Mixed-Valence Polyferrocenium Cations
Organometallics, Vol. 17, No. 15, 1998 3329
Ta ble 5. P h ysica l P r op er ties of Va r iou s F er r ocen es
MS (M+
at m/z)
compd
1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm)
mp
18
19
23
24
25
27
28
29
1.45 (d, 3H, -CH3), 2.01 (d, 1H, -OH), 4.12 (t, 2H, Cp), 4.22 (m, 4H, Cp), 4.42 (m, 2H, Cp),
4.66 (m, 1H, -CH)
308, 310
336, 338
610
0.93 (t, 3H, -CH3), 1.46 (m, 2H, -CH2-), 1.64 (m, 2H, -CH2-), 2.06 (s, 1H, -OH), 4.13 (s, 2H, Cp),
4.22 (m, 4H, Cp), 4.42 (m, 3H, Cp, -CH)
1.02 (t, 6H, -CH3), 2.11 (q, 4H, -CH2-), 3.81 (d, 4H, Cp), 3.83 (d, 4H, Cp), 4.02 (t, 4H, Cp),
4.07 (t, 4H, Cp), 4.10 (t, 4H, Cp), 4.16 (t, 4H, Cp)
0.84 (t, 6H, -CH3), 1.26 (m, 8H, -CH2-), 2.06 (t, 6H, -CH2-), 3.80 (d, 4H, Cp), 3.83 (t, 4H, Cp),
4.02 (t, 4H, Cp), 4.07 (t, 4H, Cp), 4.09 (t, 4H, Cp), 4.15 (t, 4H, Cp)
3.18 (s, 6H, -OCH3), 3.91 (s, 4H, -CH2-), 3.95 (d, 8H, Cp), 4.04 (d, 8H, Cp), 4.11 (s, 4H, Cp),
4.17 (s, 4H, Cp)
1.00 (t, 6H, -CH3), 2.09 (q, 4H, -CH2-), 3.79 (s, 4H, Cp), 3.80 (s, 4H, Cp), 3.98 (s, 12H, Cp),
4.03 (s, 4H, Cp), 4.07 (s, 4H, Cp), 4.11 (s, 4H, Cp)
0.82 (t, 6H, -CH3), 1.25 (m, 8H, -CH2CH2-), 2.03 (t, 4H, -CH2-), 3.77 (s, 4H, Cp),
3.79 (s, 4H, Cp), 3.97 (s, 12H, Cp), 4.01 (s, 4H, Cp), 4.04 (s, 4H, Cp), 4.09 (s, 4H, Cp)
3.17 9s, 6H, -OCH3), 3.89 (s, 4H, -CH2-), 3.92 (s, 4H, Cp), 3.94 (s, 8H, Cp), 3.97 (s, 4H, Cp),
3.98 (s, 4H, Cp), 4.01 (s, 4H, Cp), 4.08 (s, 4H, Cp), 4.13 (s, 4H, Cp)
102-103
100-101
136-137
110-112
162-163
157-158
666
642
794
850
826
desired compound (89% yield for 18 and 86% yield for 19). The
physical properties are shown in Table 5.
vironments and this asymmetry results in a zero-point
energy difference for intramolecular electron transfer.
In other words, one vibronic state of the mixed-valence
cation is energeically more stable than the other state.
This explains why a delocalized electronic structure for
an asymmetic biferrocenium cation has not been ob-
served.
As mentioned in the Introduction, the symmetric
mixed-valence compounds 13-16 have a delocalized
electronic structure at 300 K. However, the 300 K
Mo¨ssbauer spectra of 2-7 indicate the presence of a
localized electronic structure. Here, we suggest that the
most important factor in controlling the electron trans-
fer in 2-7 is the presence of the zero-point energy dif-
ference (Eo). As shown in Figure 3, the electron-transfer
products in mixed-valence cations 2-7 are energetically
unfavorable oxidation-state isomers. For example, there
are actually two equivalent unfavorable oxidation-state
isomers for mixed-valence triferrocenium dications.
Thus, one vibronic state of the mixed-valence dication
is energetically more stable than the other state. This
explains why a localized electronic structure for 2-7
was observed.
