Electronic Interactions in Verdazyl Biradicals
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 26, 1999 9391
dication. Room-temperature EPR spectra of 7 are nearly
identical to those for 1, but |D/hc| and |E/hc| parameters
derived from spectra of frozen solution suggest a higher
degree of electronic delocalization in 7 than in 1. Al-
though biradical 7 is highly air sensitive, it displays a
smaller singlet-triplet energy gap than the oxygen
analogue 1.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Meth od s. Phosgene (20% from Fluka) and meth-
ylhydrazine were used without further purification, producing
2,4-dimethylhydrazide.35 This in turn was condensed with the
dialdehyde of the spacer of interest to produce the correspond-
ing tetrahydrazine. The tetrahydrazine was then oxidized with
either potassium ferricyanide, tetraphenylhydrazine, or lead
oxide to produce the desired bisverdazyl biradical.14
F igu r e 10. Dependence of the product of susceptibility and
temperature (øNT) on temperature (T) for 7. The solid line is a
ø
T)
best fit to the function NT ) P + ke(-∆E/k with ∆E ) 0.069
B
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on an NMR
spectrometer at 300 and 75.5 MHz, respectively. X-band EPR
spectra were recorded on a spectrometer fitted with a liquid
helium cryostat. Powder EPR spectra were simulated using
WINEPR SimFonia, Shareware version 1.25. Absorption spec-
tra were recorded on a scanning spectrophotometer equipped
with a near-infrared (IR) detector. Electrochemical measure-
ments were carried out on a potentiostat using a Pt wire
working electrode, a Pt coil auxiliary electrode, and a Ag/AgCl
reference electrode. For each electrochemical experiment, the
supporting electrolyte was 0.1 M NBu4PF6 in acetonitrile. The
electrolyte had been recrystallized three times from absolute
ethanol and dried under vacuum, and the solvent was purified
according to previously described methods.36 All other reagents
were purchased from Aldrich and were used as received.
Melting points were recorded on a capillary apparatus and are
uncorrected.
eV, k ) 12200, p ) 7.6.
consistent with the cyclic voltammetry peak splitting.
Thus, 7 has a peak splitting of about one-half of that of
1.
Inspection of the half-field region of the spectrum of 7
reveals signals consistent with transitions between the
ms ) -1 and ms ) +1 states of the triplet. The temper-
ature dependence of this signal allows for the singlet-
triplet energy separation J to be determined. The tem-
ø
perature dependence of øNT (where ) I/I300, where I is
N
the integrated signal intensity and I300 is the integrated
signal intensity at 300 K), was determined from the EPR
signal intensity for 7 (Figure 10). Fitting these data to
eq 110
Syn th esis of 1,3-Bis(1,5-d im eth yl-6-oxo-3-ver d a zyl)-
ben zen e (4). To a solution of 0.42 g (3.1 mmol) of isophthal-
dehyde in 5 mL of 100% ethanol, at 80 °C, was added 0.96 g
(8.1 mmol) of 2,4-dimethylcarbonohydrazide. After heating for
5 min, a white precipitate had formed. The mixture was stored
at 10 °C for 4 h and the white solid collected by filtration (63%).
ø
BT)
NT ) P + ke(-∆E/k
(1)
gives a singlet-triplet energy gap of 560 cm-1 (0.069 eV).
This value is lower than that found for 1, where the
activation energy has been determined to be 887 cm-1
(0.11 eV).10
1
Mp: 181 °C (dec). H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.72 (1 H, s), 7.48-
7.36 (3 H, m), 5.68 (4 H, d), 4.90 (2 H, t), 2.94 (12 H, s). 13C
NMR (DMSO-d6): 154.5, 136.8, 128.1, 126.5, 126.1, 68.6, and
37.6 ppm. HRMS (CI): (m/z) C14H20N8O2 (M + H)+ calcd
335.1944, found 335.1938.
Con clu sion s
Into a small vial, 102.5 mg (0.306 mmol) of 1,3-bis(1,5-
dimethylhexahydro-6-oxo-1,2,4,5-tetrazin-3-yl)benzene and 732.6
mg (3.27 mmol) of lead oxide in 10 mL of dry THF were stirred
for 24 h under inert conditions. The lead oxide was removed
by filtering an EPR sample through a 0.2 µm Teflon syringe
filter, yielding a red solution. HRMS (CI): (m/z) C14H16N8O2
(M + H)+ calcd 329.147, found 329.147.
Syn th esis of 1,4-Bis(1,5-d im eth yl-6-oxo-3-ver d a zyl)-
ben zen e (5). In a round-bottom flask was placed 100 mg (0.31
mmol) of 1,4-bis(1,5-dimethylhexahydro-6-oxo-1,2,4,5-tetrazin-
3-yl)benzene29 in 6 mL of water. Na2CO3 (3 mL, 2 N) was added
together with 600 mg (1.8 mmol) of K3Fe(CN)6 in 5 mL of
water. The solution was stirred for 4 h and was then extracted
with CH2Cl2. The solvent was removed under vacuum. The
product (50 mg, 0.15 mmol, 48%) was collected as a red solid.
Mp: 250 °C (dec). UV-vis (CH3CN): λmax nm (log ꢀ): 415
(3.17), 277 (4.48), 200 (4.28). HRMS (CI): (m/z) C14H16N8O2
(M + H)+ calcd 329.3531, found 329.1487. LRMS (CI+): 329
(49%).
Electronic coupling between the radical centers in
substituted verdazyl biradicals is affected by substitution
at the C3 position. Aromatic spacers at C3 in 4-6 decrease
the magnitude of coupling between the two unpaired
electrons, compared to 1, as shown by cyclic voltammetry
and EPR spectral measurements. This effect is illustrated
in the observed electrochemistry, where two one-electron
oxidation waves (to produce a dication) are observed for
1, whereas a single two-electron oxidation wave is evident
in 5 and 6. Significant red shifts in the absorption
spectra, however, indicate structural perturbation by
these binding groups, although spectral broadening
makes unambiguous assignment of the causes for these
differences difficult.
Biradicals 4-6 all gave linear Curie plots with D
values ranging from 0.0043 to 0.0063 cm-1. A linear Curie
plot confirms that each member of this family exists as
a ground-state triplet or as a species with a degenerate
triplet/singlet energy level.21
Replacement of oxygen at C6 in 1 with sulfur in 7 does
affect the electronic structure of the biradical. The
absorption spectrum of 7 is red-shifted by about 50 nm
from that of 1. Electrochemical measurements indicate
two one-electron oxidation waves in 7, but scan reversal
reveals only one return wave, suggesting an unstable
Syn th esis of 2,5-Bis(1,5 d im eth yl-6-oxo-3-ver d a zyl)-
th iop h en e (6). To a solution of 1.1 g (8.9 mmol) of 2,4-
dimethylcarbonohydrazide in 10 mL of ethanol was added 0.50
g (3.6 mmol) of thiophenedicarboxaldehyde. The solution was
(35) Raphaelian, L.; Hooks, H.; Ottmann, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1967, 6, 363.
(36) Knorr, A. Funktionalisierte Fluoreszenzfarbstoffe auf Anthracen-
und Pyrenbasis; Knorr, A., Ed.; University of Regensburg: Regensburg,
1995.