7746 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 120, No. 31, 1998
Horner et al.
sequence, the relatively slow step that one assumes is reaction
of the stannyl radical with the amide derivative, was quite rapid.
The internal consistency of the kinetics of cyclization of radicals
20 and 21, determined via tin hydride trapping using N-
(phenylthio)amide precursors, with the cyclization kinetics
measured by LFP in this work further indicates that the reactions
were uncomplicated.
N-acyl PTOC carbamate 5A, but we believe the rate constant
we obtained is reasonably reliable.
The potential translocation reaction in the amidylacyloxyl
radical precursor to radical 5 is demonstrably insignificant. If
it occurred, then this unimolecular process, which competes with
unimolecular decarboxylation, would have introduced a constant
amount of unrearranged amide product irrespective of PhSH
concentration. The manifestations of this phenomenon would
be (1) the individual values of (kT/kC) calculated for each
concentration of PhSH would differ and (2) a plot of the ratio
of unrearranged to rearranged products versus PhSH concentra-
tion would have a nonzero intercept reflecting the amount of
translocation. In fact, the individual values of (kT/kC) at all
concentrations of PhSH agree (Table 3), and the least-squares
fit of that data has an intercept of (0.0 ( 0.2) M at 2σ. Any
translocation that occurred would introduce a percentage error
in (kT/kC) equal to the percentage of translocation, that is, 20%
translocation would give a 20% error in the ratio and in the
calculated value of kT. However, for the data in Table 3 with
a slope of (kT/kC) ) 7.5 M, 20% translocation would give an
intercept of 0.25 M which is outside the 95% confidence interval
for the intercept we measured.
The potential for reaction of the amidylacyloxyl radical from
5A with PhSH before decarboxylation is more difficult to
evaluate. The rate constant for decarboxylation of the amidy-
lacyloxyl radicals must be greater than 2 × 108 s-1 at ambient
temperature because the cyclizations of radicals 1 and 4 were
found to occur faster than this, and we estimated that the rate
constant is in the 109-1010 s-1 range at room temperature. It is
known that PhSH at up to 2 M concentrations does not react
with alkylacyloxyl radicals faster than decarboxylation,36 which
occurs with rate constants in the 1010-1011 s-1 range. If one
assumes that PhSH reacts with these two types of acyloxyl
radicals with about the same rate constants, then PhSH trapping
of the amidylacyloxyl radicals would not be a major reaction
in the studies conducted here where the PhSH concentrations
were 0.1-0.5 M. Nevertheless, we caution that the rate constant
for reaction of PhSH with an amidyl radical should be
considered as an upper limit.
The reaction of Bu3SnH with amidyl radical 2 was very fast,
indicative of the high exothermicity of the reaction. The bond
dissociation energy (BDE) of the N-H bond in a secondary
amide is comparable to the N-H BDE of ammonia31 or about
107 kcal/mol, whereas an R3Sn-H BDE is only about 74 kcal/
mol.32 In addition, an electrophilic character of the radical, or
at least a lack of nucleophilic character, is suggested by the
fact that the reaction with tin hydride is about 3 orders of
magnitude faster than reaction of a primary alkyl radical with
Bu3SnH.33 Specifically, the ∆G° values for tin hydride reacting
with an amidyl radical (-34 kcal/mol) and with an alkyl radical
(-26 kcal/mol)32 are large enough such that the transition states
should be quite early, yet ∆Gq for the amidyl radical reaction
is about 4 kcal/mol smaller than that for the alkyl radical
reaction, suggesting polar stabilization in the transition state for
the amidyl radical reaction. That the amidyl radical reaction
with thiophenol is slower than reaction with Bu3SnH, whereas
a nucleophilic carbon radical reacts with PhSH more rapidly34
than it reacts with Bu3SnH,33 further indicates the electrophilic
character of an amidyl radical.
The studies of thiophenol trapping were considerably more
complicated than the tin hydride studies. In a manner similar
to alkyl halides and pseudohalides, the N-(phenylthio)amides
will not react with thiyl radicals in chain propagation steps. In
studies of carbon-centered radicals reacting with thiols or
benzeneselenol, it is possible to use a silane or tin hydride as a
sacrificial reductant which reacts with the chalcogen-centered
radical to give a Group 14 radical that will propagate a chain
reaction with an alkyl halide,35 but this approach is impractical
for amidyl radicals which react more rapidly with tin hydride
than with a thiol. The N-acyl PTOC carbamates and PTOC
imidate esters do react in chain propagation steps with thiyl
radicals, but problems exist in the applications of either of these
types of precursors for indirect studies. The more robust N-acyl
PTOC carbamates present the potential problems that the first-
formed amidylacyloxyl radicals 18 could react with the donor
intermolecularly or by intramolecular translocation to give an
R-amide radical; both processes will introduce an error by
leading ultimately to an unrearranged amide product. The
PTOC imidate esters do not have this potential problem, but
these compounds cannot be purified readily nor handled without
some hydrolysis which, again, gives the unrearranged amide
product and will introduce an error in the kinetics. Further, in
an attempt to use a PTOC imidate ester in a competition kinetic
study with a thiol, it appeared as if the activated acyl precursor
reacted with the thiol by a polar addition reaction. The kinetic
study of the reaction of thiophenol with radical 5 employed the
Conclusion
Rate constants for amidyl reactions measured directly by LFP
methods provide the absolute kinetic values necessary for
establishing an amidyl radical kinetic scale. These have been
incorporated into rate constants for bimolecular reactions of
amidyl radicals and cyclizations of simple amidyl radicals to
give kinetic values that can be used in synthetic planning or
for timing other amidyl radical reactions. Cyclizations of amidyl
radicals are much faster than those of carbon-centered radicals,
indicating that 5-exo cyclizations leading to either N-acylpyr-
rolidine or γ-butyrolactam products and 6-exo cyclizations
leading to δ-valerolactam products can be incorporated into
synthetic schemes, but 6-exo cyclizations that ultimately give
N-acylpiperidine products are slow relative to competing 1,5-
hydrogen atom transfer reactions. The development of nitrogen-
centered radical kinetic scales has been an objective of our group
for some time, and Table 4 contains an overview of the kinetic
results from this work and previously reported studies.16,20,37
(31) Bordwell, F. G.; Harrelson, J. A.; Lynch, T. Y. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 3337-3341.
(32) Griller, D.; Kanabus-Kaminska, J. M.; Maccoll, A. THEOCHEM
1988, 40, 125-131.
(33) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Ingold, K. U.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1981, 103, 7739-7742.
Experimental Section
(34) Franz, J. A.; Bushaw, B. A.; Alnajjar, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 268-275.
General Methods. Commercially available reagents were purchased
from either Sigma or Aldrich Chemical Co. and were used as received.
Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and diethyl ether were distilled under a nitrogen
(35) Allen, R. P.; Roberts, B. P.; Willis, C. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1989, 1387-1388. Crich, D.; Yao, Q. W. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 84-88. Crich, D.; Jiao, X. Y.; Yao, Q. W.; Harwood: J. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 2368-2373.
(36) Newcomb, M.; Johnson, C. C.; Manek, M. B.; Varick, T. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10915-10921.