On the efficacy of propeller-shaped, C3-symmetric triarylphosphines in
asymmetric catalysis
Mark T. Powell, Alexander M. Porte and Kevin Burgess*
Department of Chemistry, Texas A & M University, PO Box 300012, College Station, TX 77842-3012, USA.
E-mail: burgess@chemvx.tamu.edu
O
OH
R1
Ligand sets 1 and 2 were prepared and examined for
evidence of C3-symmetric propeller-shaped conformations
Br
Br
Me
Me
in solution, and for their ability to induce enantioselectivity
in an allylation reaction.
i
R1
3
There are conflicting arguments with regard to the potential of
optically pure, C3-symmetric triarylphosphines in asymmetric
syntheses. Some researchers may correctly point to the value of
C2-ligands1 and claim that application of C3-ligands is a logical
extrapolation of the field. C3-Symmetric arrangements of three
aromatic groups around a central atom can adopt stable
enantiomeric propeller-shaped conformations that might pro-
vide chiral pockets to facilitate enantiodiscrimination.2 How-
ever, the contrary argument is also convincing. Asymmetric
induction cannot increase indefinitely with the symmetry of the
chiral directing group because a perfectly spherical object
would be useless for inducing a chiral environment.
ii
OR2
OR2
Me
P
Br
Me
iii, iv
R1
3
R1
4
1 R1 = H; 2 R1 = OMe
a R2 = Me; b R2 = Ph;
c R2 = 2,6-Me2C6H3
Experimentally, the value of optically active, propeller-
shaped, C3-symmetric phosphines is hard to assess. This is
because of synthetic difficulties associated with obtaining the
requisite ligands, and due to a lack of techniques to recognize
rigid propeller conformations in solution. Sharpless and co-
workers, for instance, prepared triarylphosphine cage structures
(an example is shown below) by relatively difficult synthetic
routes.3,4 They then found that in an optically active complex,
this ligand stereomutates between enantiomeric propeller-
shaped conformations at room temperature. This ligand design
therefore did not facilitate a test of the efficacy of propeller-
shaped C3-symmetric ligands, hence their value remained
questionable. The work described in this manuscript deals with
attempts to address this issue using phosphines 1 and 2. The
tenet of this project is that a chiral substituent on the aromatic
rings could be easily installed, and may lead to stable
C3-symmetric propeller-shaped aryl arrays in the ligand.
Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: i, BH3·SMe2, 5 mol% 4,5,6,7-tetra-
hydro-1-methyl-3,3-diphenyl-1H,3H-pyrrolo[1,2]-[1,3,2]oxazaborolebor-
ane (CBS),8 CH2Cl2, 225 °C, 12 h (94% and 96.2% ee for 1; 85%, 99% ee
for 2); ii, alkylation (yields range from 70 to 99%, e.g. MeI, NaH, DMF for
1a); iii, BuLi, Et2O, 230 °C, 1 h; iv, PCl3, Et2O, 230 to 25 °C (yields
typically 30–50% for steps iii and iv)
t
Scheme 1 outlines the route by which the ligand set 1a–1c
(and later 2a–2c) was obtained. The route diverges from the
common chiral alcohol intermediate 3 hence this strategy is
more efficient than ones that rely on different starting materials
for each phosphine prepared.
Evidence for preferred stereoisomeric propeller-shaped con-
formations in solution is hard to obtain. Crystallographic studies
of derivatives such as complex 5a (Fig. 1) indicated the desired
conformations exist in the solid state, but these observations can
give no indication of their dynamic behavior in solution.
Consequently, a set of circular dichroism (CD) spectra was
recorded to elucidate solution state conformations. Chiral
ordering of the aromatic groups should be accompanied by
Fig. 1 Comparison of normalized ellipticities (i.e. ellipticities per mole of
aromatic ring) for compounds 4a, 5a and 6a
Chem. Commun., 1998
2161