the case of 12. For the latter, a symmetrical correlation between
py1 of the AuIII porphyrins and the pairs (5A,6A) of protons of 4
could be observed, which, in the case of 11, involved protons 4A
and 5A instead.
All of these data suggest that, in the threaded system 11, the
ZnII porphyrin components are roughly antiparallel, as shown in
Scheme 1, each being tilted towards the phenanthroline chelate
of the macrocycle maybe thanks to attractive interactions
between the electron-rich ZnII porphyrin of one macrocycle and
the electron-deficient CuI-complexed phenanthroline included
1
in the other macrocycle. The significant differences in the H
NMR spectra of 11 and 12 suggest that the AuIII porphyrin
dimer has a conformation dramatically different from that of the
ZnII porphyrin dimer. The AuIII porphyrins being cationic, they
are no longer able to stack with the CuI-complexed phenanthro-
lines, due to electrostatic repulsion. A likely conformation
would be that represented in Scheme 1, in which the two AuIII
porphyrins are roughly parallel. In conclusion, the threaded
complexes 11 and 12 represent new members of the family of
porphyrin dimers assembled with coordination bonds. The
present study also shows that, by modifying the nature of the
central metal in threaded porphyrin-containing systems, dra-
matic geometrical changes are induced.
We warmly thank J.-D. Sauer for the 400 MHz NMR spectra
and R. Huber for the FAB mass spectra. We are grateful to P.
Staub for the preparation of 3-bromophenanthroline. M. L.
thanks the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la
Recherche for a fellowship.
Notes and references
† All of the new compounds were characterized by 1H NMR and mass
spectrometry or elemental analysis, and the data are in agreement with the
structures.
1 J. Deisenhofer and H. Michel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28,
829; R. Huber, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28, 848; W.
Kühlbrandt, Nature, 1995, 374, 497; T. Pullerits and V. Sundström, Acc.
Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 381.
2 J. Deisenhofer, O. Epp, K. Miki, R. Huber and H. Michel, J. Mol. Biol.,
1984, 180, 385; J. P. Allen, G. Feher, T. O. Yeates, H. Komiya and D. C.
Rees, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1987, 84, 5730.
3 A. M. Brun, S. J. Atherton, A. Harriman, V. Heitz and J.-P. Sauvage,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 4632; A. Harriman, F. Odobel and J.-P.
Sauvage, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 9461; A. V. Chernook, A. M.
Shulga, E. I. Zenkevich, U. Rempel and C. von Borczyskowski, Ber.
Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 2065; C. A. Hunter and R. K. Hyde,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1936; R. V. Slone and J. T.
Hupp, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 5422.
4 M. R. Wasielewski, U. H. Smith, B. T. Cope and J. J. Katz, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1977, 99, 4172; Y. Kobuke and H. Miyaji, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1994, 116, 4111; R. T. Stibrany, J. Vasudevan, S. Knapp, J. A. Potenza,
T. Emge and H. J. Schugar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 3980.
5 W. W. Parson and A. Warshel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 6153; J. R.
Reimers and N. S. Hush, Chem. Phys., 1995, 197, 323.
6 D. B. Amabilino, C. O. Dietrich-Buchecker and J.-P. Sauvage, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 3285.
Scheme 1 CuI-directed threading of macrocycle 9 or 10 onto bis-
phenanthroline 4. Protons highlighted in the text are indicated, as well as
intercomponent NOE effects.
7 Y. Saitoh, T. Koizumi, K. Osakada and T. Yamamoto, Can. J. Chem.,
1997, 75, 1336.
8 M. Rehahn, A. D. Schlüter and G. Wegner, Makromol. Chem., 1990,
191, 1991.
9 P. Galda and M. Rehahn, Synthesis, 1996, 614.
10 J.-C. Chambron, C. Dietrich-Buchecker, J.-F. Nierengarten, J.-P.
Sauvage, N. Solladié, A.-M. Albrecht-Gary and M. Meyer, New J.
Chem., 1995, 19, 409.
11 M. Linke, J.-C. Chambron, V. Heitz, J.-P. Sauvage and V. Semetey,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 2469.
12. C. O. Dietrich-Buchecker and J.-P. Sauvage, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46,
503; D. B. Amabilino and J.-P. Sauvage, New J. Chem., 1998, 22,
395.
13 C. O. Dietrich-Buchecker, P. A. Marnot, J.-P. Sauvage, J.-P. Kintzinger
and P. Maltèse, Nouv. J. Chim., 1984, 8, 573.
corresponding phenylene groups is slow on the NMR timescale,
and a and b protons of 11 clearly form two sets of diastereotopic
pairs of atoms.
1
Despite these common features, the H NMR spectra of the
threaded complexes 11 and 12 showed dramatic differences,
which could not be attributed solely to the different nature of the
metal cation of the porphyrins. Upon threading, protons 2A of 4
and (4,7) of the macrocycles are 22.54 and 20.59 ppm more
shielded, respectively, when 11 is compared to 12. 2D 1H NMR
ROESY experiments on 11 showed a remarkable inter-
component NOE crosspeak between the ZnII porphyrin But
groups and the pair (5,6) of protons of the phenanthroline
fragment belonging to a different macrocycle, that was absent in
Communication 9/07284E
2420
Chem. Commun., 1999, 2419–2420