Table 2 1H NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 3, 4 and 5
Compound
δ([2H6]Me2SO; 300 MHz)
3a
3b
4a
4b
5a
8.1 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.05 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.8 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.0 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.2–7.4 (m, 5H, Ph)
8.1 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.0 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.8 (d, J = 10 Hz, CH), 3.7 (s, 3H, CH3)
7.28 (s, 1H, CH), 6.56 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.14 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.4–7.51 (m, 5H, Ph)
7.58 (s, 1H, CH), 6.60 (s, 2H, NH2), 3.93 (s, 3H, CH3)
A: 7.7 (s, 1H, CH), 7.5 (s, 1H, NH), 6.6 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.1 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.3–7.5 (m, 5H, Ar)
B: 8.1 (s, 1H, NH), 7.6 (s, 1H, CH), 6.9 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.2 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.3–7.5 (m, 5H, Ar)
A:B, 3:1 ratio
5b
A: 7.9 (s, 1H, CH), 7.6 (s, 1H, NH), 6.6, (s, 2H, NH2), 3.9 (s, 3H, CH3)
B: 8.0 (s, 1H, NH), 7.8 (s, 1H, CH), 6.9 (s, 2H, NH2), 3.9 (s, 3H, CH3)
A:B, 5:1 ratio
8
9
8.3 (s, 1H, CH), 7.95 (s, 1H, CH), 7.36–7.45 (m, 5H, Ph), 5.22 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.28 (q, 2H, J = 7 Hz, CH2), 1.28 (t, 3H, CH3)
8.25 (s, 1H, CH), 8.15 (s, 1H, CH), 7.25–7.38 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.2 (br s, 2H, NH2), 5.4 (s, 2H, CH2)
Table 3 13C NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 3, 4 and 5
δC([2H6]Me2SO; 75 MHz)
Compound
C(2)
C(4)
C(5)
C(6)
CN
R
3a
3b
140.2
140.1
94.7
95.7
120.1
120.7
—
—
116.5
114.8
115.8
117.4
117.2
117.0
117.1
118.2
119.6
—
74.4 (CH2), 138.3, 128.5, 127.7, 127.5
62.0 (CH3)
4a
4b
5aa
5bb
8
128.5
127.2
136.5
136.8
146.3
158.3
86.4
86.1
97.5
98.6
135.9
150.4
144.3
143.7
142.7
144.1
136.4
120.1
—
—
144.7
144.4
—
80.8 (CH2), 133.6, 130.6, 129.9, 129.0
67.1 (CH3)
78.4 (CH2), 130.2, 129.4, 128.7, 133.4
66.1 (CH3)
18.2 (CH3), 67.9 (CH2), 85.7, (OCH2), 133.9, 134.0, 134.2, 165.5 (C᎐N)
85.8 (CH2), 133.7, 134.5, 134.8, 141.9, 150.0
᎐
9
161.3
a Only one set of bands is visible in the spectrum. b The data recorded belongs to the most abundant species, A. For B, the only signal which is visible
in the spectrum corresponds to C(2) at δ 138.4 ppm.
medium–strong band at 2210 cmϪ1 for the C᎐N stretching
identified as the imidazole14 led to a complex mixture. 1H NMR
spectroscopic examination of the oil showed the presence of the
bands assigned by Watson to the imidazole 4a, clearly indicat-
ing that this is a different compound.
᎐
᎐
vibration. The corresponding carbon atom can be identified in
the 13C NMR at 117.1 (5a) and 118.2 (5b) ppm. Only one set of
bands is visible in the 13C NMR spectrum of each compound,
1
1
which is in contrast with the data registered in the H NMR,
The H NMR data reported by Watson indicate a C(2)–H
where two sets of bands are always present in a 3:1 ratio (5a)
and 5:1 ratio (5b).
The structure of the 5-amino-4-cyano imidazoles 4 was
proton at δ 6.84 and NH2 protons at δ 5.00 ppm (cf. δ 7.28
and 6.56 ppm respectively for compound 4a). In earlier work1
we have described a large number of substituted 5-amino-4-
cyanoimidazole derivatives and in all cases the C(2)–H proton
of the imidazole ring appears within a relatively narrow range
of δ 7.15 to 7.65 ppm. A chemical shift of δ 6.84 ppm is
unprecedented. In contrast, the CHN2 proton of the amidines
3a and 3b, which appear in the NMR spectrum at δ 6.80 ppm
(see Table 2) agree well with the figure quoted by Watson.14 For
this reason, we feel that the most plausible structure for the
compound isolated by Watson is the amidine 4c, i.e. an isomer
assigned on the basis of elemental analysis and spectroscopic
᎐
data. The C᎐N stretching vibration is a typical feature in the IR
᎐
spectrum of these compounds and corresponds to an intense
band at 2215 cmϪ1 (4a) and 2211 cmϪ1 (4b). A strong band at
around 1650 cmϪ1 is visible in both spectra and may be assigned
to the C᎐N stretching vibration. In the 1H NMR spectrum, the
᎐
NH2 group always shows up as a singlet in the δ 6.5–6.6 ppm
region and this seems to be a typical feature of the 5-amino-4-
cyanoimidazoles that have been prepared (see Table 2).1,2,4,10
The C–H proton gives a sharp singlet at δ 7.28 (4a) and δ 7.58
(4b) ppm. All the bands in the 13C NMR are sharp, with the
signals for C(4) and C(5) around δ 86 and 144 ppm respectively
(see Table 3).
The synthesis of imidazole 4a has been previously reported
by Watson14 from the reaction of aminomalononitrile toluene-
p-sulfonate and triethyl orthoformate to form the imino ether
tosylate, which on reflux with an equivalent of benzyloxyamine
in ether gave the product as white crystals in only 19% yield.
Considering that both the melting point and spectroscopic data
for this compound were different from the values now reported,
the experimental procedure described in the literature was care-
fully reproduced. In the complex reaction mixture it was pos-
sible to identify the presence of imidazole 4a (by TLC) and this
compound was selectively isolated in less than 1% yield. The 1H
NMR and IR data on this compound, compare exactly with the
values that were obtained in this present work for the solid
isolated in the cyclization of amidine 3a by alcoholic sodium
hydroxide solution. Attempts to isolate the product previously
OCH2Ph
N
OCH2Ph
N
NH2
N
H
H
H
CN
CN
N
H
N
CN
H
4c
11
and precursor to the imidazole 4a. The signal attributed by him
to an NH2 group could arise by the accidental equivalence of
the CH(CN)2 proton and the NH proton. Such an amidine
might be expected to tautomerise in solution and coupling
between the CH and NH protons might not be observed.
The different behaviour of the amidines 3a and b in the pres-
ence of KOH and DBU requires explanation. In the presence of
a relatively strong base KOH in ethanol or water there is good
evidence to indicate that the amidines 3 are deprotonated to
form an anion. So, for example, when NaOH (2 × 10Ϫ2 mol
dmϪ3) in ethanol was added to a solution of amidine 3a
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 1853–1858
1855