Substitution and Addition Reactions at a Pyrrolyl Ligand
Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 11, 1999 2239
as in the bromine positions. The phenyl ring is slipped across
two positions. The site occupancy of each group was refined
dependent upon the other. Final refined occupancies were 0.31-
(3)/0.69(3). Three positions were observed for Br. This was
modeled as partial contamination by the triply brominated
product, consistent with NMR data. This triply brominated
species has a site occupancy of 0.033(2). Details of data
collection and refinement are given in Table 5.
Syn th esis of (P Me2P h )3ReCl2(3-NC4H3Me) (6). Complex
1 (0.200 g, 0.271 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of diethyl ether,
and methyl triflate (100 µL, 0.88 mmol) was syringed into the
solution. Within hours, a yellow precipitate had formed. After
it was stirred at room temperature for 3 days, the green
solution was removed by cannula. The solvent was removed
from this portion, and the remaining complex was identified
as 1 (0.030 g). The yellow-brown precitipate was redissolved
in dichloromethane and extracted with a saturated aqueous
solution of NaHCO3. The solution was then dried over Na2-
SO4, filtered, and dried in vacuo to give a dark yellow-brown
of the SO3 group of the triflate anion. Each group was
successfully refined without restraints. A partial site oc-
cupancy factor was refined for each group such that the total
would sum to full occupancy. The ratio of this occupancy is
0.6(2)/0.4(2). All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with aniso-
tropic parameters for thermal motion. Hydrogens were intially
placed at calculated positions and freely refined in subsequent
cycles of least-squares refinement. Isotropic thermal param-
eters for hydrogen were also refined. The largest peak in the
final difference map, 1.002 e/Å3, is located near Re and is likely
an artifact of absorption. Details of data collection and refine-
ment are given in Table 5.
Attem p ted Rea ction of 1 w ith HOAc. To a solution of 1
(0.0536 g, 0.0727 mmol) in dichloromethane was added acetic
acid (8.0 µL, 0.14 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room
temperature for approximately 4 days. The solvent was
removed in vacuo, and the brown residue was characterized
by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Complex 1 and (PMe2Ph)3ReCl3 were
the major components of the mixture. No evidence for the
complex containing a protonated pyrrolyl ligand was observed.
P r oton a tion of (P Me2P h )3ReCl2(3,4-NC4H2Me2) (7). To
a CDCl3 solution of 7 (0.010 g, 0.013 mmol) and AlCl3 (0.0013
g, 0.01 mmol) was added 1.8 µL of CDCl3 saturated with
gaseous HCl in an NMR tube. The tube was flame-sealed
solid. Chromatography on
a neutral Al2O3 column, with
dichloromethane as eluent, gave a yellow band which was
evaporated to give 6. Yield: 0.088 g, 51%. See Table 1 for NMR
data. MS (ESI): m/z 752 (P); 671 (P - Mepyrr); 614 (P - PMe2-
Ph). The analytical data were calculated for 1 mol of H2O
included with the complex. Evidence for the water molecule
was observed in the NMR spectrum (s, 2 H, 1.51 ppm). Anal.
Calcd for C31H39Cl2NOP3Re: C, 45.25; H, 5.37; N, 1.82.
Found: C, 45.21; H, 4.99; N, 1.88.
Syn th esis of (P Me2P h )3ReCl2(3,4-NC4H2Me2) (7). To a
solution of 6 (0.041 g, 0.055 mmol) in 10 mL of dichlo-
romethane was added methyl triflate (6 µL, 0.05 mmol). After
20 h, the solvent was removed in vacuo. The brown residue
was redissolved in dichloromethane and the solution eluted
on a neutral Al2O3 column with dichloromethane. The first
yellow fraction contained ReCl3(PMe2Ph)3, and the second
yellow fraction contained a mixture of 1 and ReCl3(PMe2Ph)3.
The last fraction, which contained 7, eluted as a red-brown
band with a 10:1 mixture of dichloromethane and tetrahydro-
furan. See Table 1 for NMR data. MS (ESI): m/z 766 (M); 671
1
under vacuum and monitored by H NMR spectroscopy. The
solution immediately turned yellow, and the 1H NMR spectrum
indicated that the pyrrolyl ligand had been protonated at an
R-carbon. After a period of 2-3 days, the spectrum indicated
the quantitative formation of mer-(PMe2Ph)3ReCl3. The free
pyrrole was not isolated in this experiment. 1H NMR of
protonated complex (CDCl3): δ -2.33, -1.86, -0.14 (s, 6 H
each, PMe); 1.64 (s, 2H, NCH2); 4.49, 5.95 (s, 3 H each, Me
pyrr); 4.81 (s, 1 H, R-H, pyrr); 8.64 (t, 2 H J ) 6.9 Hz, m-H,
unique PPh); 8.91 (t, J ) 6.9 Hz, 4 H, m-H, trans-PPh); 11.25
(t, J ) 7.9 Hz, 2 H, p-H, trans-PPh); 11.45 (t, J ) 7.9 Hz, 1 H,
p-H, unique PPh); 12.29 (d, 2 H, J ) 6.9 Hz, o-H, unique PPh);
13.29 (d, 4 H, J ) 6.9 Hz, o-H, trans-PPh). 13C NMR (CDCl3):
δ 122.39, 48.63, 154.39 (PMe); 27.93 (R-C, pyrr); 3.66 (R-CH2,
pyrr): 34.69, 13.80 (Me2 pyrr); 122.45 (p-C, trans PPh); 122.47
(p-C, unique PPh); 134.95 (o-C, trans PPh); 138.41 (m-C, trans
+ unique PPh); 140.95 (o-C, unique PPh).
