D. C. Blakemore et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 248–251
249
not chiral but introduction of the stereogenic quaternary centre
carrying the aminomethyl group must be controlled (by making
use of the steric impact of the two cis-dimethyl groups).
A number of different methods were utilised to synthesise the
starting cyclopentanones. The synthesis of 3,4-trans-dimethyl
cyclopentanone (14), is detailed in Scheme 1.
An alternative approach towards the 3,4-trans-cyclopentanones
made use of 3-acetoxy cyclopent-2-en-1-one. Conjugate addition
of an alkyl Grignard reagent to the acetoxy-cyclopentenone17–19
(made with enantiomeric excess of >99%) followed by elimination
and a further conjugate addition gave the 3,4-trans-dialkyl cyclo-
pentanone without loss of stereochemical integrity (Scheme 2).
For example, conjugate addition of the n-propyl zincate (gener-
ated from n-propyl magnesium chloride and dimethylzinc)
occurred exclusively on the least hindered face of the
cyclopentenone (the acetoxy group forcing the n-propyl group
onto the opposite face) to generate propyl cyclopentanone (15).
Low temperature elimination with DBU followed by conjugate
addition of the methyl zincate occurred without any epimerisation
to give the 3,4-dialkyl cyclopentanone (17) in >98% enantiomeric
excess (as determined by chiral GC).
Fumaryl chloride (5) was converted to the diester (6) by reac-
tion with (À)-menthol in good yield. The ratio of diastereoisomers
of (7) obtained in the Diels–Alder reaction with butadiene varied
according to the choice of Lewis acid with the auxiliary setting
the facial selectivity.13–15 Diethylaluminium chloride at À60 °C
gave an excellent ratio of diastereoisomers (9:1), with diisobutylal-
uminium chloride giving an even better ratio (94:6) (as measured
by 1H NMR).16 Titanium tetrachloride at À10 °C gave a poorer dia-
stereoselectivity (83:17) but was the preferred Lewis acid for this
reaction because of its ease of handling in large scale (>1 mol) reac-
tions. Attempts to increase the diastereoselectivity by lowering the
reaction temperature were unsuccessful as the dienophile–TiCl4
complex would precipitate from solution. The lower diastereose-
lectivity did not prove to be a hindrance, as the diol (8) is highly
crystalline. Therefore, reduction of diester (7) with lithium alumin-
ium hydride afforded diol (8) as a 83:17 mixture of enantiomers
which could be recrystallised to give the (3S,4S)-diol as a single
enantiomer (the optical purity was confirmed by chiral HPLC and
chiral GC at >99.5%). The diol was then mesylated and reduced
with lithium aluminium hydride/NaH to give the volatile (bp
110 °C) alkene (10). The alkene was oxidatively cleaved with
KMnO4 under phase transfer conditions to give diacid (11) as a
white solid. This was then esterified and a Dieckmann cyclisation
with potassium tert-butoxide gave cyclopentanone ester (13).
Hydrolysis and decarboxylation was carried out using water in
DMSO to give the desired (3S,4S)-3,4-dimethyl cyclopentanone
(14). The optical integrity was confirmed by chiral GC. The pure
(3R,4R)-3,4-dimethyl cyclopentanone could be produced in a sim-
ilar manner by utilising (+)-menthol as the chiral auxiliary. The
3,4-cis-dimethyl cyclopentanone was also synthesised in a similar
manner starting from the Diels–Alder adduct, cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydr-
ophthalic anhydride.
Conversion of the ketones through to the gababutin analogues
is detailed in Scheme 3. Ketone (14) was converted to a,b-unsatu-
rated ester (18) via a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction. Sub-
sequent nitromethane anion addition gave the nitroester (19).
Hydrogenation to the lactam (20) and then acid hydrolysis gave
the final amino acid (21).
For 3,4-cis-dimethyl cyclopentanone, two possible diastereoiso-
mers of the final gababutin are possible and control of the stereo-
chemistry was obtained by making use of the steric impact of the
two methyl groups.
For synthesis of (28),
a nitroalkene route was employed
(Scheme 4). Here, ketone (22) was reacted with the dianion of
nitromethane utilising 2 equiv of butyl lithium to generate alcohol
(23). Acetylation and base-catalysed elimination gave the nitroalk-
ene (25). Low temperature conjugate addition of the ethyl acetate
anion gave nitro ester (26) as a 9:1 mixture of diastereoisomers,
addition occurring from the face opposite to the two methyl groups
O
O
O
(i)
(ii)
AcO
AcO
(15)
(16)
(iii)
O
CO2R*
CO2R*
COCl
COR*
(i)
(ii)
ClOC
R*OC
(17)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(iii)
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) n-PrMgCl, Me2Zn, THF, À78 °C; (ii) DBU,
Et2O, À40 °C (68% over two steps); (iii) MeMgCl, Me2Zn, THF, À78 °C (63%).
(v)
(iv)
OMs
OMs
OH
OH
(10)
(9)
(8)
CO2Et
(vi)
NO2 CO2Et
O
(i)
(ii)
MeO2C
O
(viii)
(vii)
HO2C
HO2C
MeO2C
MeO2C
(14)
(18)
(19)
(iii)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(ix)
O
R* =
H
N
O
O
NH2 CO2H
(iv)
(14)
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) (À)-menthol, pyridine, CH2Cl2; (ii) buta-
diene, TiCl4, toluene, À10 °C (100% yield, 65% de) or butadiene, Et2AlCl, toluene,
À60 °C (64% yield, 95% de); (iii) LiAlH4, THF; recrystallisation from acetone; (iv)
pyridine, MsCl, 0 °C, 18h (82%); (v) LiAlH4, diethyl ether, 40 °C, 2h (98%); (vi)
KMnO4, nBu4NBr, H2O–CH2Cl2, rt, 18h; then SO2, 0 °C (82%); (vii) methanol, cH2SO4,
rt, 18h (90%) (viii) KOtBu, THF, 75 °C, 3h (100%); (ix) DMSO, H2O, 140 °C, 4 h (86%).
(21)
(20)
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (i) triethylphosphonoacetate, NaH, THF, 0 °C
to rt (95%); (ii) MeNO2, TBAF, THF, reflux (65%); (iii) H2, Ni, MeOH; (iv) 6 N HCl, 1,4-
dioxane, reflux (69% from nitroester).