Red u ction of 18 a n d 19. The reduction reaction was
carried out by carefully adding, with stirring, a small portion
of AlCl3 to a mixture of ferrocene compound and LiAlH4 in
dry ether. After 30 min, the solution became yellow, an excess
of H2O was added to it, and the ether layer was separated.
The ether layer was washed with H2O and dried over MgSO4.
After evaporation of the solvent, the crude product was
chromatographed on Al2O3, eluting with hexane. The first
band was the desired compound (∼95% yield). These com-
pounds were identical by 1H NMR with those prepared by a
different procedure.14,21
Gen er a l Ullm a n Cou p lin g Rea ction of 20-22 w ith 17.
A mixture of the corresponding bromoferrocene (6.48 mmol),
17 (3.24 mmol), and activated Cu (10 g) was heated under N2
at 125 °C (oil bath) for 24 h. The reaction mixture was cooled
to room temperature and then subjected to the Soxhlet process
with dichloromethane. The extract was evaporated at reduced
pressure, and the residue was chromatographed on Al2O3.
Compound 23 was obtained by a cross-coupling reaction of
17 and 20. The crude product was chromatographed, eluting
with hexane. The first band was a mixture of ferrocene and
ethylferrocene. The second band was 1′,1′′′-diethylbiferrocene,
which was identical by 1H NMR with that prepared by a
different procedure.21 Continued elution with hexane:CH2Cl2
(20:1) gave the desired compound 23 (15% yield).
Exp er im en ta l Section
Compound 24 was obtained by a cross-coupling reaction of
17 and 21. The purification was carried out by following the
same procedure as described for 23.
Gen er a l In for m a tion . All manipulations involving air-
sensitive materials were carried out using standard Schlenk
techniques under an atmosphere of N2. Chromatography was
performed on neutral alumina (Merck, activity II). Solvents
were dried as follows: benzene, hexane, ether, and THF
distilled from Na/benzophenone; CH2Cl2 and (CH3)2S2 distilled
from CaH2. Samples of 1,1′-dibromoferrocene, 22, and 26 were
prepared according to the literature procedure.5,20
Syn th eses of 18 a n d 19. Dibromoferrocene (17, 8.88 g,
20 mmol) was placed in a freshly oven-dried three-necked flask
(500 mL) and dried under vacuum at 2 mmHg at 25 °C for 4
h. Dried THF (80 mL), followed by n-butyllithium (20 mmol),
was added under nitrogen. The resulting solution was stirred
at -30 °C for 30 min, during which 1-bromo-1′-lithioferrocene
gradually precipitated. Acetaldehyde (20 mmol) or butyral-
dehyde (20 mmol) was then added, and the solution was stirred
further at -30 °C for 30 min. Water (200 mL) was added,
and the mixture was then extracted with CH2Cl2. The
combined extracts were dried over MgSO4 and evaporated at
reduced pressure. The residue was chromatographed on Al2O3.
The first band eluted with hexane was ferrocenes. Continued
elution with hexane:CH2Cl2 (1:1) gave elutes which yielded the
Compound 25 was obtained from 17 and 22. The crude
product was chromatographed, eluting with hexane. The first
band was a mixture of ferrocenes. The second band eluted
with hexane/ethyl acetate (50/1) was methoxymethylferrocene.
Continued elution with hexane/ethyl acetate (100/7) gave
1′,1′′′-dimethoxymethylbiferrocene (third band) and compound
25 (fourth band, 12.5% yield).
Gen er a l Ullm a n Cou p lin g Rea ction of 20-22 w ith 26.
The coupling reaction was carried out according to the general
procedure described above, except using compound 26 instead
of 17.
Compound 27 was obtained by a cross-coupling reaction of
20 with 26. The crude product was chromatographed, eluting
with hexane. The first band was a mixture of ferrocenes. The
second band was 1′,1′′′-diethylbiferrocene, which was identical
by 1H NMR with that prepared by a different procedure.21
Continued elution with hexane:benzene (1:1) gave the desired
compound 27 (14% yield).
(21) Iijima, S.; Saida, R.; Motoyama, I.; Sano, H. Bull. Chem. Soc.
J pn. 1981, 54, 1375.
(20) Dong, T.-Y.; Lai, L. L. J . Organomet. Chem. 1996, 509, 131.