M. Koufaki et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 1107–1112
1111
Table 1
128.8, 123.9, 120.9, 118.1, 114.3, 111.2, 108.7, 68.1, 55.9, 53.6, 38.7,
30.3, 28.9, 23.4. MS m/z: 396 [M þ H]þ.
Efficacy and potency of the tropolone analogues to protect glutamate-challenged
HT22 cells from oxidative stress-induced cell death.
Compound
EC50
(mean ꢁ SEM)
(
m
M)a
Relative
Efficacy (%)c
4.2. Biology
potencyb
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.40 ꢁ 0.35
1.70 ꢁ 0.33
0.96 ꢁ 0.21
0.08 ꢁ 0.02
0.09 ꢁ 0.02
0.92 ꢁ 0.13
>10
3.4
2.8
5.0
60
53
5.2
<0.5
1.9
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
1
88% (full)
91% (full)
100% (full)
62% (partial)
89% (full)
80% (full)
ns
87% (full)
ns
30% (weak)
ns
4.2.1. Evaluation of the activity of tropolone derivatives to protect
glutamate-challenged HT22 cells from oxidative stress-induced
cell death
Evaluation of the in vitro neuroprotective activity of the tropo-
lone derivatives was carried out as previously described [16], with
minor modifications. Briefly, HT22 cells were plated in a 96-well flat
2.56 ꢁ 0.21
bottom plate at a density of 4000 cells per well in 100 ml of DMEM-
11
14
tropolone
>10
Hepes-GlutaMAX medium containing 10% of fetal bovine serum.
24 h after plating, the cells were challenged with 5 mM glutamate in
the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of test
compounds in fresh medium for an additional 24 h prior to assess-
ing MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide] conversion to formazan as a means to measure relative
numbers of living cells. Cells that were not challenged with gluta-
mate served to test compound cytotoxicity at the different
concentrations tested, whereas cells exposed to glutamate in the
presence of test compounds served to assess invitro neuroprotective
activity by comparison. Cells exposed only to vehicle (DMSO) or
glutamate served as controls. Conversion to formazan was assessed
by the difference in optical density (dOD) at 550 and 670 nm. Cell
death (CD) in the absence of test compound was calculated by
>10
>10
4.80 ꢁ 0.42
b
-thujaplicin
62% (partial)
ns ¼ non-significant.
a
EC50 values are test compound concentrations that are able to maintain the
viability of glutamate-exposed cells to a level equal to 50% of that of non-exposed
cells. Values are mean ꢁ SEM of at least three independent experiments similar to
that shown in Fig. 1.
b
Relative (to b-thujaplicin) potencies were calculated by [EC50 -thujaplicin/EC50
b
compound].
c
Compounds exhibiting statistically significant effects in protecting cell viability
at 10 M were classified as exhibiting full, partial or weak in vitro neuroprotective
m
efficacy depending on whether their % neuroprotective effect was respectively,
67–100, 34–66 and ꢄ33%. Values are the mean of at least three independent
experiments similar to that shown in Fig. 1.
CDVehicle ¼ [(dODVehicle ꢃ dODGlutamate
in the presence of test compound was calculated by CDCom-
¼ [(dODCompound ꢃ dODCompoundþGlutamate
* 100/dODCompound].
* 100/
)
* 100/dODVehicle]. Cell death
2 h and at ambient temperature for 24 h. After completion of the
reaction, AcOEt was added and the organic layer was washed
with sat. aqueous NaCl, dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent
evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography
(AcOEt/pet. Ether 80:20). Yield: 44 mg (22%), yellow oil. 1H NMR
: 7.48 (d, J ¼ 9.1 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J ¼ 9.1 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (s, 1H), 4.52
(s, 2H), 4.01 (s, 3H), 2.96–2.92 (m, 1H), 1.36 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H).
13C NMR
: 178.6, 163.9, 154.9, 140.5, 136.4, 123.9, 114.3, 56.5,
)
pound
% Neuroprotection was calculated by [(CDVehicle ꢃ CDCompound
)
CDVehicle]. Direct interference of the test compounds with MTT
conversion to formazan was excluded using mock cultures deprived
of HT22 cells. Interference of the tropolone analogues with mito-
chondrial conversion of MTT to formazan under normal growth
conditions was excluded using the trypan blue exclusion assay to
directly determine the number of living cells.
d
d
54.5, 39.2, 23.8.
Acknowledgments
4.1.7. 7-[(4-Benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)methyl]-4-isopropyl-2-
methoxy-2,4,6-cycloheptatrien-1-one (14)
To a solution of prop-2-ynylbenzene (0.021 mL, 0.17 mmol) in
a mixture of t-BuOH/H2O (4/1, 0.71 mL), were added azide 13
This work is supported in part by the Center for Drug Discovery,
Northeastern University, Boston, USA and by ‘‘ EURODESY’’ MEST-
CT2005-020575.
