Scheme 3
surprise, Baylis–Hillman adduct (+)-3a, on heating in toluene or
p-xylene in a sealed tube at 210 °C, formed the bicyclic products
1a, b, which were isolated in modest yields (37–45%).‡ Use of
chlorobenzene or anisole as solvents gave unaltered starting
material (+)-3a. When enyne (+)-3b was used instead of diene
(+)-3a the reaction proceeded in the same manner, giving
product (+)-1c in good yield (60%). Furthermore, thermal
treatment of enyne (+)-3c with p-xylene gave the bicycle (+)-1e
in reasonable yield (Scheme 2). Interestingly, the use of benzyl
alcohol allowed us to obtain the hemiacetal derivative of
compound 1d. Although this latter compound was isolated in
low yield (20%) this is an interesting case because three new
chiral centers are generated in a highly stereoselective manner.§
All compounds 1 were obtained as single diastereomers. When
a catalytic amount of hydroquinone was added, the reaction rate
was considerably reduced and the product yield fell dramat-
ically. This fact confirms that a radical reaction is involved.
Also, together with compounds 1, 1,2-diarylethanes were
isolated as byproducts in all cases. These products may be
formed by recombination of the initially generated benzylic
radicals.
In view of the particular disposition of the 1,5- and 1,6-enyne
azetidin-2-ones to undergo 5-exo and 6-exo tin promoted radical
cyclization,12 we examined the applicability of this method-
ology to our novel Baylis–Hillman 1,w-enyne substrates 3b–3d
for the synthesis of less common bicyclic b-lactams. This
approach in the synthesis of seven-membered or higher sized
rings has not been hitherto applied.13 A dramatic change in the
chemoselectivity was observed when the bicyclic b-lactam
(+)-2a was formed as the exclusive product from (+)-3b, in
nearly quantitative yield as crude product. The tin-promoted
radical reaction was also useful in the conversion of the
homologous 1,4-tethered enynes (+)-3c and (+)-3d into the
corresponding bicyclic systems with similar efficiency and
selectivity. Compounds 2 were exclusively obtained as Z-
isomers. In addition, PhSH reacted smoothly with b-lactams
(+)-3b and (+)-3c in the presence of AIBN, in boiling benzene,
to give in good yields the corresponding phenylthiovinyl
derivatives as mixtures of easily separable Z and E isomers
(Scheme 3). The bicyclic structure (by DEPT, HETCOR, and
COSY) and the stereochemistry (by vicinal proton couplings
and NOE experiments) of compounds 1 and 2 were established
by NMR one- and two-dimensional techniques.
Scheme 4
Notes and references
† When the reaction was performed at room temperature maintaining the
molar ratio of reagents (aldehyde:DABCO:methyl vinyl ketone = 1+1+10),
partial epimerisation together with some unreacted aldehyde were ob-
served.
‡ Representative experimental procedure for thermal promoted tandem
radical reaction: A solution of Baylis–Hillman adduct 3 (0.2 mmol) in the
corresponding benzylic solvent (10 ml) was heated in a sealed tube at
210 °C for 3 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room
temperature, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and, after
purification by flash chromatography, bicycles 1 were obtained in
analytically pure form.
§ All new compounds were fully characterised by spectroscopic methods
and microanalysis and/or HRMS.
1 Reviews: E. Ciganek, Org. React., 1997, 51, 201; D. Basavaiah, P. D.
Rao and R. S. Hyma, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 8001.
2 For leading references, see: D. P. Curran, N. A. Porter and B. Giese, in
Stereochemistry of Radical Reactions, VCH Publishers, New York,
1996; D. P. Curran, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M.
Trost, Pergamon, Oxford, 1992, vol 4, ch. 4.2.
3 See, for example: D. Niccolai, L. Tarsi and R. J. Thomas, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 2333; V. Hook, Chem. Br., 1997, 33, 34; J. Davies,
Science, 1994, 264, 375.
4 See for example: Symposia-in-Print Number 8, Recent Advances in the
Chemistry and Biology of b-Lactams and b-Lactam antibiotics, ed. G. I.
Georg, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1993, 3, 2159.
5 B. Alcaide and P. Almendros, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 1015.
6 J. Knight, P. J. Parsons and R. Southgate, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1986, 78; J. Knight and P. J. Parsons, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1987, 1237.
7 M. D. Bachi, F. Frolow and C. Hoornaert, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48,
1841.
8 D. L. Boger and R. Mathvink, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 3377.
9 G. I. Georg and V. T. Ravikumar, in The Organic Chemistry of b-
Lactams, ed. G. I. Georg, VCH, Weinheim, 1993, ch. 3, p. 295.
10 S. E. Drewes, A. A. Khan and K. Rowland, Synth. Commun., 1993, 23,
183.
11 W. B. Motherwell and D. Crich, in Free Radical Chain Reactions in
Organic Synthesis, Academic Press, London, 1991, ch. 6, pp. 183–185
and references cited therein.
Formation of bicyclic b-lactams 1 and 2 can be explained in
terms of a competition between a tandem radical Michael
addition–endo-cyclization and a tandem radical addition–
Michael addition, depending on the electronic nature of the
radical promoter (Scheme 4). The more nucleophilic benzylic
radical would favour formation of compounds 1, while the more
electrophilic radicals, such as PhS. and Ph3Sn., should promote
formation of compounds 2. The high stereoselectivity of the
processes can be tentatively interpreted in terms of the allylic
strain model of Giese, showing for planar substituents such as
Ac good levels of 1,2-stereoinduction on a-substituted b-oxy
radicals (types 5 and 6 in Scheme 4).14
12 B. Alcaide, I. M. Rodr´ıguez-Campos, J. Rodr´ıguez-Lopez and A.
Rodr´ıguez-Vincente, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 5377.
13 The only related example is by Parsons et al. and refers to the cyclization
of N-(2-bromoprop-2-en-1-yl)-4-allylazetidin-2-one to yield a homo-
carbacephem derivative. See ref. 6.
We would like to thank the DGES (MEC-Spain, grant PB96-
0565) for financial support. P. A. thanks the DGES (MEC,
Spain) for a ‘Contrato de Incorporación’. C. A. thanks the DGI
(CEC-Comunidad de Madrid-Spain) for a fellowship.
14 B. Giese, M. Bulliard, J. Dickhaut, R. Halbach, C. Hassler, U.
Hoffmann, B. Hinzen and M. Senn, Synlett, 1995, 116.
Communication 9/05017E
1914
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1913–1914