Please do not adjust margins
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Page 4 of 6
ARTICLE
Journal Name
There are no conflicts to declare.
tetrafluoro-4-propylthiophenyl)sulfane (5a, 38%). When 2-((4-
chlorophenyl)disulfanyl)pyridine 4b was applied in this
reaction, only 3l was received in 43% yield. Methyl 2-methyl-3-
furyl disulphide (4c) could react with under the optimal
DOI: 10.1039/C7OB02836A
(
)
Acknowledgements
2
conditions, generating 3a in 21% yield and 3f in 36% yield.
Several experiments were conducted to investigate the
mechanism of this process. 1). A DMF solution of sodium
We are grateful to the National Science Foundation of China
(21602188), the Education Department of Hunan Province
(17C1524) and Xiangtan University (15QDZ52) for financial
support of this work.
thiophenolate (6a) or 4-methylbenzenethiol sodium (6b) and
2
(1 : 1) were stirred overnight, generating 1-phenylthio-2,3,5,6-
tetrafluorobenzene (7a, 65% yield) or 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-1-(p-
tolylthio)benzene (7b, 40% yield) as the major product (Scheme
Notes and references
3); 2).
condition, giving corresponding products
(Table 4). As shown in Table 4, 7a could react with series of
1a 1c 1h and 1o) to yield 5b (40%), 5c (34%), 5d (56%) and 5e
7
could react with various disulfides under the optimal
1. (a) B. M. Trost, Chem. Rev., 1978, 78, 363-382; (b) M. D.
McReynolds, J. M. Dougherty and P. R. Hanson, Chem. Rev.,
2004, 104, 2239-2258; (c) M. Matsugi, K. Murata, H. Nambu
and Y. Kita, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 1077-1080; (d) C. J.
Yu, Y. Chong, J. F. Kayyem and M. Gozin, J. Org. Chem., 1999,
64, 2070-2079; (e) K. Müller, C. Faeh and F. Diederich,
Science, 2007, 317, 1881-1886; (f) S. Purser, P. R. Moore, S.
Swallow and V. Gouverneur, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 320-
330.
2. (a) M. Müller, C. M. Orben, N. Schützenmeister, M. Schmidt,
A. Leonov, U. M. Reinscheid, B. Dittrich and C. Griesinger,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 6047-6049; (b) J. Wang, M.
Sánchez-Roselló, J. L. Aceña, C. del Pozo, A. E. Sorochinsky, S.
5
in moderate yields
1
(
,
,
(57%) in the presence of KOH (Table 4, entries 1 ~ 4). Similarly,
5f (39%), 5g (32%), 5d (52%) and 5h (51%) could be prepared
from 7b and corresponding disulfides (1a
the optimal conditions; 3). Employment of excess
gave product 1,2,4-tris(phenylthio)-3,6-difluorobenzene (
74% yield (Scheme 4); 4). As mentioned above, the reaction of
1k 1l and only gave 3k and 3l in low yields. These results
indicated that sulfhydryl anion could substitute the fluorine
atom at the C-4 position of , and the hydrogen of could be
extracted by KOH. However, the shedding of fluorine at the C-4
position of was also easier than that hydrogen.
Based on the above preliminary results,
,
1c
,
1g and 1o) under
with only
) in
4
2
8
,
2
Fustero, V. A. Soloshonok and H. Liu, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114
2432-2506.
,
2
2
3. (a) J.-P. Bégué and D. Bonnet-Delpon, J. Fluorine Chem.,
2006, 127, 992-1012; (b) C. Isanbor and D. O’Hagan, J.
Fluorine Chem., 2006, 127, 303-319; (c) D. Karl and M.
2
a
plausible
Muhammad, Curr. Top. Med. Chem., 2003, 3, 249-282; (d)
mechanism was proposed in Scheme 4. As reported by Kisliuk,
Taddei and other people, base could help activating the
disulfide via homolytic cleavage.11 Initially, reactive sulfhydryl
ion intermediates were generated from disulfides in the
presence of base. The reactive sulfhydryl ion then reacted with
K. L. Kirk, J. Fluorine Chem., 2006, 127, 1013-1029; (e) R.
Laszlo, K. A. Menzel, K. Bentz, B. Schreiner, K. Kettering, C.
Eick and J. Schreieck, Life Sci., 2010, 87, 507-513; (f) D. T.
Wong, F. P. Bymaster and E. A. Engleman, Life Sci., 1995,
57, 411-441.
the C-F bond at C-4 position of
2 to provide intermediate A.
4. (a) E. Sauvage, F. Kerff, M. Terrak, J. A. Ayala and P. Charlier,
FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 2008, 32, 234-258. (b) M. Tomizawa
and J. E. Casida, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 2003, 48, 339-364; (c)
P. Jeschke, R. Nauen, M. Schindler and A. Elbert, J. Agric.
Food. Chem., 2011, 59, 2897-2908.
5. C.-P. Yang, Y.-Y. Su and M.-Y. Hsu, Polym. J, 2006, 38, 132-
144.
6. M. Arisawa, T. Suzuki, T. Ishikawa and M. Yamaguchi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12214-12215.
7. M. Arisawa, T. Yamada and M. Yamaguchi, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2010, 51, 6090-6092.
Then the C-H bond would be broken in the presence of base,
followed by reaction with reactive sulfhydryl ion intermediates
B
or other disulfides to give corresponding products C or D.
However, employment of excess base would destroy more
disulfides at the beginning of the reaction, thus leading to the
break of more C-F bonds of pentafluorobenzene in the first step
and the formation of multi-substituted products. This would
limit the second step, resulting in a decrease in the yield of
desired products.
8. C. Yu, C. Zhang and X. Shi, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 2012
,
1953-1959.
Conclusions
9. C. Yu, G. Hu, C. Zhang, R. Wu, H. Ye, G. Yang and X. Shi, J.
Fluorine Chem., 2013, 153, 33-38.
10. M. Li and J. M. Hoover, Chem Commun (Camb), 2016, 52
In conclusion, the thiolation of pentafluorobenzene with
disulfides by C–H, C–F bonds activation and C-S bond formation
was demonstrated. This is a new and environment-friendly
methodology of thiolation reaction. The reaction proceeds
under mild and metal-free conditions, and the corresponding
products were obtained in moderate to good yields. A possible
mechanism for the reaction was given through some
experiments.
,
8733-8736.
11. (a) A. Gangjee, R. Devraj, J. J. McGuire and R. L. Kisliuk, J.
Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 4495-4502; (b) S. Antonello, R.
Benassi, G. Gavioli, F. Taddei and F. Maran, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 7529-7538; (c) C. M. Wright, P. M.
Palenchar and E. G. Mueller, Chem. Commun., 2002, DOI:
10.1039/B208626C, 2708-2709; (d) N. Taniguchi, The
Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2006, 71, 7874-7876; (e) Q.
Zhou, B. Zhang, H. Gu, A. Zhong, T. Du, Q Zhou, Y. Ye, Z. Jin,
Conflicts of interest
H. Jiang and R. Chen, Lett. Org. Chem. 2012, 9, 175-181. (f)
K. Moriya, D. Didier, M. Simon, J. M. Hammann, G. Berionni,
4 | J. Name., 2017, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins