Design and Synthesis of Molecular Tongs
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1999, Vol. 42, No. 6 961
monitored over a period of 5 min at 30 °C. For the more potent
inhibitors the inhibition pathway was characterized using the
kinetic analysis of Zhang et al.8 The kinetic measurements
were carried out with constant initial substrate concentration
[S]0 , Km (Km ) 103 µM)17 using at least five different
concentrations of enzyme (2.37-11.8 nM) for various concen-
trations of inhibitor.
Molecu la r Mod elin g. Molecular modeling was performed
using a SGI Iris Indigo system (XS 4000) and the Sybyl 6.3
program from Tripos. Energy calculations were done using
Tripos force field, Gesteiger-Marsilii charges, and a dielectric
constant of 1. Crystallographic protease structure 8HVP
downloaded from the Protein Data Bank was used. One
monomer and the TLNF and QITL strands of the other
monomer were retained. The tongs were built on the TLNF
and QITL fragments in such a way that the minimization
procedure of the obtained complexes converged easily (termi-
nation gradient of 0.5 kcal/mol‚Å).
Ch em istr y. Gen er a l Syn th esis of Sca ffold s. Exa m p le
of Eth yl 4-((7-(4-Eth oxy-4-oxobu toxy)-2-n a p h th yl)oxy)-
bu ta n oa te (5). To a stirred solution of 2,7-dihydroxynaph-
thalene (10 g, 0.062 mol) and potassium carbonate (21.4 g,
0.155 mol) in DMF (200 mL) was added slowly ethyl 4-bro-
mobutanoate (36.3 g, 0.186 mol). After 3 h solvent and excess
reagent were evaporated, and the residue was dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (100 mL). This solution was washed with water (2 ×
50 mL), dried (MgSO4), and evaporated. The resulting residue
was chromatographed (silica gel, CH2Cl2) giving rise to 5 as
an oily product (18.4 g, 75% yield): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.5 (d,
2H, J ) 8 Hz), 6.94 (s, 2H), 6.90 (d, 2H, J ) 8 Hz), 4.07 (q,
2H, J ) 7 Hz), 4.06 (q, 2H, J ) 7 Hz), 3.9 (t, 4H, J ) 7 Hz),
2.5 (t, 4H, J ) 7 Hz), 2.0 (m, 4H), 1.16 (t, 3H, J ) 7 Hz), 1.15
(t, 3H, J ) 7 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 173.6, 157.3, 135.8, 129,
124.3, 116.1, 106, 66.6, 60.4, 51.6, 30.8, 24.6. Anal. (C22H28O6).
Our results could be compared with those of Zutshi
et al.14 who synthesized interfacial peptides cross-linked
with polyalkyl chains. An IC50 value of 57 µM was
obtained for the molecule displaying two identical
interfacial peptides STLNF-OH cross-linked by the
flexible spacer -(CO)-(CH2)12-(CO)-. With a rigid spacer
(naphthalene) and a shorter peptidic sequence (TLNF-
OMe, compound 26), a better inhibitory potency was
obtained (IC50 ) 4.4 µM, Kid ) 1 µM). The more potent
inhibitor described by Zutshi et al. (IC50 ) 2µM) was
obtained with two different peptidic sequences repro-
ducing the N- and C-termini of HIV-1 PR monomer
(PQILW-OH and STLNF-OH, respectively, cross-
linked with a 14-methylene spacer). With two identical
and shorter peptidic strands (VLV-OMe, compound 20),
a comparable inhibitory efficiency was obtained (IC50
) 2 µM, Kid ) 0.56 µM). The advantage of our tongs
may be explained by the structural difference of the two
types of spacers: aromatic-based spacers introduce a
steric constraint which likely provides a positive en-
tropic effect in contrast with the highly flexible spacers
reported by Zutshi et al. A similar strategy based on a
rigid scaffold was described by LaBrenz et al. in order
to understand the energetics of â-sheet-based molecular
recognition between a constrained peptide host and a
linear peptide guest.15 Finally, another advantage of
constrained tongs resides in their symmetrical character
allowing easy syntheses.
Con clu sion
E t h yl
4-((3-(4-et h oxy-4-oxob u t oxy)p h en yl)oxy)b u -
In this work, we have demonstrated the validity of
the concept of constrained tongs built as two peptidic
strands attached to a rigid naphthalenediol- or py-
ridinediol-based scaffold for inducing efficient antidimer
inhibitions of the HIV-1 PR. This approach also shows
that molecules with only tripeptidic strands which did
not reproduce the N- and C-termini of HIV-1 PR
monomer led to efficient inhibition. The best inhibitor
is structurally simple and very easy to synthesize.
ta n oa te (1): 85% yield; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.11 (t, 1H, J ) 7
Hz), 6.43 (m, 3H), 4.11 (q, 4H, J ) 7 Hz), 3.94 (t, 4H, J ) 7
Hz), 2.41 (t, 4H, J ) 7 Hz), 2.06 (m, 4H), 1.23 (t, 6H, J ) 7
Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 173, 159.9, 129.6, 106.6, 101.2, 66.5,
60.2, 30.6, 24.4, 14. Anal. (C18H26O6).
