12702
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12702-12703
palladium catalyst may control the last issue,8 resolution of the
first three prerequisites required the discovery of a catalyst for
the alcohol nucleophile to provide the chemo- and regioselectivity.
In our search for achieving this goal, we have uncovered a
remarkable catalytic role for trialkylboranes in promoting the
nucleophilic addition of alcohols chemo-, regio-, and enantiose-
lectively to vinyl epoxides.
As suspected, the reaction of vinyl epoxide 2a with methanol
or benzyl alcohol in the presence of Pd(0) and the chiral ligand
3a led to no reaction or almost no reaction (<6%), respectively,
over 18 h.
A Two-Component Catalyst System for Asymmetric
Allylic Alkylations with Alcohol Pronucleophiles
Barry M. Trost,* Ernest J. McEachern, and F. Dean Toste
Department of Chemistry
Stanford UniVersity
Stanford, California 94305-5080
ReceiVed September 11, 1998
The importance of chiral nonracemic building blocks for the
synthesis of biologically important target molecules continues to
grow, especially as a result of the explosion of molecular targets
in the pharmaceutical and agrichemical arenas. Tartaric acid
exemplifies the value of chiral nonracemic oxygen-bearing
synthetic intermediates1 but also some of the problems, dif-
ferentiating and manipulating the functionality. An alternative
family, wherein such functional group manipulations are simpler,
is the vinylglycidols 1, but their access in chiral, nonracemic form
is frequently not straightforward.2-5 The ready access to racemic
vinyl epoxides via epoxidation of 1,3-dienes6 makes their dera-
cemization, in contrast to a kinetic resolution, to form chiral
nonracemic vinylglycidols very attractive, especially if the two
hydroxyl groups are differentiated intrinsic to the deracemization
reaction. Palladium-catalyzed asymmetric additions of alcohols
could be a solution if (i) the normal poor reactivity of alcohols
as nucleophiles7 could be overcome, (ii) the alcohols would react
regioselectively to give the vicinal hydroxyether, (iii) the product
primary alcohol would not compete effectively with the reactant
alcohol (a most subtle type of chemoselectivity), and (iv)
diastereomeric interconversion of the π-allylpalladium intermedi-
ates could occur faster than nucleophilic attack. Whereas the
As envisioned in eq 1, treatment of isoprene or where mono-
(1) For applications towards vinylglycidol, see: Rao, A. V.; Reddy, E. R.;
Joshi, B. V.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6497; Howes, D. A.;
Brookes, M. H.; Coates, D.; Golding, B. T.; Hudson, A. T. J. Chem. Res. (M)
1983, 217. For an overview, see: Seebach, D.; Hungerbu¨hler, E. In Modern
Synthetic Methods 1980; Scheffold, R.; Ed.; Otto Salle Verlag: Frankfurt am
Main, 1980; Vol. 2, pp 91-171.
epoxide with 1 equiv of trimethyl borate in the presence of
(dba)3Pd2‚CHCl3 (4) and ligand 3a gave the desired glycol
monoether 1a in 80% yield but only 2% ee. Independent
experiments show that trialkylborates do not react with the epoxide
in the absence of a palladium catalyst. Since equilibration of
the π-allylpalladium intermediates (as depicted in eq 1) must be
fast compared to alkoxide transfer to obtain good ee, we decreased
the concentration of the transfer agent, trimethylborate, to 1%
but added a stoichiometric amount of methanol. Indeed, the ee
increased to 49%. Decreasing the effectiveness of the boron to
form an “ate” complex by switching to diethylmethoxyborane9,10
increased the ee in both the stoichiometric and catalytic reactions
to 58% and 90%, respectively. Generating diethylmethoxyborane
in situ from triethylborane and methanol led to the most
convenient and best results, giving an 88% isolated yield and 94%
ee of 5a (R ) R′ ) CH3).
(2) A kinetic resolution of butadiene monoepoxide to form vinylglycidol
has been reported, see: Tokunaga, M.; Larrow, J. F.; Kakiuchi, F.; Jacobsen,
E. N. Science 1997, 277, 936.
(3) For enzymatic resolution of derivatives of vinylglycidol, see: Boaz,
N. W.; Zimmerman, R. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 153; Suzuki, T.;
Kasai, N.; Minamiura, N. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 239. For solvolysis
of the corresponding enantiomerically pure vinyl epoxide to form the
monoethers of vinylglycidol in addition to varying amounts of 1,4-adduct,
see: Boaz, N. W. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 15. For kinetic resolution
of the monotosylate by asymmetric epoxidation, see: Neagu, C.; Hase, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1629.
(4) For other asymmetric syntheses of vinylglycidol and the 2-methyl
derivative, see: Saibata, R.; Sarma, M. S. P.; Abushnab, E. Synth. Commun.
1989, 19, 3077; Jurczak, J.; Pikul, S.; Bauer, T. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 447;
Ohwa, M.; Kogure, T.; Eliel, E. L. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2599.
(5) Asymmetric dihydroxylation of butadiene or isoprene has not been
reported to our knowledge. trans-Piperylene is reported to give moderate yields
and moderate chemoselectivity with ee’s of 90% and 72% for the two diols.
See Becker, H.; Soler, M. A.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 1345;
For a review, see Kolb, H. C.; Van Nieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B.
Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2483.
Using these conditions, a variety of alcohols were added to
isoprene monoepoxide as summarized in Table 1. The examples
show good chemoselectivity wherein nitriles, esters, and ketones
all are tolerated. With 2-cyanoethanol (Table 1, entry 4), the ee
was 81% under our standard conditions. Assessing that the source
of the somewhat diminished ee might still arise from too rapid
trapping of the π-allylpalladium intermediate, we switched to a
more hindered borane, tri-sec-butylborane, as the cocatalyst.
(6) Both butadiene and isoprene monoepoxides are commercially available.
Such epoxides are available by the direct epoxidation of the corresponding
dienes. For butadiene monoepoxide from diene and oxygen, see: Monnier, J.
R. In 3rd World Congress on Oxidation Catalysis, 1997; Grasselli, R. K.,
Oyama, S. T., Gaffney, A. M., Lyons, J. E., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 1997;
pp 135-149. For isoprene monoepoxide, see: Eletti-Bianchi, G.; Centini, F.;
Re, L. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1648; Fransen, M. R.; Palings, I.; Lugtenberg,
J. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1980, 99, 384.
(7) Cf. Trost, B. M.; Tenaglia, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2931; Sinou,
D.; Frappa, I.; Lhoste, P.; Powanski, S.; Kryczka, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 1251; For some recent intramolecular processes, see: Fournier-Nguefack,
C.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, P. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4353; Thorey, C.; Wilken, J.;
He´nin, F.; Martens, J.; Mehler, T.; Muzart, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
5527. For a review, see: Godleski, S. A. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis;
Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Semmelhack, M. F., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford,
1991; Vol. 4, pp 585-662.
(8) Trost, B. M.; Bunt, R. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 99.
(9) For alkenylborane coupling, see: Miyaura, N.; Tanabe, Y.; Suginome,
H.; Suzuki, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1982, 233, C13.
(10) Commonly, such reagents transfer alkyl groups, see: Abe, S.; Miyaura,
N.; Suzuki, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 65, 2863.
10.1021/ja983238k CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/20/1998