236
A. Evidente et al. / Phytochemistry 53 (2000) 231±237
cis-4-azido-L-proline (7, 200 mg). The intermediates 4±
7 were characterized by the following physical and
spectroscopic properties compared with the very few
spectroscopic data available from literature (Andreatta
et al., 1967; Portoghese & Mikhail, 1966 ).
UV lmax nm ꢀlog e 227 (4.1); IR nmax cm 1: 2108,
1757, 1598 [lit. 15: nmax (CHCl3) 2108, 1750]; 1H-
NMR, d: 7.82 (2H, Ph), 7.34 (2H, Ph), 4.53 (1H, dd,
0
J2, 3 9:0 and J2, 3 4:1 Hz, H-2), 4.07 (1H, m, H-4),
3.75 (3H, s, OMe), 3.65 (1H, dd, J4, 5 6:0 and
0
0
J5, 5 10:9 Hz, H-5), 3.33 (1H, ddd, J3, 5 1:0,
0
0
3.6. N-Tosyl-trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline (4)
J4, 5 4:0 and J5, 5 10:9 Hz, H-5'), 2.46 (3H, s,
0
MePh), 2.36 (1H, dddd, J2, 3 9:0, J3, 3 13:4, J3, 4
4 had: mp 148±1508C; a2D5: 101.3 (c 0.6, EtOH);
4:5 and J3, 5 1:0 Hz, H-3), 2.26 (1H, dt, J2; 3 J3 ,
0
0
0
23
D
0
[Portoghese & Mikhail, 1966: mp 153±1558C.; a
4 4:5 and J3, 3 13:4 Hz, H-3'); EIMS, m/z (rel.
105.48 (c 2% EtOH)]; UV (MeOH) lmax nm ꢀlog e
228 (4.0); IR nmax cm 1: 3395, 1736, 1598; 1H-NMR
data (CD3OD), d: 7.77 (2H, Ph), 7.41 (2H, Ph), 4.35
int.): 265 [M-CO2Me]+ (55), 237 [M-CO2Me-N2]+
(27), 155 [Ts]+ (88), 91 [C7H7]+ (100).
(1H, m, H-4), 4.25 (1H, t, J2; 3 J2; 3 7:9 Hz, H-2),
3.10. N 1,N4-Ditosyl-cis-4-amino-L-proline methyl ester
(9)
0
0
3.59 (1H, dd, J4, 5 4:2 and J5, 5 10:9 Hz, H-5),
0
0
0
3.28 (1H, ddd, J3, 5 = 1.5, J4, 5 2:6 and J5, 5 10:9
Hz, H-5'), 2.44 (3H, s, MePh), 2.11 (2H, m, H2-3); EI
MS, m/z (rel. int.): 240 [M-COOH]+ (43), 155 [Ts]+
(29), 91 [C7H7]+ (81), 86 [M-Co2-Ts]+ (30), 58 (100)
N-Tosyl-cis-4-azido-L-proline methyl ester (7, 24 mg)
in MeOH (1 ml) was hydrogenated in the presence of
10% Pd on charcoal (100 mg) at room temperature
and 1 atmospheric pressure. After 4 h the catalyst was
®ltrated o and the solvent was removed under vac-
uum. The reaction mixture (28 mg) was puri®ed by
TLC prep. on silica gel (eluent E) giving the very un-
stable N-tosyl-cis-4-amino-L-proline (8, 7.0 mg) as
homogeneous compound, which was immediately con-
verted into the corresponding ditosylderivative as fol-
lows: 8 (7 mg) was dissolved in dry pyridine (100 ml)
and the solution was chilled in an ice-bath. A cold sol-
ution of TsCl (28 mg) in dry pyridine (100 ml) was
added and the reaction mixture was left at 08 for 3
days. The oily residue left by the reaction work-up was
puri®ed by prep. TLC (silica gel, eluent F) giving
N 1,N 4-ditosyl-cis-4-amino-L-proline methyl ester (9) as
3.7. N-Tosyl-trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline methyl ester (5)
25
D
5 had: mp 98±1008C; a
102.1 (c 0.5); [Andreatta
20
et al., 1967: mp 103±1048C; a
98.548 (c 1%
D
CHCl3)]; UV lmax ꢀlog e 225 (4.3); IR nmax cm 1: 3515,
1
1741, 1598; H-NMR: d: 7.79 (2H, Ph ), 7.32 (2H, Ph),
0
4.46 (1H, m, H-4), 4.43 (1H, t, J2; 3 J2; 3 8:1 Hz, H-
2), 3.75 (3H, s, OMe), 3.62 (1H, dd, J4, 5 4:1 and
0
0
J5, 5 11:4 Hz, H-5), 3.40 (1H, dt, J4; 5 J3; 5 1:8
0
and J5, 5 11:4 Hz, H-5'), 2.44 (3H, s, MePh), 2.20
(1H, m, H-3), 2.13 (1H, m, H-3'); EIMS, m/z (rel.
