged. Recently Surya Praksh and his coworkers[20b] reported a Cu (I) cata-
lyzed tandem desilylation-hydroamination strategy for the synthesis of isoindoline.
Though, the method required higher temperatures and costly starting materials. Other
noteworthy copper-catalyzed methods offering 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one derivatives
were reported by Phukan,[20c] Yao,[20d] and Kumar[20e] with their own merits and draw-
backs. Though many metal-free and transition metal-catalyzed methods are already
known to access 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one derivatives, issues like regioselectivity
(5-Exo vs 6-endo cyclization) and chemoselectivity (due to nucleophilicity of O- and N-
atom of amide moiety) are not fully resolved. In fact, a mixture of compounds was
obtained in several cases due to regio- and chemoselectivity issues.[21] Herein, we report
a copper(I) promoted, ligand-free approach to access (Z)-3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one
derivatives with complete regio- and stereo-selectivity.
Results and discussion
Transition metal-catalyzed approaches toward 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one are mainly
restricted to palladium and copper. And more commonly, a suitable ligand or additives
were used in all the methods reported earlier. According to the reported literature, a
plausible mechanism of this domino reaction (Described in Scheme 1) consisted of
Sonogashira cross-coupling between 2-halobenzamide and terminal alkyne or alkynyl
acid (via copper (l)-acetylide intermediate A, oxidative addition B, and reductive elimin-
ation C), followed by base mediated amide deprotonation. Finally, nucleophilic attacks
of amide anion D on transition metal-alkyne complex complete the intramolecular cyc-
lization to afford 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one derivatives. Though, a variety of ligands
such as L-proline, N,N-dimethylglycine, pipecolinic acid, 2-picolinic acid, 1,10-phenan-
threne, TMEDA, DMEDA, SPhos, XantPhos, and other phosphine based ligands have
been used in different transition metal assisted approaches, the evidence for the benefi-
cial effect of ligands are not mentioned elsewhere. We anticipated that this domino
reaction may proceed equally well without using any ligand or additive if we start with
the iodoarene substrate. Iodide might play a dual role as Sonogashira coupling partner