103Rh Chemical Shift
Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1999 1197
eters arguably influence the properties of a catalytically
active metal center simultaneously.6
acetonate) as model compounds for the investigation of
the intrinsic influence of bidentate chelating ligands on
structure, reactivity, and spectroscopic properties of the
[(P2)Rh] fragment.13 Experimental data for structurally
closely related compounds suggested a potentially useful
empirical correlation between the 103Rh shifts of com-
plexes [(P2)Rh(hfacac)] and their catalytic activity in the
hydrogenation of CO2 to formic acid.13a During extension
of these studies to a broader range of ligands, however,
the connections between structural features, 103Rh
shifts, and chemical reactivity were found to be very
subtle.13b
The chemical shift of a transition metal is a very
sensitive probe for electronic and geometric changes in
the coordination sphere of the nucleus under scrutiny.7-10
Although there is no a priori reason for an intrinsic
relation between NMR shifts and chemical reactivity,
a number of empirical correlations of this type have
been established.9b-e,11-13 In a seminal study, Bo¨nne-
mann and von Philipsborn correlated 59Co shifts and
catalytic properties of substituted cyclopentadienyl
Co(I) complexes.12 Similarly, direct relationships be-
tween 103Rh shifts and rate constants have been de-
scribed for stoichiometric exchange processes involving
cyclopentadienyl Rh(I)9b and Rh(III)9c complexes. The
chemical shift difference between the diastereomeric
intermediates in catalytic hydrogenation of prochiral
olefins using chiral phosphine rhodium complexes has
been related to the enantioselective discrimination.9d
More recently, A° kermark et al. have correlated stability
constants of complexes [(acac)Rh(alkene)2] with 103Rh
shifts.9e
To proceed from purely empirical correlations in
practical systems to a deeper understanding of the
underlying principles, the intrinsic influence of the
controlling ligand on the NMR shift of the metal center
in the [(P2)Rh] fragment has to be elucidated. Despite
an increasing body of data,10,13 in particular from the
seminal work by the group of Elsevier,10a,b the factors
governing 103Rh shifts in Rh(I) phosphine complexes are
far from being fully understood. A detailed analysis of
the solid state NMR data of related complexes contain-
ing [(P2)M] (M ) Mo, W, Pt) fragments by Lindner et
al. has revealed a remarkable sensitivity of the principal
components of the 31P chemical shift tensor on small
structural changes, suggesting that changes in the
coordination geometry might play a major role in
determining the chemical shift of the corresponding
metal centers as well.14 Recently, density-functional
theory based calculations have been shown to reliably
reproduce trends in δ(103Rh) shifts for various rhodium
complexes15 and may thus help in the interpretation of
experimental results obtained from systematic studies.
Herein we present a detailed experimental and com-
putational study on the influence of the geometrical and
electronic properties of chelating phosphine ligands on
the 103Rh chemical shift in complexes containing [(P2)-
Rh] fragments. For neutral 1,3-diketonato complexes,
electronic variation was achieved by introducing sub-
stituents with different inductive effects in the para
position of a chelating bis(aryl)phosphine. Geometric
parameters, for instance P-Rh-P angles ranging from
70° to 100°, were adjusted by variations in the backbone
and the groups R at phosphorus. In addition, selected
ionic complexes containing the [(P2)Rh] fragment were
investigated for comparison.
We have recently introduced the four-coordinate 16e
complexes [(P2)Rh(hfacac)] (hfacac ) hexafluoroacetyl-
(6) For interesting investigations on the relationship between bite
angle and electronic structure see: Hofmann, P.; Meier, C.; Englert,
U.; Schmidt, M. U. Chem. Ber. 1992, 125, 353.
(7) (a) Benn, R.; Rufin´ska, A. Angew. Chem. 1986, 98, 851; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 861. (b) von Philipsborn, W. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1986, 58, 513. (c) Mason, J . Chem. Rev. 1987, 87, 1299. (d)
Pregosin, P. S., Ed. Transition Metal Nuclear Magnetic Resonance;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1991. (e) von Philipsborn, W. Chem. Soc. Rev.,
in press.
(8) For recent examples with transition metals other than rhodi-
um: 55Mn: Dowler, M. E.; Le, T. X.; DeShong, P.; von Philipsborn,
W.; Vo¨hler, M.; Rentsch, D. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 5673. 187Os: Bell,
A. G.; Koz´min´ski, W.; Linden, A.; von Philipsborn, W. Organometallics
1996, 15, 3124. 91Zr: Bu¨hl, M.; Hopp, G.; Beck, S.; Prosenc, M.-H.;
Rief, U.; Brintzinger, H.-H. Organometallics 1996, 15, 778. 57Fe: Benn,
R.; Brenneke, H.; Frings, A.; Lehmkuhl, H.; Mehler, G.; Rufin´ska, A.;
Wildt, T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5561. Meier, E. J . M.;
Koz´min´ski, W.; Linden, A.; Lustenberger, P.; von Philipsborn, W.
