larly elusive. Usually such compounds are prepared via a
Fischer indole synthesis with a cyclohexanone-derived hy-
drazone (and subsequent dehydrogenation),5 alkylation6
or Claisen rearrangement1 beginning with a 6-hydroxycar-
bazole, or annulation of an existing indole moiety.7 Draw-
backs to these methods include the lack of regiocontrol in
functionalizing an existing carbazole or the necessity to
prepare precursors with preexisting and extensive substitu-
tion.
in a number of ways to access the target molecules. Acid-
catalyzed ring closure of 10, for instance, yields eustifoline
D, whereas olefination of the aldehyde gives glycomaurrol.
Oxidative cyclization of glycomaurrol provides access to
eustifoline A (glycomaurin). Isopropenyl Grignard addition
to 10 and ketene acetal formation yield 11, which is a suitable
substrate for a Claisen rearrangement en route to eustifoline
C. Again, oxidative cyclization of eustifoline C can be
utilized to access eustifoline B.
We have recently reported a general synthesis of indoles8
which uses as its key transformation a Diels-Alder reaction
of a quinoid monoimine and subsequent Plieninger indoliza-
tion9 of the adducts (Scheme 1), as well as applications to
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Key Intermediates 13 and 14
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Indoles and Carbazoles
Our synthetic efforts commenced (Scheme 3) with the
readily available quinone imine 8 and diene 9 which
underwent a facile Diels-Alder cycloaddition in refluxing
CH2Cl2. Treatment of the resulting adducts with catalytic
DBU then afforded the desired aromatized species 12 as a
1:1 mixture of diastereomers in 91% overall yield.
The lack of diastereoselectivity in the formation of 12 was
of no concern because both stereocenters would later become
sp2 hybridized. The phenolic moiety was protected via
treatment with NaH and TIPSCl. Conversion of the dihy-
dronaphthalene to the tetrahydrocarbazole 13 was ac-
complished via oxidative cleavage of the double bond (via
the diol) followed by treatment of the resulting dicarbonyl
with acid to afford the desired tetrahydrocarbazole in 61%
yield over the four steps. Aldehyde reduction, tosyl removal,
and dehydrogenation yielded carbazole 14 in 89% yield over
the three steps. Tosyl removal was required to effect the
dehydrogenation. Reduction of the aldehyde was found
necessary to effect clean tosyl removal and dehydrogen-
ation.
target oriented synthesis.10 During our work, it occurred to
us that the use of a diene bearing a cyclohexyl ring fused at
the 1,2-positions would allow extension of this methodol-
ogy to the formation of carbazoles in a regiospecific
manner. In this communication, we illustrate the implemen-
tation of this strategy in the first total synthesis of eustifolines
A-C and alternative syntheses of glycomaurrol and eusti-
foline D.
Our divergent synthetic strategy has as its cornerstone the
synthesis of carbazole 10 or a closely related compound
(Scheme 2). The aldehyde group in 10 would be elaborated
Scheme 2. Synthetic Strategy
(5) Mulwad, V. V.; Dalvi, M. B.; Mahaddalkar, B. S. Indian J. Chem.,
Sect. B.: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem. 2002, 41, 1477.
(6) Hall, T. J.; Jackson, A. H.; Oliviera-Campos, A. M. F.; Queiroz, M.
J. R. P.; Shannon, P. V. R. Heterocycles 1990, 31, 401.
(7) Duval, E.; Cuny, G. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 5411.
(8) (a) Banfield, S. C.; England, D. B.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
3325. (b) Zawada, P. V.; Banfield, S. C.; Kerr, M. A. Synlett 2003, 971.
(c) England, D. B.; Kerr, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6519.
(9) (a) Plieninger, H.; Suhr, K. Chem. Ber. 1956, 89, 270. (b) Plieninger,
H.; Volkl, A. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 2121.
(10) (a) Jackson, S. K.; Banfield, S. C.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
1215. (b) England, D. B.; Magolan, J.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
2209. (c) Leduc, A. B.; Kerr, M. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 237. (d)
Ganton, M. D.; Kerr, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 574. (e) Jackson, S.
K.; Kerr, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1405-1411.
1884
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 10, 2007