dihydropyridyl acetic acid (1) in very low yields has been
reported as an artifact during acetylation reactions using
acetic anhydride and pyridine.7a,b We now report the
activation of acetic anhydride by means of metal salts to
give a simple and practical access to N-acetyl-1,2-dihydro-
pyridylaceticacid. Furthermore, wereportsimpleelabora-
tions of this nucleus to give piperidines with unconven-
tional substitution patterns.
Table 1. Screening of Metal Salts As Promoter of the Perkinꢀ
Acyl-Mannich Additiona
We recently noticed that attempted acetylation of cyclo-
hexenyl hydroxylamino alcohol 38 in pyridine afforded N-
acetyl-1,2-dihydropyridine acetic acid 1a as the major
reaction product (Scheme 1). Close examination of the
reaction showed that the presence of tiny amounts of
copper salts present as impurities in starting compound 3
was responsible for the addition of acetic anhydride to
pyridine.
regioisomeric
entry
Lewis acid
TONb
ratio (1a/2a)c
1
Cu(OTf)2
CuCl2
7
85/15
n.d.
2
ꢀ
ꢀ
5
3
CuCl
n.d.
4
FeCl3
70/30
75/25
68/32
80/20
85/15
5
Sc(OTf)3
MgBr2
2
Scheme 1. Unexpected Product from Acetylation Reaction of
Compound 3
6
5
7
8d
Zn(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
6
15
a Reaction carried out at rt using 1.0 mmol of metal salt, pyridine (8.1
mL), and Ac2O (9.45 mL). After 24 h the reaction was filtered on a pad of
Celite and evaporated to dryness. b Moles of crude products by weight
per mole of catalyst. c Determined by 1H NMR of the crude mixture.
d Reaction time was 7 d.
coordinates to the carbonyl oxygen of the acetic anhydride
to give a copper enolate species A after deprotonation of
the R-proton by the acetate anion (Scheme 2). The sub-
sequent addition of the in situ generated copper enolate to
N-acetyl pyridinium ion occurs mainly at the C-2 position,
and only this pathway is shown. Additionꢀelimination of
the acetate anion to the in situ formed mixed anhydride B
established an equilibrium in which compound 1a, its
carboxylate anion, and compound B are present. Initial
attempts to work up the reaction by partitioning the crude
mixture with water and AcOEt proved to be difficult and
led to the loss of a large quantity of the products obtained.
On the other hand, a simple filtration on Celite did not lead
to a satisfactory crude reaction product, as it did not
completely remove the metal salt.
Hence, a weighted amount of anhydrous Cu(OTf)2 was
poured into a 1:1 mixture of pyridine and Ac2O and left to
stir overnight. A simple filtration on Celite afforded a
crude mixture containing 1,2-dihydropyridine 1a (85%)
and 1,4-dihydropyridine 2 (15%) (entry 1, Table 1). It
should be noted that despite the presence of soft enoliza-
tion methods for ketones and other carboxylic acid deri-
vatives basedon the use ofLewis acidꢀLewis base systems,
nothing similar has been described for a carboxylic acid
anhydride.9 Lewis acids as promotersfor this reaction were
also briefly surveyed, evaluating the moles of crude pro-
ducts per mole of catalyst (TON), and the regioisomeric
ratios of addition products 1a and 2a.
As shown in Table 1, other Lewis acids gave the corre-
sponding addition products, albeit with a lower TON and
regioisomeric ratio (entries 4ꢀ6). In particular, a good
result was obtained with Zn(OTf)2 (entry 7), while no
reaction was observed with highly coordinated copper
salts such as CuCl and CuCl2 (entries 2 and 3). When the
mixture was allowed to react for seven days in the presence
of Cu(OTf)2, a significant increase in the TON was ob-
tained (entry 8). The lack of reactivity observed in control
experiments in which the metal salt was omitted points to a
“soft enolization” pathway, in which the Cu2þ salt
Moreover, compounds 1a and 2a were not completely
stable during chromatographic purification on silica gel,
making separation of the two regioisomers in a pure state
difficult. Satisfactory removal of the copper salt was
obtained with an aqueous workup in the presence of a
saturated aqueous solution of Na2EDTA. Subsequent
(10) For leading examples, see: (a) Pipecolic acid: Lemire, A.; Charette,
A. B. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2077–2080. (b) (ꢀ)-Oseltamivir: Satoh, N.;
Akiba, T.; Yokoshima, S.; Fukuyama, T. Tetrahedron 2010, 65, 3229–
3245. (c) Iboga alkaloids: Weinstein, B.; Chang Lin, L.-C.; Fowler, F. W.
J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1657–1661. (d) Sundberg, R. J.; Cherney, R. J.
J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6028–6037. (e) Reserpine: Wender, P. A.;
Schaus, J. M.; White, A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6157–6159.
(f) Homoepibatidines: Krow, G. R.; Cheung, O. H.; Hu, Z.; Huang, Q.;
Hutchinson, J.; Liu, N.; Nguyen, K. T.; Ulrich, S.; Yuan, J.; Xiao, Y.;
Wypij, D. M.; Zuo, F.; Carroll, P. J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 7747–7756.
Lycopodium alkaloids: Comins, D. L.; Brooks, C. A.; Al-awar, R. S.;
Goehring, R. R. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 229–231.
(8) Crotti, S.; Bertolini, F.; Macchia, F.; Pineschi, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2010, 51, 2284–2286.
(9) For recent examples, see: (a) Kohler, M. C.; Yost, J. M.; Garnsey,
M. R.; Coltart, D. M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3376–3379. (b) Lim, D.; Zhou,
G.; Coltart, D. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4139–4142. For a seminal paper,
see:(c) Tirpak, R. E.; Olsen, R. S.; Rathke, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
4877–4879.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 19, 2011
5153