387
S. Desrat et al.
Letter
Synlett
Finally, the impact of the nature of the ester was studied
(Table 3). For this purpose, benzylamine (4a) was stirred
with different esters and MAO for 15 minutes with micro-
wave heating. The reaction was found to be sensitive to the
steric bulk of the aliphatic leaving groups. Indeed, a de-
crease in the conversion rate of the ester into the amide was
observed between the methyl, isopropyl, and tert-butyl
group (Table 3, entries 1–3). The phenyl and benzyl esters
19 and 20 led to the corresponding amide with very good
yields (Table 3, entries 4 and 5). Moreover, despite the lower
conversion rate, the aliphatic amide resulting from methyl
butyrate 21 could be obtained in a moderate yield (Table 3,
entry 6). This can probably be explained by ester volatility.
Carboxylic acids were also tested under the same condi-
tions but did not give the expected amides.
In conclusion, a new and efficient method for the direct
amidation of esters is disclosed using MAO as a safe alterna-
tive to trimethylaluminium. This easy-to-handle reaction
can be performed either at room temperature or within a
few minutes on exposure to microwave irradiation. More-
over, the conditions are well tolerated by a great range of
amines and esters, despite the unfavorable influence of ste-
ric bulk of the reactants; although, this feature could be ap-
plied to develop selective amidation reactions in the
presence of different esters.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful for the funding provided by the ANR
(ANR2010-JCJC-702-1) as well as for a grant from the University of
Malaya and the French embassy in Malaysia (S.G).
Table 3 Influence of the Nature of Ester in Direct Amidation
References and Notes
O
ester (1 equiv), MAO (3 equiv)
NH2
(1) (a) Valeur, E.; Bradley, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 606.
(b) Pattabiraman, V. R.; Bode, J. W. Nature (London, U.K.) 2011,
480, 471.
R
N
MW, 110 °C, 15 min
H
4a
(2) (a) Gooβen, L. J.; Ohlmann, D. M.; Lange, P. P. Synthesis 2009,
160. (b) Veitch, G. E.; Bridgwood, K. L.; Ley, S. V. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 3623. (c) Kim, B. R.; Lee, H.-G.; Kang, S.-B.; Sung, G. H.; Kim,
J.-J.; Park, J. K.; Lee, S.-G.; Yoon, Y.-J. Synthesis 2012, 44, 42.
(d) Huang, Z.; Reilly, J. E.; Buckle, R. N. Synlett 2007, 1026. (e) Al-
Zoubi, R. M.; Marion, O.; Hall, D. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008,
2876. (f) Gernigon, N.; Al-Zoubi, R. M.; Hall, D. G. J. Org. Chem.
2012, 77, 8386. (g) Bao, Y.-S.; Zhaorigetu, B.; Angula, B.; Baiyin,
M.; Jia, M. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 803. (h) Han, C.; Lee, J. P.;
Lobkovsky, E.; Porco, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10039.
(i) Hosseini-Sarvari, M.; Sodagar, E.; Doroodmand, M. M. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 76, 2853.
(3) (a) Basha, A.; Lipton, M.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977,
48, 4171. (b) Gustafsson, T.; Ponten, F.; Seeberger, P. H. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 1100. (c) Chung, S. W.; Uccello, D. P.; Choi, H.;
Montgomery, J. I.; Chen, J. Synlett 2011, 2072.
(4) (a) Chen, E. Y.-X.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1391.
(b) Negureanu, L.; Hall, R. W.; Butler, L. G.; Simerall, L. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16816.
Entry
1
Ester
Conv. (%)a
Yield (%)b
O
O
O
O
O
O
>95
90
90
OMe
Oi-Pr
Ot-Bu
OPh
16
17
18
19
2
3
4
5
6
75
50
38
87
88
54
>95
>95
80
(5) Lipshutz, B. H.; Butler, T.; Lower, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
15396.
(6) General Procedures
Method A: To a mixture of ester (1 mmol) and amine (2 mmol)
under an argon atmosphere was added a 10% solution of MAO
in toluene (2 mL, 3 mmol). After 5 h at r.t., the solution was
diluted with MTBE (3 mL) and quenched by addition of 10% aq
NaOH (2 mL). The product was then extracted with MTBE (3×)
and the combined organic layers were washed with a 1 M solu-
tion of HCl, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under
reduced pressure to give usually the pure product (purity >90%).
Less pure products were purified by flash chromatography on
silica gel using a mixture of heptane and EtOAc.
OBn
20
21
OMe
Method B: A mixture of ester (1 mmol) and amine (2 mmol)
was placed in a MW vial under an argon atmosphere. A 10%
solution of MAO in toluene (2 mL, 3 mmol) was then added, and
the mixture was irradiated and stirred for 15 min at 110 °C. The
solution was then cooled to r.t. and diluted with MTBE. The
products were isolated in the same manner as in method A.
a Conversion of ester into amide calculated from 1H NMR spectrum of the
crude mixture.
b Yield of isolated product obtained after flash column chromatography on
silica gel.
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synlett 2015, 26, 385–387