(M - Me2 - pyrr); 628 (M - PMe2Ph). Anal. Calcd for C30H41
-
Cl2NP3Re: C, 47.06; H, 5.40; N, 1.83. Found: C, 46.98, H, 5.28;
N, 1.55.
Isola tion of 3-Meth ylp yr r ole. Complex 1 (0.11 g, 0. 15
mmol) was dissolved in diethyl ether, and methyl triflate (0.70
µL, 0.62 mmol) was added by syringe. The solution was stirred
overnight. The resulting yellow precipitate was filtered under
nitrogen and washed with diethyl ether. A portion of this
cationic product was redissolved in CD3CN, and LiCl (4 equiv)
and AlCl3 (2 equiv) were added. The salts did not completely
dissolve, but the solution was stirred at room temperature for
4 days. The acetonitrile was removed under vacuum at room
temperature, the residue was dissolved in CDCl3, and the
volatiles were vacuum-transferred while the solution was
heated at 45 °C. The resulting pyrrole products were identified
by NMR and GC/mass spectroscopy as 3-methylpyrrole (ca.
Syn th esis of [(P Me2P h )3ReCl2(NC4H5)]OTf (8). Complex
1 (0.134 g, 0.182 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL of Et2O, and
triflic acid (19 µL, 0.24 mmol) was added by syringe. A bright
yellow precipitate formed immediately. The solution was
stirred for 2 h at room temperature, and then the precipitate
was allowed to settle, the solution was decanted, and the
yellow solid was washed with diethyl ether. Yield: 0.155 g,
95%. The product was recrystallized by vapor diffusion of
diethyl ether into a dichloromethane solution of the compound.
See Table 1 for NMR data. Anal. Calcd for C29H38Cl2F3NO3P3-
SRe: C, 39.28; H, 4.28; N, 1.58. Found: C, 38.84; H, 4.02; N,
1.69.
X-r a y Diffr a ction Stu d y of 8. The crystal was mounted
to a thin glass fiber on a tapered copper mounting pin. This
assembly was aligned on a Siemens SMART CCD diffracto-
meter equipped with an LT-2A low-temperature apparatus
operating at 171 K. Data collection to 0.68 Å covered slightly
more than a hemisphere of arbitrary orientation. Each 0.3° ω
scan was exposed for 30 s. The initial orientation matrix was
determined from 3 approximately orthogonal sets of 20 0.3° ω
scans, each with a total exposure of 10 s. Standard uncertain-
ties of the final cell parameters were refined from 8192
reflections of 49 568 with I > 10σ(I) harvested from the data
collection. Data collection was complete to 0.75 Å and 91.9%
complete to 0.70 Å.
1
65%), 2-methylpyrrole (ca. 15%), and pyrrole (20%). H NMR
(CDCl3: 3-methylpyrrole, δ 2.09 (s, Me), multiplets at 6.80,
6.55, 6.04; 2-methylpyrrole, δ 2.26 (s, Me), multiplets at 6.63,
6.06, and 5.88; pyrrole, multiplets at δ 6.68 and 6.23. The NMR
spectrum of the remaining residue confirmed that no Re-
pyrrole complexes remained. Resonances were observed for
(PMe2Ph)3ReCl3 and a second unidentified pyrrole-free Re
complex.
Syn th esis of (P Me2P h )3Cl2Re[3-NC4H3-C(CO2Me)CH-
(CO2Me)] (9). Complex 1 (0.105 g, 0.142 mmol) was dissolved
in 40 mL of toluene. To the yellow-brown solution was added
dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD) (0.0208 g, 18.0 µL,
0.146 mmol) and glacial acetic acid (8.0 µL). The solution was
stirred for 3 days at room temperature; then the solvent was
removed in vacuo to give a brown oil. The NMR spectrum of
the crude product showed a mixture of 15% 1 and 85% 9. The
brown oil was redissolved in dichloromethane and loaded onto
Structure solution via direct methods in the centrosymmet-
ric space group Pbca revealed the non-hydrogen structure. No
crystallographically imposed symmetry is present in either the
cation or the anion. Disorder is manifest in two orientations