K. Nishide et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 9237–9240
9239
a view from upper side ( Newman projection )
small steric effect
Alder's orbital interaction
Nucleophile-electrophile interaction
MeO2C
MeO2C
H
MeO2C
OMe
O+Al-Cl3
MeO2C
H
O
Me
O
O
OMe
Y
OY
•
O
•
•
O
OMe
O+Al-Cl3
H
Al-Cl3
O+
H
OMe
O
O
•
H
H
H
O
O
Y
OMe
Ts-2
Ts-4
Ts-1
N
H
<
N
H
<
O
N
H
1 : ~ 2
Y = Me, Bn, tBu
N
N
1 : 2
N
O
OY
YO
H
Y
H
Y = Me, Bn
O
exo
O
exo
endo
endo
steric effect
O-tBu
large steric effect
Cl3Al-
RO2C
O+
RO2C
RO2C
H
RO2C
H
OR
O
O
O
tBu
R
•
O+
Al-Cl3
tBu
•
•
•
O
H
OR
H
OR
OR
O
O
Al-Cl3
O+
Ts-3
H
H
OR
H
H
O
H
=
N
O
OtBu
>>
O
O
N
N
N
N
O
N
tBu
O
H
tBu
H
R = Me, Et,
R = Et, c-Hex,
Menthyl
O
O
c-Hex, Menthyl
H
endo
exo
exo
endo
MeO2C
H
steric effect
tBu
MeO2C
H
O
OMe
O
MeO2C
H
MeO2C
OMe
•
•
O
O
O
severe
steric effect
•
•
H
O
H
O
H
O
O-Me
Ts-5
Ts-6
OMe
O
OMe
H
O
>>>
exclusive
H
H
N
O
S
N
≥
N
S
N
tBu
O
tBu
N
Me
H
Me
endo
exo
exo
endo
Scheme 2. Comparison of transition states in Diels–Alder reaction.
Namely, the exo selectivity in entries 1–4 was very
curious since these molecules lack significant steric hin-
drance in the endo transition state so that the usual
endo selectivity would be expected by secondary orbital
control (the Alder rule). Therefore, it was suggested
that another new attractive interaction might exist in
the exo transition state in this Diels–Alder reaction of
the dimethyl allene-1,3-dicarboxylate with N-alkoxycar-
bonylpyrrole. Transition state energy calculations (R=
Me, R%=CO2Me) using semi-empirical PM3 revealed
that the energy of the exo transition state was 0.77
kcal/mol more stable than that of the endo transition
state.9 This energy difference corresponded well with
the exo selectivity of these reactions. We thought the
attractive nucleophile–electrophile interaction10 as a
candidate of the new attractive interaction, which
would operate between one of the two oxygens of an
ester group in the dienophile and the carbonyl carbon
of N-alkoxycarbonyl- or N-acylpyrrole. The proposed
transition states in the Diels–Alder reaction are illus-
trated in Scheme 2. The endo and exo transition states
in the reactions of N-alkoxycarbonylpyrroles with
dimethyl allene-1,3-dicarboxylate (entries 1–6) are
depicted as Ts-1 (thermal) and Ts-2 (AlCl3 assisted). If
the energy of the new interaction is larger than that of
the Alder orbital interaction, the exo selectivity can be
explained reasonably well except for the Lewis acid
assisted reaction of N-Boc-pyrrole (entry 5), in which
considerable steric interactions between the Me group
of the ester and the t-Bu group of the carbamate would
have to be added (Ts-4). Next, the transition states in
the reaction of N-Boc-pyrrole with allene-1,3-dicar-
boxylates bearing the bulky R group (entries 7–12) are
depicted as Ts-3 (thermal) and Ts-4 (AlCl3 assisted).
The exo predominance is diminished in Ts-3 by the
small steric repulsion between the t-butoxyl group and
the bulky R (Et, c-Hex, menthyl) groups of the esters
(entries 8, 10 and 12). On the other hand, the high endo
selectivity in the Lewis acid assisted reactions (entries 7,
9 and 11) can be rationalized by the large steric repul-
sion between the ester moiety coordinated with the
Lewis acid and the tert-butoxycarbonyl group in Ts-4.
The difference of the endo selectivity in the reaction of
the pyrroles having N-pivaloyl and N-sulfonyl sub-
stituents (entries 13–16) can also be attributed to the
presence or the absence of the new attractive interac-
tion based on the bulkiness of the N-protective groups
in the transition states, Ts-5 and Ts-6.
It should be noted that this new attractive interaction is
more effective than the Alder secondary orbital control
in the above reactions. Such a fundamental effect in the
Diels–Alder reaction of pyrrole derivatives had not
been known until now because of the low reactivity of
pyrroles. However, we were able to observe this novel
effect by using less hindered and highly reactive allene
derivatives as dienophiles. Further studies are under
way in our laboratory.
References
1. Drew, M. G. B.; George, A. V.; Isaacs, N. S.; Rzepa, H.
S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1277–1284.
2. Kotsuki, H.; Mori, Y.; Nishizawa, H.; Ochi, M.; Ma-
tsuoka, K. Heterocycles 1982, 19, 1915–1920.
3. (a) Ikeda, I.; Honda, K.; Osawa, E.; Shiro, M.; Aso, M.;
Kanematsu, K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2031–2037; (b)
Aso, M.; Ikeda, I.; Kawabe, T.; Shiro, M.; Kanematsu,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5787–5790; (c) Ikeda, I.;
Gondo, A.; Shiro, M.; Kanematsu, K. Heterocycles 1993,
36, 2669–2672.
4. Node, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Ichihashi, S.; Nishide, K. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6331–6334.
5. Node, M.; Nishide, K.; Fujiwara, T.; Ichihashi, S. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 2363–2364.