Organometallics 1996, 15, 2469.
(9) For recent examples with rhodium and variation in ligands other
than phosphines: (a) Graham, P. B.; Rausch, M. D.; Ta¨schler, K.; von
Philipsborn, W. Organometallics 1991, 10, 3049. (b) Koller, M.; von
Philipsborn, W. Organometallics 1992, 11, 467. (c) Tedesco, V.; von
Philipsborn, W. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3600. (d) Bender, B. R.;
Koller, M.; Nanz, D.; von Philipsborn, W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
5889. (e) A° kermark, B.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; Glaser, J .; O¨ hrstro¨m, L.;
Wahlberg, S.; Wa¨rnmark, K.; Zetterberg, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 3405. (f) Brunet, J .-J .; Commenges, G.; Neibecker, D.; Philippot,
K.; Rosenberg, L. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 6373. (g) Law, D. J .; Bigam,
G.; Cavell, R. G. Can. J . Chem. 1995, 73, 635. (h) Asaro, F.; Costa, G.;
Dreos, R.; Pellizer, G.; von Philipsborn, W. J . Organomet. Chem. 1996,
513, 193. (i) Donkervoort, J . G.; Bu¨hl, M.; Ernsting, J . M.; Elsevier, C.
J . Eur. J . Inorg. Chem. 1999, 27.
(10) For recent examples of rhodium complexes with structural
variations in phosphorus ligands: (a) Ernsting, J . M.; Elsevier, C. J .;
de Lange, W. G. J .; Timmer, K. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1991, 29, S118.
(b) Elsevier, C. J .; Kowall, B.; Kragten, H. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 4836.
(c) Carlton, L. J . Organomet. Chem. 1992, 43, 103. (d) Cherkasova, T.
G.; Varshavsky, Yu. S.; Podkorytov, I. S.; Osetrova, L. V. Rhodium
Express 1993, 0, 21. (e) Gavrilov, K. N.; Ignatenko, A. V.; Teleshev, A.
T. Russ. J . Coord. Chem. 1995, 21, 461. (f) Bo¨rner, A.; Kless, A.; Holz,
J .; Baumann, W.; Tillack, A.; Kadyrov, R. J . Organomet. Chem. 1995,
490, 213. (g) Bo¨rner, A.; Kless, A.; Kempe, R.; Heller, D.; Holz, J .;
Baumann, W. Chem. Ber. 1995, 128, 767. (h) J olly, P. W.; Hopp, G.;
Passelaigne, E.; von Philipsborn, W. Personal communications.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Rem a r k s. All reactions involving air- or moisture-
sensitive materials were performed under argon using stan-
dard Schlenk techniques in dried and deoxygenated solvents.
The complexes [(cod)Rh(hfacac)] (cod ) 1,5-cyclooctadiene, 4)16
and [(P2)Rh(hfacac)]13b (7, 9b-d , 11) were synthesized as
described previously. The ligands 6, 8, 10 were commercial
products or prepared following known procedures.17 Cl2P(CH2)4-
(13) (a) Fornika, R.; Go¨rls, H.; Seemann, B.; Leitner, W. J . Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1479. (b) Angermund, K.; Baumann, W.;
Dinjus, E.; Fornika, R.; Go¨rls, H.; Kessler, M.; Kru¨ger, C.; Leitner,
W.; Lutz, F. Chem. Eur. J . 1997, 3, 755.
(11) For
a
computational prediction of such
a
correlation for
(14) Lindner, E.; Fawzi, R.; Mayer, H. A.; Eichele, K.; Hiller, W.
Organometallics 1992, 11, 1033.
(15) (a) Bu¨hl, M. Organometallics 1997, 16, 261. (b) Bu¨hl, M. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1997, 267, 251.
(16) Leipoldt, J . G.; Grobler, E. C. Trans. Met. Chem. 1986, 11, 110.
(17) (a) Issleib, K.; Mu¨ller, D.-W. Chem. Ber. 1959, 92, 1397. (b) Burt,
R. J .; Chatt, J .; Hussein, W.; Leigh, G. J . J . Organomet. Chem. 1979,
182, 203. (c) Brunner, H.; Lautenschlager, H.-J . Synthesis 1989, 706.
(d) Dinjus, E.; Leitner, W. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 9, 43.
vanadium-catalyzed ethylene polymerization see: Bu¨hl, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 142.
(12) (a) Bo¨nnemann, H.; Brijoux, W.; Brinkmann, R.; Meurers, W.;
Mynott, R.; von Philippsborn, W.; Egolf, T. J . Organomet. Chem. 1984,
272, 231. (b) Bo¨nnemann, H. Angew. Chem. 1985, 97, 264; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 248. (c) For other examples for relations
between structure and 59Co shifts see: Benn, R.; Cibura, K.; Hoffmann,
P.; J onas, K.; Rufin´ska, A. Organometallics 1985, 4, 2214.