4 and 6 and significantly red-shifted CT transition (∼70 nm)
for the EDA complex of the rigid cyclophane-like donor 5
clearly implies that there is little or no contribution of the
π-stacked (cofacial) conformer of the bichromophoric 4 in
solution. As such, this conclusion is further supported by
the fact that the UV-vis absorption spectrum of bichro-
mophoric 4 was found to be characteristically similar (λmax
) 286 ( 1 nm) to that of the model monochromophoric 6,
whereas the cyclophane-like donor 5 showed an additional
band at 305 nm (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Informa-
tion).
when compared to the monochromophoric donor 6 (Eox
1.22 V) by ∼260 mV.13
)
As such, the through-space electronic coupling between
the cofacially stacked aryl moieties can also be seen in the
electronic spectra of their cation radicals, where characteristic
charge-resonance transitions in the near-IR region are ob-
served.13,14 Accordingly, we generated the cation radicals
of 4-6 using stable cation-radical salts [such as CRET+•,
Ered ) 1.14 V vs SCE and NAP+•, Ered ) 1.34 V vs SCE]15,16
as one-electron aromatic oxidants in dichloromethane as
follows.
For example, a treatment of the orange-red solution of
CRET+• (λmax ) 518 nm, ꢀ518 ) 7300 M-1 cm-1)15 with
substoichiometric increments of 4 led to the disappearance
of the absorption bands due to CRET+•, and a concomitant
growth of a new band at 466 nm together with a broad
featureless absorption band centered at ∼1224 nm (Figure
2A). Addition of donor 4 beyond one equivalent showed no
The cyclic and square-wave voltammograms of 4, 5, and
6 recorded in dichloromethane are compiled in Figure 1B/
C. The bichromophoric donors 4 and 5 showed two reversible
oxidation waves at the potentials of 0.96, 1.22 V and 0.87,
1.22 V vs SCE, respectively, whereas the monochromophoric
model donor 6 showed only one reversible oxidation wave
at a potential of 1.22 V vs SCE. The observation of two
well-separated one-electron oxidation waves (∆E ) 350 mV)
for cyclophane-like 5, in Figure 1B/C, is consistent with the
fact that the removal of the first electron results in a cation
radical (5+•) where the cationic charge is delocalized over
both the (preorganized) cofacial veratrole moieties, and
thereby rendering the ejection of the second electron difficult
by roughly ∼350 mV. Interestingly, however, the observation
of two similar well-separated one-electron oxidation waves
(∆E ) 260 mV) in conformationally mobile 4 suggests that
upon removal of the first electron, the extended (noncofacial)
conformer of 4+• undergoes an instantaneous transformation
into the π-stacked conformer on the electrochemical time
scale (see Scheme 2) and thereby rendering the second
Figure 2
.
(A) Spectra obtained upon the reduction of 1.5 × 10-4
M CRET+• (red) in CH2Cl2 by an incremental addition of 5.4 ×
10-3 M 4. (B) Plot of increase of absorbance of 4•+ (at 1224 nm)
and decrease of absorbance CRET+• (at 518 nm) against the
equivalent of added 4 in A. (C) Overlay of the absorption spectra
of the 4+•, 5+•, and model 6+• (λmax ) 442 nm; ꢀ442 ) 5,400 M-1
cm-1) in CH2Cl2 at 22 °C.
Scheme 2
.
Mechanism of Redox-Controlled Electromechanical
Actuation
additional spectral changes (Figure 2B). Also, Figure 2C
shows that the electronic spectra of 4+• (λmax ) 466, 1224
nm; ꢀ1220 ) 6,990 M-1 cm-1) is indistinguishable with that
of the rigid cyclophane-like 5+• (λmax ) 464, 1218 nm; ꢀ1220
) 7,170 M-1 cm-1). Moreover, the observation of a highly
characteristic charge-resonance transition at ∼1220 nm in
both 4+• and 5+•, and its singular absence in the monochro-
mophoric 6+• (Figure 2C), further suggests that 4+• adapts a
cofacial conformation similar to that of rigid 5+•.
oxidation to occur at a potential (Eox2 ≈ 1.22 V) strikingly
similar to that of 5.
To obtain definitive X-ray crystallographic evidence for
the transformation of the extended cation radical E-4+• into
the cofacially stacked C-4+• in Scheme 2, the single crystals
The observed difference (∼90 mV) in the first oxidation
potentials of conformationally mobile 4 when compared to
the rigid π-stacked 5 can be attributed to the energy required
for the transformation of the extended conformation E-4 into
the cofacially stacked C-4 conformation (see Scheme 2).
-
of the highly robust 4+• SbCl6 were obtained by a slow
diffusion of toluene into its dichloromethane solution during
(13) Compare: Rathore, R.; Chebny, V. J.; Kopatz, E. J.; Guzei, I. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2771.
Furthermore, the driving force for the conformational
transformation E-4+•fC-4+• is largely due to the stabilization
of the cationic charge by the effective electronic coupling
between the π-stacked veratrole moieties (vide infra) and
thereby significantly lowering its first oxidation potential
(14) (a) Nelsen, S. F. Chem.-Eur. J. 2000, 6, 581. (b) Badger, B.;
Brocklehurst, B. Nature (London) 1968, 219, 263. (c) Kochi, J. K.; Rathore,
R.; Le Magueres, P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6826
.
(15) Rathore, R.; Burns, C. L.; Deselnicu, M. I. Org. Synth. 2005, 82,
1.
(16) Rathore, R.; Burns, C. L.; Deselnicu, M. I. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2887
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 9, 2009
1941