(40 mg, 0.17 mmol), sodium L-ascorbate (4.0 mg, 0.017 mmol) and
CuSO4 (1 mg, 0.0017 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at ambient
temperature for 24 h. After cooling at 0 ꢀC, AcOEt and H2O were
added and the organic layer was washed with ammonia, sat.
aqueous NaCl, dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent evaporated. The
residue was purified by column chromatography (AcOEt/pet.ether
References
[1] P.N. Diouf, N. Delbarre, D. Perrin, P. Ge´rardin, C. Rapin, J.P. Jacquot, E. Gelhaye,
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 (2002) 4377–4382.
[2] (a) T. Baba, H. Nakano, K. Tamai, D. Sawamura, K. Hanada, I. Hashimoto,
Y. Arima, J. Investig. Dermatol. 110 (1998) 24–28.
90:10). Yield: 51 mg (87%), yellow solid. mp: 87–90 ꢀC. 1H NMR
d:
(b) Y. Inamori, Y. Sakagami, Y. Morita, M. Shibata, M. Sugiura, Y. Kumeda,
T. Okabe, H. Tsujibo, N. Ishida, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 23 (2000) 995–997.
(c) M. Baya, P. Soulounganga, E. Gelhaye, P. Gerardin, Pest Manag. Sci. 57
(2001) 833–838.
7.52 (s, 1H), 7.38 (d, J ¼ 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (bs, 4H), 7.19–7.16 (m, 1H),
6.74 (d, J ¼ 9.6 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (s, 1H), 5.47 (s, 2H), 4.01 (s, 2H), 3.93 (s,
3H), 2.85–2.81 (m, 1H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.22 (s, 3H). 13C NMR
d: 177.9,
[3] S.R. Budihas, I. Gorshkova, S. Gaidamakov, A. Wamiru, M.K. Bona, M.A. Parniak,
R.J. Crouch, J.B. McMahon, J.A. Beutler, S.F.J. Le Grice, Nucleic Acids Res. 33
(2005) 1249–1256.
[4] D. Mesa-Siverio, A. Este´vez-Braun, A.G. Ravelo, J.R. Murguia, A. Rodrıguez-
Afonso, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2003) 4243–4247.
164.4, 155.8, 151.1, 147.2, 139.3, 139.2, 138.4, 128.6, 128.4, 126.3,
123.9, 123.8, 114.3, 65.0, 56.4, 53.4, 38.9, 32.2, 23.4. MS m/z: 350
[M þ H]þ. HRMS: Calcd for C21H24N3O2 [M þ H]þ 350.1869, found
350.1862.
[5] B. Bhattacharyya, D. Panda, S. Gupta, M. Banerjee, Med. Res. Rev. 28 (2008)
155–183.
[6] P.-T. Doulias, L. Nousis, B.-Z. Zhu, B. Frei, D. Galaris, Free Radic. Res. 39 (2005)
125–135.
[7] M. Yamato, J. Ando, K. Sakaki, K. Hashigaki, Y. Wataya, S. Tsukagoshi, T. Tashiro,
T. Tsuruo, J. Med. Chem. 35 (1992) 267–273.
4.1.8. 7-[(4-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)methyl]-4-
isopropyl-2-methoxy-2,4,6-cycloheptatrien-1-one (15)
Prepared following the procedure described for 14. Purification
by column chromatography (AcOEt/pet.ether 80:20) Yield: 29 mg
[8] A.M. Boguszewska-Chachulska, M. Krawczyk, A. Najda, K. Kopan´ ska,
´
´
A. Stankiewicz-Drogon, W. Zagorski-Ostoja, M. Brener, Biochem. Biophys. Res.
(53%), yellow viscous oil. 1H NMR
d
: 8.06 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d, J ¼ 9.5 Hz,
Comm. 341 (2006) 641–647.
[9] I. Koga, H. Yamazaki, S. Matsumoto, T. Matsumoto, US2005/130982.
[10] I. Koga, K. Narita, A. Okada, EP995741.
[11] N. Itoh, M. Kunihara, H. Kushida, W.W. McWhorter, S. Nomura, K. Ozawa, M.
Taniguchi, K. Tsuzuki, US5592144.
1H), 7.42 (s, 1H), 7.31–7.28 (m, 1H), 6.88–6.73 (m, 3H), 5.60 (s, 2H),
3.96 (s, 3H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 2.89–2.83 (m, 1H), 1.26 (s, 3H),
1.24 (s, 3H). 13C NMR
d: 178.1, 167.7, 164.5, 156.1, 149.1, 138.9, 130.9,