6100
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6100-6101
Table 1. Dehydroamino Acids from Tertiary Alcohols
A Stereospecific Elimination to Form Dehydroamino
Acids: Synthesis of the Phomopsin Tripeptide Side
Chain
Michelle M. Stohlmeyer, Hiroko Tanaka, and
Thomas J. Wandless*
Department of Chemistry, Stanford UniVersity
Stanford, California 94305-5080
ReceiVed April 1, 1999
An increasing interest in R,â-dehydroamino acids has devel-
oped in recent years based both on their importance as commodity
chemicals and their presence in biologically active natural
products. Efficient methods for the asymmetric hydrogenation of
R,â-dehydroamino acids allow access to a wide variety of un-
natural amino acids.1 Dehydroamino acids are also found in many
natural products including the antrimycins, tentoxin, and the
phosphatase inhibitors microcystin and nodularin.2 Unsaturated
amino acids introduce elements of conformational rigidity as well
as changes in reactivity due to the presence of an alkene.3 In this
report, we describe an efficient and stereoselective method for
the synthesis of R,â-dehydroamino acids from readily available
â-hydroxyamino acids.
These findings grew out of research directed toward the total
synthesis of phomopsin A, which is a fungal metabolite that binds
to microtubules (Chart 1).4 Our synthetic approach required a
a The (2S,3S) substrate was used providing (E) 3.
ineffective. Others have used these methods to synthesize
dehydroisoleucine, and the most efficient method provided a 3:2
mixture of E and Z isomers.6
Chart 1
Enantiomerically pure â-hydroxy-R-amino acids are readily
accessible using Sharpless’ methods,7 and thus we chose dehydra-
tion as our preferred synthetic strategy. We observed that
treatment of an N-acyl-â-hydroxyamino ester with thionyl chloride
led to formation of cyclic sulfamidites. The diastereomeric
products, arising from two configurations at sulfur, were separated
and isolated. Treatment of either diastereomer with base resulted
in elimination of SO2 to yield the R,â-dehydroamino ester
(Scheme 1). The more oxidized cyclic sulfamidates have previ-
method to stereoselectively prepare (E)-dehydroisoleucine. A
variety of methods exist for the synthesis of dehydroamino acids,
and they have been reviewed recently.3c,5 Some of these ap-
proaches introduce unsaturation using elimination reactions such
as the dehydration of â-hydroxyamino acids as well as N-
chlorination followed by dehydrochlorination. Alternative methods
utilize condensation reactions (e.g., the Horner-Wadsworth-
Emmons reaction of phosphorylglycine esters) to form the double
bond. These methods generally rely on thermodynamic control
to dictate the alkene geometry. If there is no strong thermody-
namic preference or if the desired product is not the thermody-
namically favored isomer, the existing synthetic methods are often
Scheme 1
ously been used as substrates for nucleophilic substitution
reactions.8 Recently, direct nucleophilic ring openings of cyclic
sulfamidites derived from amino alcohols have been reported.9
However, neither cyclic sulfamidites nor sulfamidates have been
directly employed as substrates for elimination reactions.
Tertiary alcohols can be difficult to functionalize and stereo-
selectively eliminate due to steric crowding and a propensity to
undergo E1 elimination reactions. In our hands, tosylation and
mesylation of â-hydroxyisoleucine could only be achieved in low
yields, and subsequent elimination reactions led to complex
mixtures of products. However, Table 1 shows the results for the
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone: (650) 723-
(1) (a) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-
Interscience: New York, 1994; pp 16-28. (b) RajanBabu, T. V.; Ayers, T.
A.; Halliday, G. A.; You, K. K.; Calabrese, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
6012-6028. (c) Nagel, U.; Albrecht, J. Top. Catal. 1998, 5, 3-23.
(2) (a) Templeton, G. E. Microb. Toxins 1972, 8, 160-192. (b) Rich, D.
H.; Bhatnagar, P.; Mathiaparanam, P.; Grant, J. A.; Tam, J. P. J. Org. Chem.
1978, 43, 296-302. (c) Botes, D. P.; Tuinman, A. A.; Wessels, P. L.; Viljoen,
C. C.; Kruger, H.; Williams, D. H.; Santikarn, S.; Smith, R. J.; Hammond, S.
J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2311-2318. (d) Valentekovich, R. J.;
Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9069-9070.
(6) (a) Shin, C.; Yonezawa, Y.; Ikeda, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59,
3573-3579. (b) Schmidt, U.; Griesser, H.; Leitenberger, V.; Lieberknecht,
A.; Mangold, R.; Meyer R.; Riedl, B. Synthesis 1992, 487-490.
(7) (a) Gao, Y.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7538-
7539. (b) Kim, B. M.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 655-
658. (c) Shao, H.; Goodman, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2582-2583.
(8) (a) Baldwin, J. E.; Spivey, A. C.; Schofield, C. J. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1990, 1, 881-884. (b) Alker, D.; Doyle, K. J.; Harwood: L. M.;
McGregor, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1990, 1, 877-880.
(3) (a) Hagihara, M.; Anthony, N. J.; Stout, T. J.; Clardy, J.; Schreiber, S.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6568-6570. (b) Jain, R.; Chauhan, V. S.
Biopolymers 1996, 40, 105-119. (c) Humphrey, J. M.; Chamberlin, A. R.
Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 2243-2266.
(4) Mackay, M. F.; Van Donkelaar, A.; Culvenor, C. C. J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1986, 1219-1221.
(9) Gautun, H. S. H.; Carlsen, P. H. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6,
1667-1674.
(5) Schmidt, U.; Lieberknecht, A.; Wild, J. Synthesis 1988, 159-172.
10.1021/ja991037q CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/10/1999