Eth yl 4-((6-(4-eth oxy-4-oxobu toxy)-2-p yr id yl)oxy)bu -
ta n oa te (3): 59% yield; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.29 (t, 1H, J ) 8
Hz), 6.1 (d, 2H, J ) 8 Hz), 4.14 (t, 4H, J ) 6 Hz), 3.97 (q, 4H,
J ) 7 Hz), 2.32 (t, 4H, J ) 7.5 Hz), 2.0-1.86 (m, 4H), 1.09 (t,
6H, J ) 7 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 173.4, 162.6, 140.9, 101.4,
64.7, 60.3, 31.0, 24.6, 14.2. Anal. (C17H25O6‚1/4H2O).
4-((7-(4-Meth oxy-4-oxobu toxy)-2-n a ph th yl)oxy)bu ta n o-
ic Acid (6). A solution of diester 5 (1 g, 0.26 mmol) and NaOH
(0.08 g, 2 mmol) in methanol (100 mL) was heated (50 °C) for
12 h and then evaporated and the residue put in water (50
mL). The aqueous solution was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 ×
50 mL) in order to remove the nonhydrolyzed diester, acidified
(HCl, 10%), and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 50 mL). This
organic solution was washed with water, dried (MgSO4), and
evaporated giving 6 as a white cristalline product (0.3 g, 30%
yield): mp 85 °C (petroleum ether-ether); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ
7.63 (d, 2H, J ) 7 Hz), 7.05-6.9 (m, 4H), 4.12 (t, 2H, J ) 7
Hz), 4.08 (t, 2H, J ) 7 Hz), 3.7 (s, 3H), 2.63 (t, 2H, J ) 7 Hz),
2.55 (t, 2H, J ) 7 Hz), 2.25-2.08 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ
179.5, 173.8, 157.3, 135.8, 129.1, 124.3, 116.2, 106.0, 66.6, 66.4,
51.7, 30.6, 24.6, 24.3. Anal. (C19H22O6).
Exp er im en ta l Section
HIV-1 protease was kindly supplied by H. J . Schramm, Max-
Planck Institut fu¨r Biochemie (Martinsried, Germany). It was
expressed using the plasmid pET9c-PR, and the isolation and
purification procedure is described by Billich et al.16 The stock
solution (34 µM protease in 50 mM MES, pH 6.0, 1 mM EDTA,
1 mM DTT, 0.5 M NaCl, 5% v/v glycerol) was stored in small
aliquots at -80 °C. The fluorogenic substrate DABCYL-S-Q-
N-Y-P-I-V-Q-EDANS was purchased from Bachem. Reagents
and solvents were from commercial sources. The fluorescence
measurements were performed using a J obin Yvon spectro-
fluorometer. NMR spectra were done on AC 200 Bruker and
ARX 400 Bruker spectrometers. Elemental analyses were
performed by the Service de microanalyse de la Faculte´ de
Pharmacie. The pKA measurements were performed in water
using a Metrohm 632 pH apparatus equipped with a 614
impulsomat.
En zym a tic Assa ys. Enzymatic assays were performed in
100 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 M NaCl, pH 4.7, 3%
DMSO (v/v). Inhibitors and the substrate were dissolved in
DMSO before addition to the buffer. For the determination of
IC50 values, 0.52 µL of a 3 mM solution of substrate (final
concentration, 5.2 µM) was added to 8.5 µL of 4-10 different
concentrations of inhibitors (final volume, 300 µL). The
enzymatic reaction was initiated by the addition of enzyme
(prediluted in buffer containing 1 mg/mL bovine serum
albumin). The final enzyme concentration was 7.5 nM. The
increase in fluorescence at 490 nm (λexc ) 340 nm) was
4-((7-(3-Car boxypr opoxy)-2-n aph th yl)oxy)bu tan oic Acid
(7). A solution of ethanol (50 mL) containing 5 (6 g, 0.016
mmol) and 10% KOH (100 mL) was stirred at reflux for 4 h.
Then the solution was poured in ice and extracted with CH2-
Cl2 (2 × 50 mL). The aqueous layer was acidified (HCl, 10%),
and the precipitate was filtered and washed with water giving
rise to a crystalline product. (5.84 g, 97% yield): mp 144 °C;
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, 2H, J ) 7 Hz), 7.25 (d, 2H, J ) 1.3
Hz), 7 (dd, 2H, J ) 7 Hz, J ) 1.3 Hz), 4.1 (t, 4H, J ) 7 Hz), 2.5
(t, 4H, J ) 7 Hz), 2 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 174.1, 157,
136, 129, 123.8, 116, 106.2, 66.4, 30.2, 24.2. Anal. (C18H20O6).
4-((3-(3-Car boxypr opoxy)ph en yl)oxy)bu tan oic acid (2):
1
95% yield; mp 170 °C; H NMR (DMSO) δ 7.2-7.1 (m, 1H),