P. Prabhakaran, G. J. Sanjayan / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 1725–1727
1727
and amidinoureas in good yields by reaction with pri-
mary aliphatic amines under various reaction condi-
tions. Further work is in progress to evaluate the
synthetic potential of TBG.
Acknowledgements
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism of reaction of TBG 1 with amines.
P.P. is thankful to the CSIR, New Delhi, for a Research
Fellowship. This work was funded partly by a research
grant from the Department of Biotechnology, New
Delhi.
reaction at elevated temperature and also by the addi-
tion of an external base (DBU). When primary amines
were reacted with TBG 1 under reflux in a 1:1 ratio,
both N-substituted guanidines 12 and amidinoureas 13
were obtained (entries 2 and 6, Table 1). It is noteworthy
that the use of excess amine under reflux dramatically
increased the yield of 13 and amidinoureas were the only
products isolated under these conditions (entries 3, 7, 11,
13 and 15, Table 1). These observations suggest that N-
substituted guanidines 12 are formed first by nucleo-
philic attack of the amines at the highly electrophilic
quaternary carbon of TBG flanked by the three carba-
mate groups. Further reaction of 12, presumably pro-
ceeding through the isocyanate intermediate 14, affords
N-substituted amidinoureas 13 (Scheme 2).
Supplementary data
1
General experimental procedures, H, 13C, DEPT-135
NMR spectra and ESI mass spectra of 12a–e and 13a–e
References and notes
1. (a) Moroder, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3628; (b)
Gierasch, L. M.; Deber, C. M. Biopolymers 2005, 80, 59–
62; (c) Jones, J. J. Peptide Sci. 2005, 11, 245–246.
2. (a) Cai, W.; Kwok, S. W.; Taulane, J. P.; Goodman, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15030–15031; (b) Kinberger,
G. A.; Cai, W.; Goodman, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 15162–15163; (c) Kinberger, G. A.; Taulane, J. P.;
Goodman, M. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 961–963; (d)
Creighton, C. J.; Zapf, C. W.; Bu, J. H.; Goodman, M.
Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1407–1409.
3. Feichtinger, K.; Sings, H. L.; Baker, T. J.; Matthews, K.;
Goodman, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8432–8439.
4. Feichtinger, K.; Zapf, C. S.; Heather, L.; Goodman, M.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3804–3805.
5. Baruah, P. K.; Gonnade, R.; Phalgune, U. D.; Sanjayan,
G. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6461–6467.
6. Prabhakaran, P.; Puranik, V. G.; Sanjayan, G. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 10067–10072.
7. Miel, H.; Rault, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1565–
1568.
8. (a) Yelnosky, J.; Ghulam, M. N. U.S. Patent 4,701,457,
1987. CAN 108: 68973; (b) Studt, W. L.; Zimmerman, H.
K.; Dodson, S. A. Can. CA Pat. 1 210 394 A1, 1986; CAN
107: 12916; (c) Goday, E.; Puigdellivol, L. P. Span. ES
Pat. 550 020 A1, 1986; CAN 106: 66931.
In the presence of the strong base DBU, the reaction of
TBG with isobutylamine in an equimolar ratio under
ambient conditions proceeded with no significant differ-
ence in the yield of substituted guanidine 12 (compare
entries 5 and 8, Table 1). However, raising the reaction
temperature had a minor effect on the product distribu-
tion (compare entries 6 and 9, Table 1). These results
also suggest that the formation of 12 precedes 13 and
that even strong bases like DBU fail to promote TBG
to form isocyanate intermediate 8, which would have
led to the formation of 9 (Scheme 1). The difference in
the reaction when compared with di-Boc guanidine
may be due to the increased electrophilicity at the qua-
ternary carbon of the guanidine moiety due to the addi-
tional Boc group. In order to understand the reaction
pattern of aromatic amines, TBG was reacted with ani-
line (entry 16, Table 1). However, this reaction led to the
formation of an intractable mixture of products. A
similar outcome also occurred using a secondary amine
(entry 17, Table 1). Finally, in an effort to react TBG
with amines to afford 11, which could have been cyclo-
condensed to furnish the self-assembling system 4,
TBG was reacted with excess benzylamine in the pres-
ence of trimethyl aluminium (TMA). However, this
reaction led to the formation of a mixture N-substituted
guanidine and amidinourea (entry 4, Table 1).
9. Chenguang, Y.; Williams, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 11777–11784.
10. Juyal, P.; Anand, O. N. Fuel 2003, 82, 97–103.
11. Tilley, J. W.; Blount, J. F. Helv. Chem. Acta 1980, 63, 841–
859.
12. Tilley, J. W.; Blount, J. F. Helv. Chem. Acta 1980, 63, 832–
840.
In conclusion, this work demonstrates that TBG reacts
in an unusual manner with amines under various condi-
tions, in stark contrast to the manner by which di-Boc
guanidine 5 reacts. Our finding suggest that TBG can
act as an excellent, readily available starting material
for the selective synthesis of both N-alkyl guanidines
13. Torok, S.; Nagy, B.; Pribek, F.; Balogh, S. Appl. WO
8807990 A1, 1988, CAN 110: 114462.
14. Wagenaar, F. L.; Kerwin, J. F., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
4331–4338.
15. Chnguang, Y.; Williams, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 1945–1948.