int.): 240 [M-CO2Me]+ (49), 155 [Ts]+ (40), 91
[C7H7]+ (100), 58 (55).
homogeneous compound (9.5 mg): a2D5:
10.4 (c
1
3.8. N,O-Ditosyl-trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline methyl ester
(6)
0.12); UV lmax nm ꢀlog e 226 (4.3); IR nmax cm
:
1738, 1598; 1H-NMR: Table 2. EIMS, m/z (rel. int.):
394 [M-COOCH2 (a-lactone)]+ (2), 393 [M-CO2Me]+
(10), 282 [M-TsNH]+ (4), 281 [M-TsNH2]+ (28), 268
[M-CHO-Ts]+ (9), 222 [M-CO2Me-Ts]+ (100), 155
[Ts]+ (81), 92 [M-2 Â TsNH]+ (29), 91 [C7H7]+ (86)
6 had: mp 92±948C; aD25: 49.5 (c 0.5); [Andreatta
20
D
et al., 1967: mp 958C; a
54.88 (c 2% CHCl3)]; UV
lmax nm ꢀlog e 225 (4.3); IR nmax cm 1: 1757, 1598;
1H-NMR, d: 7.72 (2H, Ph), 7.63 (2H, Ph), 7.34 (2H,
Ph), 7.29 (2H, Ph), 5.00 (1H, m, H-4), 4.29 (1H, t, J2; 3
0
J2; 3 7:8 Hz, H-2), 3.75 (3H, s, OMe), 3.69 (1H,
Acknowledgements
0
dd, J4, 5 4:4 and J5, 5 12:3Hz, H-5), 3.58 (1H, dt,
0
0
0
J3; 5 J4; 5 1:9 and J5, 5 12:3 Hz, H-5'), 2.47 (3H,
This investigation was supported in part by grants
to A.E. from the European Project entitled
``Optimizing biological control of a dominant weed in
major crops'' (FAIR5-PL97-3525) and in part by
grants from the Italian Ministry of University and
Scienti®c and Technological Research. The authors
thank the `Centro Interdipartimentale di Metodologie
Chimico-Fisiche, Universita di Napoli Federico II,
Napoli', Italy for NMR spectra and Mr. C. Iodice
(ICMIB-CNR, Arco Felice) for technical assistance.
Mass spectral data were provided by `Servizio di
Spettrometria di Massa del CNR e dell'Universita di
s, MePh), 2.45 (3H, MePh), 2.35 (1H, br ddd,
0
0
J2, 3 7:8, J3, 3 12:3 and J3, 5 1:9 Hz, H-3), 2.20
0
0
0
(1H, ddd, J2, 3 =7.8, J3, 3 12:3 and J3 , 4 5:0 Hz,
H-3'); EIMS, m/z (rel. int.): 394 [M-CO2Me]+ (27),
240 [M-CO2Me-Ts]+ (50), 222 [M-CO2Me-Ts-H2O]+
(98), 155 [Ts]+ (96), 91 [C7H7]+ (100).
3.9. N-Tosyl-cis-4-azido-L-proline methyl ester (7)
7 had: mp 65±688C; aD25: 44.3 (c 0.5); [Andreatta
20
D
et al., 1967: mp 69±708C; a
47.88 (c 2% CHCl3)];